Abstract
From the perspective of institutions, sustainability is a set of values for how ecosystems are used. From this perspective, for institutions to foster sustainable development and research, the institutions must reflect the proper set of values. If the current values of institutions are not focused sufficiently on sustainability, it becomes necessary to know how institutions change their values.
One initiative which has been intended to change the values of institutions is role-exchanges between scientists and fishers. These initiatives have great value because they foster better communication and respect between groups with different traditions. However, it would be a retrograde step to use these role-exchanges as a vehicle to create wholly egalitarian roles for fishers and scientists. The improved communication and respect for different traditions of knowledge should be the basis for a new synthesis of science and the unrecorded knowledge fishers have of ecology. It has not been easy for institutions, and the people who constitute them, to gain respect and understanding for other ways to knowledge, nor has it been easy for them to change their values as individuals and institutions. However, in the past few decades we have seen both the civil rights movement and the women’s movement make great strides on this path. We should view these as precedents, study them, and learn from them how to change the values of our institutions to reflect values of sustainability, and foster excellence in all the people and groups — scientists, managers, users — associated with the institutions either as members or as clients.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anon. (1994) DFO National Program Review. 9 Committees; 14 volumes of reports. Internal report.
Anon. (1995) Roles and Responsibilities Document. DFO Pacific Region Stock Assessment Reorganisation Team. Internal Report, 26 pp.
BC Groundfish Research and Management Society (1995) Articles of incorporation as non-profit association for industry-government partnership.
Charles, A.T. (1995) Fisheries science: the study of fishery systems. Aquat. Living Resour. 8, 233–239.
DFO Science (1996) Overview of the status of Canadian Groundfish Stocks in the Atlantic Zone. SSR 96/40, 16 pp.
Finlayson, C. (1994) Fishing for Truth: A Sociological Analysis of Northern Cod Stock Assessment from 1977 to 1990, Memorial University of Newfoundland Institute of Social and Economic Research, Publ. no. 52, 176 pp.
Fisheries Resource Conservation Council (1994) Conservation: Stay the Course — Report to the Minister of Fisheries and Oceans on 1995 Conservation Requirements for Atlantic Groundfish. FRCC 94. Minister of Supply and Services, Ottawa, 138 pp.
King, P.A., Elsworth, S.G. and Baker, R.F. (1994) Partnerships — the route to better communication, in Coastal Zone Canada 94: Conference Proceedings (eds P.G. Wells and P.J. Ricketts), Coastal Zone, Canada Association, Dartmouth, NS, pp. 596–611.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rice, J. (1998). Fostering sustainable development and research by encouraging the right kind of institutions. In: Pitcher, T.J., Pauly, D., Hart, P.J.B. (eds) Reinventing Fisheries Management. Fish & Fisheries Series, vol 23. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4433-9_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4433-9_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-5777-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4433-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive