Abstract
The current tornado of political activity about affirmative action, voter initiatives labeled “pro civil rights,” and legal rulings on college admissions policies have thrown the higher education community into the center of a troubling national debate. Testing organizations join higher education at this vortex as standardized tests are simultaneously the presumed culprit and the presumed solution for many of these difficult issues.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Campbell, J.R., P.L., Reese, C.M., & Phillips, G.W. (1996)., NAEP 1994 Reading Report Card for the Nation and the States; Findings from the National Assessment of Educational Progress and Trial State Assessment. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education.
Willingham, W. W. & Cole, N. S. (in press). Gender and Fair Assessment. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Willingham, W. W., Lewis, C., Morgan, R., & Ramist, L. (1990). Predicting college grades: An analysis of institutional trends over two decades. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cole, N.S. (1999). Epilogue: Part 3 Merit and Opportunity: Testing and Higher Education at the Vortex. In: Nettles, A.L., Nettles, M.T. (eds) Measuring Up. Evaluation in Education and Human Services, vol 48. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4399-8_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4399-8_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5890-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4399-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive