Abstract
With regard to the multiple representation approach to text comprehension, a neglect of individual differences in research on the construction of mental models is noted. Effects of this neglect on theory development in text comprehension research are exemplified by analyzing the failed attempts to replicate so so-called crossover effect (Mani & Johnson-Laird, 1982). The crossover effect is often cited as evidence for the dissociability of text representations and model representations in the process of text comprehension. This chapter presents a series of studies investigating effects of three variables on the crossover of text and model representation: (a) determinateness of the description, (b) schematicity of the described situation, and (c) individual differences in readers’ visuospatial abilities. These studies demonstrated that the crossover effect can be replicated if individual differences in cognitive abilities necessary to construct spatial mental models are taken into account.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alarcon, M. & DeFries, J. C. (1997). Reading performance and general cognitive ability in twins with reading difficulties and control pairs. Personality and Individual Differences, 22, 793–803.
Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
Brewer, W. F. (1987). Schemas versus mental models in human memory. In P. Morris (Ed.), Modelling cognition (pp. 187–197). New York: Wiley.
Davey, B. & Menke, D. (1991). Individual differences affecting the acquisition of reading skill: A cognitive perspective. Reading Psychology, 12, 27–41.
De Jonge, P. & de Jonge, P. F. (1996). Working memory, intelligence and reading ability in children. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 1007–1020.
De Vega, M. (1994). Characters and their perspectives in narratives describing spatial environments. Psychological Research, 56, 116–126.
Dijk, T. A. van & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
Dutke, S. (1993). Mentale Modelle beim Erinnern sprachlich beschriebener räumlicher Anordnungen: Zur Interaktion von Gedächtnisschemata und Textrepräsentation [Mental models in recognizing verbally described spatial arrangements: Towards the interaction of schemata and text representation]. Zeitschrift für experimentelle und angewandte Psychologie, 40, 44–71.
Dutke, S. (1994a). Mental models in recognizing verbally described spatial arrangements: Towards the interaction of schemata and text representation. The German Journal of Psychology — Abstracts and Reviews, 18, 19–20.
Dutke, S. (1994b). Mentale Modelle beim Erinnern sprachlich beschriebener räumlicher Anordnungen: Zeitliche Aspekte der Modellkonstruktion und-nutzung [Mental models in recognizing verbally described spatial arrangements: Temporal aspects of model construction and use]. Zeitschrift für experimentelle und angewandte Psychologie, 41, 523–548.
Dutke, S. (1996). Generic and generative knowledge: Memory schemata in the construction of mental models. In W. Battmann & S. Dutke (Eds.), Processes of the molar regulation of behavior (pp. 35–54). Lengerich, Germany: Pabst Science Publishers.
Dutke, S. (1999). Der Crossover-Effekt von propositionaler Textrepräsentation und mentalem Modell: Zur Rolle interindividueller Fähigkeitsunterschiede [The crossover effect of propositional text representation and mental model: Toward the role of individual differences in ability]. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 46, 164–176.
Ehrlich, M. F., Kurtz-Costes, B., & Loridant, C. (1993). Cognitive and motivational determinants of reading comprehension in good and poor readers. Journal of Reading Behavior, 25, 365–381.
Eysenck, M. W. (1993). Principles of cognitive psychology. Hove, UK: Erlbaum.
Fletcher, C. R. & Chrysler, S. T. (1990). Surface forms, textbases, and situation models: Recognition memory for three types of textual information. Discourse Processes, 13, 175–190.
Garnham, A. (1987). Mental models as representations of discourse and text. Chichester, UK: Ellis Horwood.
Glenberg, A. M. & Langston, W. E. (1992). Comprehension of illustrated text: Pictures help to build mental models. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 129–151.
Glenberg, A. M. (1997). Mental models, space, and embodied cognition. In T. B. Ward, S. M. Smith, & J. Vaid (Eds.), Creative Thought. An investigation of conceptual structures and processes (pp. 495–522). Washington: American Psychological Association.
Glenberg, A. M., Kruley, P., & Langston, W. E. (1994). Analogical processes in comprehension. Simulation of a mental model. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 609–640). New York: Academic Press.
Glenberg, A. M., Meyer, M., & Lindem, K. (1987). Mental models contribute to foregrounding during text comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 69–83.
Haenggi, D., Gernsbacher, M. A., & Bolliger, C. A. (1994). Individual differences in situation-based inferencing during narrative text comprehension. In H. van Oostendorp & R. A. Zwaan (Eds.), Naturalistic text comprehension (pp. 79–96). Norwood, NJ.: Ablex.
Haenggi, D., Kintsch, W., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (1995). Spatial situation models and text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 19, 173–199.
Jäger, A. O. & Althoff, K. (1983). Der Wilde-Intelligenz-Test (WIT). Ein Strukturdiagnostikum [The Wilde Intelligence Test: A test of the structure of intelligence]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inferences, and consciousness. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1996). Images, models, and propositional representations. In M. de Vega, M. J. Intons-Peterson, P. N. Johnson-Laird, M. Denis, & M. Marschark (Eds.), Models of visuospatial cognition (pp. 90–127). New York: Oxford University Press.
Johnson-Laird, P. N., Byrne, R. M. J., & Schaeken, W. (1992). Propositional reasoning by model. Psychological Review, 99, 418–439.
Kaup, B., Kelter, S., Habel, C., & Clauser, C. (1997). Zur Wahl des repräsentierten Raumausschnitts beim Aufbau mentaler Modelle während der Textrezeption [Toward the choice of the represented spatial segment in the construction of mental models during text comprehension]. In C. Umbach, M. Grabski, & R. Hörnig (Eds.), Perspektive in Sprache und Raum. Aspekte von Repräsentation und Perspektivität (pp. 61–79). Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitäts Verlag.
Kelter, S. & Kaup, B. (1995). Räumliche Vorstellungen und Textverstehen. Neuere Entwicklungen der Theorie mentaler Modelle [Spatial images and text comprehension: New developments in mental model theory]. In B. Spillner (Ed.), Sprache, Verstehen und Verständlichkeit. Kongressbeiträge zur 25. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Angewandte Linguistik Gal e. V. (pp. 70–81). Frankfurt/M.: Lang.
Kintsch, W. (1996). Mental representations in cognitive science. In W. Battmann & S. Dutke (Eds.), Processes of the molar regulation of behavior (pp. 17–33). Lengerich, Germany: Pabst Science Publishers.
Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kintsch, W., Welsch, D., Schmalhofer, F. & Zimny, S. (1990). Sentence memory: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 133–159.
Längsten, W. E., Kramer, D. C, & Glenberg, A. M. (1998). The representation of space in mental models derived from text. Memory & Cognition, 26, 247–262.
Long, D. L., Oppy, B. J., & Seely, M. R. (1997). Individual differences in readers’ sentence-and text-level representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 129–145.
Lutz, M. F. & Radvansky, G. A. (1997). The fate of completed goal information in narrative comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 293–310.
Mani, K. & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1982). The mental representation of spatial descriptions. Memory and Cognition, 10, 181–187.
Manktelow, K. I. & Jones, J. (1987). Principles from the psychology of thinking and mental models. In M. M. Gardiner & B. Christie (Eds.), Applying cognitive psychology to user-interface design (pp. 83–117). Chichester: Wiley.
Oakhill, J. V, Cain, K., & Yuill, N. (1998). Individual differences in children’s comprehension skill: Toward an integrated model. In C. Hulme & J. R. Malatesha (Eds.), Reading and spelling: Development and disorders (pp. 343–367). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Payne, S. J. (1993). Memory for mental models of spatial descriptions: An episodic-construction-trace hypothesis. Memory and Cognition, 21, 591–603.
Perrig, W. J. & Kintsch, W. (1985). Propositional and situational representations of text. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 503–518.
Radvansky, G. A., Wyer, R. S., Curiel, J. M., & Lutz, M. F. (1997). Situation models and abstract ownership relations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1233–1246.
Rips, L. J. (1983). Cognitive Processes in propositional reasoning. Psychological Review, 90,38–71.
Rips, L. J. (1988). Deduction. In R. J. Sternberg & E. E. Smith (Eds.), The psychology of human thought (pp. 116–152). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Schaeken, W., Johnson-Laird, P. N., & d’Ydewalle, G. (1996). Mental models and temporal reasoning. Cognition, 60, 205–234.
Schmalhofer, F. & Glavanov, D. (1986). Three components of understanding a programmer’s manual: Verbatim, propositional, and situational representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 279–294.
Schnotz, W. (1988). Textverstehen als Aufbau mentaler Modelle [Text comprehension as construction of mental models]. In H. Mandi & H. Spada (Eds.), Wissenspsychologie (pp. 299–330). München: Psychologie Verlags Union.
Schnotz, W. (1993). Mentale Repräsentationen beim Sprachverstehen [Mental representations in language comprehension], Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 201, 237–259.
Segalowitz, N., O’Brien, I., & Poulsen, C. (1998). Evidence for a domain-specific component of attentional control in skilled performance. Brain and Cognition, 37, 129–132.
Tardieu, H., Ehrlich, M. F., & Gyselinck, V. (1992). Levels of representation and domain-specific knowledge in comprehension of scientific texts. Language and Cognitive Processes, 7, 335–351.
Williams, J. M. G., Watts, F. N., MacLeod, C. M., & Mathews, A. M. (1997). Cognitive Psychology and emotional disorders. Chichester: Wiley.
Zwaan, R. A. & Brown, C. M. (1996). The influence of language proficiency and comprehension skill on situation model construction. Discourse Processes, 21, 289–327.
Zwaan, R. A., Längsten, M. C. & Graesser, A. C. (1995). The construction of situation models in narrative comprehension: An event-indexing model. Psychological Science, 6, 292–297.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dutke, S. (2000). Multiple Representations and Individual Differences in Generating Mental Models: The Case of Text Comprehension. In: von Hecker, U., Dutke, S., Sedek, G. (eds) Generative Mental Processes and Cognitive Resources. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4373-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4373-8_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5880-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4373-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive