Skip to main content

Cognitive Prerequisites for Scaleable Data: A Model of Impression Formation

  • Chapter
Generative Mental Processes and Cognitive Resources
  • 111 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, formal requirements are specified which must hold for subject responses in attitudinal assessment or person perception, in order to satisfy certain levels of measurement. Ordinal, interval, and ratio scale levels are considered. Producing individual data on each of these levels is conceptualized as a set of cognitive tasks of increasing complexity. Models of these tasks are formalized as rules. Furthermore, the perceiver (or, the judging person) is assumed to possess a target-independent preference order with respect to different traits or features that might be observed in a person or object. Using pair comparison as the underlying method of data collection, the chapter shows how given subsets of traits will lead to evaluations about some target, and how comparisons between different targets can be made. Depending on the particular rules involved in these processes, the resulting comparison data may, across repeated judgments, satisfy a particular scale level, allowing to draw conclusions about the rules underlying those judgments. The effects of context information on target comparisons are discussed, and examples are introduced for all specified rules and scale levels. The general argument is made that formal measurement theory is a useful tool for impression formation and attitude research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, N. H. (1965). Averaging versus adding as a stimulus combination rule in impression formation. Journal of Experimental Psychology 70, 394–400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Asch, S. E. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41, 258–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashby, F. G. (Ed.). (1992). Multidimensional models of perception and cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bezembinder, T. & Acker, P. van (1980). Intransitivity in individual and social choice. In E. D. Lantermann & H. Feger (Eds.), Similarity and choice. Papers in honor of Clyde Coombs (pp. 208–233). Bern: Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierhoff, H. W. (1986). Personenwahrnehmung [Person perception]. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buxbaum, O. (1979). Kontexteffekte bei der Eindrucksbildung in der Personwahrnehmung [Context effects in impression formation in person perception]. Zeitschrift für experimentelle und angewandte Psychologie 26, 238–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dohmen, P., Doll, J., & Feger, H. (1989). A component theory for attitude objects. In A. Upmeyer (Ed.), Attitude and behavioral decisions (pp. 19–59). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Feger, H. (1979). Einstellungsstruktur und Einstellungsänderung: Ergebnisse, Probleme und ein Komponentenmodell der Einstellungsobjekte [Structure and change of attitude: Results, problems, and a component model of the objects of attitudes]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie 10, 331–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feger, H. (1987). Attitude theory and measurement. In G. R. Semin & B. Krahé (Eds.), Issues in contemporary German Social Psychology (pp. 156–174). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feger, H. (1994). Structure analysis of co-occurrence data. Aachen: Verlag Shaker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M. & Hunter, R. (1964). Summation versus balance in attitude organization and change. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 69, 505–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klauer, K. C. (1988). Eine Untersuchung zu einem linearen Modell dichotomer Komponenten [A study towards a linear model of dichotomous components]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie 19, 118–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krantz, D. H., Luce, D. R., Suppes, P., & Tversky, A. (1971). Foundations of measurement. Additive and polynomial representations (Vol. 1). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luce, R. D., Krantz, D. H., Suppes, P., & Tversky, A. (1990). Foundations of Measurement. Representation, axiomatization, and invariance (Vol. 3). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orth, B. 1974. Einführung in die Theorie des Messens [Introduction to the theory of measurement]. Stuttgart, Germany: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieger, M. (1997). Ein Modell der kognitiven Eindrucksbildung [A model of cognitive impression formation]. Semesterarbeit. Department of Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, F. S. (1979). Measurement theory with applications of decision making, utility, and the social sciences. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, E. (1977). Zur Angemessenheit von Integrationsmodellen in der sozialen Eindrucksbildung [Towards the adequacy of integrational models in social impression formation]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie 8, 247–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, D. (1964). Measurement structures and linear inequalities. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 1, 233–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suppes, P., Krantz, D. H., Luce, R. D., & Tversky, A. (1989). Foundations of measurement. Geometrical, threshold, and probabilistic representations (Vol. 2). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hubert Feger .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Feger, H. (2000). Cognitive Prerequisites for Scaleable Data: A Model of Impression Formation. In: von Hecker, U., Dutke, S., Sedek, G. (eds) Generative Mental Processes and Cognitive Resources. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4373-8_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4373-8_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5880-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4373-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics