Abstract
In this chapter, formal requirements are specified which must hold for subject responses in attitudinal assessment or person perception, in order to satisfy certain levels of measurement. Ordinal, interval, and ratio scale levels are considered. Producing individual data on each of these levels is conceptualized as a set of cognitive tasks of increasing complexity. Models of these tasks are formalized as rules. Furthermore, the perceiver (or, the judging person) is assumed to possess a target-independent preference order with respect to different traits or features that might be observed in a person or object. Using pair comparison as the underlying method of data collection, the chapter shows how given subsets of traits will lead to evaluations about some target, and how comparisons between different targets can be made. Depending on the particular rules involved in these processes, the resulting comparison data may, across repeated judgments, satisfy a particular scale level, allowing to draw conclusions about the rules underlying those judgments. The effects of context information on target comparisons are discussed, and examples are introduced for all specified rules and scale levels. The general argument is made that formal measurement theory is a useful tool for impression formation and attitude research.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anderson, N. H. (1965). Averaging versus adding as a stimulus combination rule in impression formation. Journal of Experimental Psychology 70, 394–400.
Asch, S. E. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41, 258–290.
Ashby, F. G. (Ed.). (1992). Multidimensional models of perception and cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bezembinder, T. & Acker, P. van (1980). Intransitivity in individual and social choice. In E. D. Lantermann & H. Feger (Eds.), Similarity and choice. Papers in honor of Clyde Coombs (pp. 208–233). Bern: Huber.
Bierhoff, H. W. (1986). Personenwahrnehmung [Person perception]. Berlin: Springer.
Buxbaum, O. (1979). Kontexteffekte bei der Eindrucksbildung in der Personwahrnehmung [Context effects in impression formation in person perception]. Zeitschrift für experimentelle und angewandte Psychologie 26, 238–260.
Dohmen, P., Doll, J., & Feger, H. (1989). A component theory for attitude objects. In A. Upmeyer (Ed.), Attitude and behavioral decisions (pp. 19–59). New York: Springer.
Feger, H. (1979). Einstellungsstruktur und Einstellungsänderung: Ergebnisse, Probleme und ein Komponentenmodell der Einstellungsobjekte [Structure and change of attitude: Results, problems, and a component model of the objects of attitudes]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie 10, 331–349.
Feger, H. (1987). Attitude theory and measurement. In G. R. Semin & B. Krahé (Eds.), Issues in contemporary German Social Psychology (pp. 156–174). London: Sage.
Feger, H. (1994). Structure analysis of co-occurrence data. Aachen: Verlag Shaker.
Fishbein, M. & Hunter, R. (1964). Summation versus balance in attitude organization and change. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 69, 505–510.
Klauer, K. C. (1988). Eine Untersuchung zu einem linearen Modell dichotomer Komponenten [A study towards a linear model of dichotomous components]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie 19, 118–130.
Krantz, D. H., Luce, D. R., Suppes, P., & Tversky, A. (1971). Foundations of measurement. Additive and polynomial representations (Vol. 1). New York: Academic Press.
Luce, R. D., Krantz, D. H., Suppes, P., & Tversky, A. (1990). Foundations of Measurement. Representation, axiomatization, and invariance (Vol. 3). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Orth, B. 1974. Einführung in die Theorie des Messens [Introduction to the theory of measurement]. Stuttgart, Germany: Kohlhammer.
Rieger, M. (1997). Ein Modell der kognitiven Eindrucksbildung [A model of cognitive impression formation]. Semesterarbeit. Department of Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin.
Roberts, F. S. (1979). Measurement theory with applications of decision making, utility, and the social sciences. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Rosch, E. (1977). Zur Angemessenheit von Integrationsmodellen in der sozialen Eindrucksbildung [Towards the adequacy of integrational models in social impression formation]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie 8, 247–255.
Scott, D. (1964). Measurement structures and linear inequalities. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 1, 233–247.
Suppes, P., Krantz, D. H., Luce, R. D., & Tversky, A. (1989). Foundations of measurement. Geometrical, threshold, and probabilistic representations (Vol. 2). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Feger, H. (2000). Cognitive Prerequisites for Scaleable Data: A Model of Impression Formation. In: von Hecker, U., Dutke, S., Sedek, G. (eds) Generative Mental Processes and Cognitive Resources. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4373-8_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4373-8_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5880-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4373-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive