Skip to main content

Genotoxicity in German Surface Waters — Results of a Collaborative Study

  • Chapter
Environmental Challenges

Abstract

As surface waters are widely used for the preparation of drinking water, appropriate test systems are required for the monitoring of possible genotoxic contaminations. In the course of a BMBF-funded collaborative project several methods (Ames test, umu test, alkaline elution, DNA unwinding assay, Comet assay and unscheduled DNA-synthesis test) have been examined for their ability to measure genotoxicity particularly in natural surface waters. The project was subdivided into two parts: In the first part appropriate test versions were developed (sensitized Ames test, luminometric umu test, alkaline elution using clams, Comet assay with fish cells or aquatic plants), adapted to the test subject and validated regarding their sensitivity towards standard genotoxins. All test results were statistically evaluated. In the course of the second part both natural and concentrated samples of the rivers Rhine, Elbe, Mulde, Wupper and one drinking water resource (Wahnbachbarrage) were tested. In parallel all samples were chemically analyzed. Among the unconcentrated samples several statistically positive test results were obtained both for the rivers Elbe and Rhine especially with the Ames test and the Comet assay. Only one river (Wupper) showed significant genotoxicity in the umu test. In this case chemical analysis revealed concentrations of about 41 and 47 μg/1 of fluoroquinolonic acid, a bacterial gyrase inhibitor which may be responsible for this effect. No genotoxicity could be found in the drinking water resource even after concentration. The water extracts clearly showed different background genotoxicity in the umu test corresponding to increased pollution along the Rhine (Karlsruhe < Köln < Düsseldorf). The eucaryotic in vitro tests revealed comparable results with nonconcentrated water samples. As a conclusion of the study we propose a graduated testing battery consisting of a bacterial (umu or Ames test) and an eucaryotic test like the Comet assay or the alkaline elution assay followed by an additional eucaryotic test (UDS test or micronucleus test) in a decisive function. There is a need for further evaluation by effect-orientated chemical analysis which should be done in the case of positive genotoxicity results in at least two tests or persistent positive results in only one.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, S. L and Wild, G. C.: 1994, Environ. Health Perspect. 102, 9–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claxton, L. D., Houk, V. S. and Hughes, T. J.: 1998, Mutation Res. 410, 237–243.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • DIN 38415-3/12.96, Deutsche Einheitsverfahren zur Wasser-, Abwasser und Schlammuntersuchung — Suborganismische Testverfahren (Gruppe T) — Teil 3: Bestimmung des erbgutverändernden Potentials von Wasser-und Abwasserinhaltsstoffen mit dem umu-Test.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chetelat, A., Albertini, S. and Gocke, E.: 1996, Mutagenesis 11, 497–504

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gebel, T.: 1997, Chem. Biol. Interact. 107, 131–144.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, K. W.: 1991, Pharmac. Ther. 49, 55–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, L. E., Smith, A. H., Hopenhayn-Rich, C., Biggs, M. L., Kaiman, D. A. and Smith, M. T.: 1997a, Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 6, 31–36.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, L. E., Smith, A. H., Hopenhayn-Rich, C., Biggs, M. L., Kaiman, D. A. and Smith, M. T.: 1997b, Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 6, 1051–1056.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oda, Y., Nakamura, S-I., Oki, I, Kato, T. and Shinagawa, H. 1985, Mutation Res. 147, 219–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shinagawa, H., Kato, T., Ise, T., Makino, K. and Nakata, A.: 1983, Gene 23, 167–174.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. H., Hopenhayn,-Rich, C., Warner, M., Biggs, M. L., Moore, L. and Smith, M. T.: 1993, J. Toxicol. Environ. Health 40, 223–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weßler, H. and Obst, U.: 1999, Abschlußbericht BMBF-Projekt 02-WU9553/1

    Google Scholar 

  • White, P. A. and Rasmussen, J. B.: 1998, Mutation Res. 410, 223–236.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Reifferscheid, G., Grummt, T. (2000). Genotoxicity in German Surface Waters — Results of a Collaborative Study. In: Belkin, S. (eds) Environmental Challenges. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4369-1_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4369-1_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5878-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4369-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics