Abstract
A 58 year old physician, one of the pioneers in introducing peritoneal dialysis for chronic renal failure, consistently coerces his patients into maintenance peritoneal dialysis rather that maintenance hemodialysis. By contrast, another nephrologist at the same facility, who is expert in hemodialysis, does not even consider peritoneal dialysis in the choices presented to newly uremic patients. At some facilities, home hemodialysis is not mentioned, while at a few others, home hemodialysis is promoted as the therapy most likely to permit long survival during maximized rehabilitation. A renal fellow observing the conflicting “hard sells” remarked to the chief of medicine that patients were being denied their rights under pressure to accept one therapy over another.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Friedman, E.A. (2000). Physician Bias. In: Friedman, E.A. (eds) Legal and Ethical Concerns in Treating Kidney Failure. Legal and Ethical Concerns in Medicine, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4355-4_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4355-4_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5875-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4355-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive