Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Intonation pp 13–52Cite as

Intonation: Past, Present, Future

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Text, Speech and Language Technology ((TLTB,volume 15))

Abstract

I do not intend to draw up an inventory of the past and present publications on intonation. Partial or exhaustive references can be found in (1970), (1975), (1976), (1979), (1981), (1984), (1986), (1996), (1997), (1998), (1999). It would require a huge amount of effort to go back and look for past studies on prosody or intonation, which have been increasing exponentially in number over the years. Such a historical overview is beyond the scope of this paper. But it would be worth reporting the milestones which contain the seeds of the concepts underlying current theories on intonation and explain their development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abe, I. 1955. Intonational patterns in English and Japanese. Word 11, 386–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altmann, H. (ed.). 1988. Intonationsforschungen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arvaniti, A. 1994. Acoustic features of Greek rhythmic structures. Journal of Phonetics 22, 239–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aubergé, V. 1992. Developing a structured lexicon for synthesis of prosody. In Bailly et al. (eds.), 307–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avesani, C. 1990. A Contribution to the Synthesis of Italian Intonation. Proc. ICSLP’ 90 (Kobe, Japan), vol. 2, 833–836.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avesani, C, J. Hirschberg and P. Prieto. 1995. The intonation disambiguation of potentially ambiguous utterances in English, Italian, and Spanish. Proc. 13th ICPhS (Stockholm, Sweden), vol. 1, 144–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailly, G., C. Benoît and T. Sawallis (eds.). 1992. Talking Machines: Theories, Models and Designs. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakenecker, G., U. Block, A. Batliner, R. Kompe, E. NÖth and P. Regel-Brietzmann. 1994. Improving parsing by incorporating “prosodic clause boundaries” into grammar. Proc. ICSLP’ 94 (Yokohama, Japan), vol. 3, 1115–1118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bannert, R. 1983. Modellskizze für die Deutsche Intonation. Zeitschrift fÖr Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 49, 9–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bannert, R. 1995. Variations in the perceptual modelling of macro-prosodic organisation of spoken Swedish: prominence and chunking. (Reports from the Department of Phonetics, Urneå University) PHONUM 3, 31–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartkova, K. and C. Sorin. 1987. A model of segmental duration for speech synthesis in French. Speech Communication 6, 245–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckman, M.E. 1986. Stress and Non-Stress Accent. Dordrecht: Foris.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beckman, M.E. 1993. Modelling the production of prosody. Working Papers 41, 258–263. Dept of Linguistics and Phonetics, Lund University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckman, M.E. and J. Edwards. 1990. Lenghtenings and shortenings and the nature of prosodic constituency. In Kingston and Beckman (eds.), 152–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckman, M.E. and J.P. Pierrehumbert. 1986. Intonational structure in Japanese and English. Phonology Yearbook 3, 255–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkovits, R. 1993. Utterance-final lengthening and the duration of final stop closures. Journal of Phonetics 21, 479–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertinetto, P. M. 1979. Aspetti Prosodici della Lingua Italiana. Padova: Clesp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierwish, M. 1966. Regeln für die Intonation deutscher Säe. Studia Grammatica 7, 92–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloomfield, L. 1935. Language. London: George Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolinger, D.L. 1951. Intonation: levels versus configurations. Word 7, 199–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolinger, D.L. 1958. A theory of pitch accent in English. Word 14, 109–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolinger, D.L. 1965. Forms of English: Accent, Morpheme, Order. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolinger, D.L. 1970. Relative Height. Prosodic feature analysis. Studia Phonetica 3, 109–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolinger, D.L. (ed.). 1972. Intonation. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolinger, D.L. 1985. Two views of accent. Journal of Linguistics 21, 79–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booj G. and J. van Marie (eds.). 1993. Yearbook of Morphology. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Botinis, A. 1989. Stress and Prosodie Structure in Greek. Lund University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Botinis, A. 1992. Accentual distribution in Greek discourse. Travaux de l’Institut de Phonétique d’Aix 14, 13–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouquet, S. 1997. Introduction à la Lecture de Saussure. Paris: Payot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brazil, D., M. Coulthard and C. Johns. 1980. Discourse Intonation and Language Teaching. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnan, J. 1971. Sentence stress and syntactic transformations. Language 47, 357-281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnan, J. 1972. Stress and syntax: a reply. Language 48, 326–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G. 1983. Prosodie structure and the given/new distinction. In Cutler and Ladd (eds.), 66–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, G. 1977. Swedish Word Accents in Sentence Perspective. Lund: Gleerup.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, G. and E. Gåding. 1978. A prosodie typology for Swedish dialects. Nordic Prosody, 219–228. Dept of Linguistics and phonetics, Lund University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, G., B. GranstrÖm, K. Gustafson and D. House. 1993. Phrasing strategies in prosodie parsing and speech. Proc. EUROSPEECH’ 93 (Berlin, Germany), 1205–1208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, G., U. Willstedt and P. Touati. 1990. On Swedish interactive prosody: Analysis and synthesis. Nordic Prosody V, 36–48. Turku University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butterworth, B. (ed). 1980. Language production 1, Speech and talk. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caelen, G. Forthcoming. Prosodie et Sens. Paris: Editions du CNRS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, N. 1993. Automatic detection of prosodic boundaries in speech. Speech Communication 13, 343–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carbonnel, N., J.P. Haton, F. Lonchamp and J.M. Pierrel. 1982. Elaboration expérimentale d’indices prosodiques pour la reconnaissance: application à l’analyse syntaxico-sémantique dans le syst è me Myrtille IL Actes du Séminaire Prosodie et Reconnaissance Automatique de la Parole (Aix-en-provence), 59–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, N.-C. 1958. Tones and intonation in the Chengdu dialect, Szechuan, China. Phonetica 2, 59–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chao, Y.R. 1933. Tone and intonation in Chinese. Bulletin of the National Research Institute of History and Philology of the Academia Sinica 4, 124–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. 1962. The logical basis of linguistic theory. Proc. 9th ICL (Cambridge, MA., USA), 914–1008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen P.R., L Morgan and M.E. Pollack (eds.). 1990. Intentions in Communication. Cambridge, Mass. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A. and J.’T Hart. 1965. Perceptual analysis of intonation patterns. Proc. 5th ICA (Liège, Belgium) 1A, A16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A., and S.G. Nooteboom (eds.). 1975. Structure and Process in Speech Perception. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Collier, R. 1992. A comment on the prediction of prosody. In Bailly et al. (eds.), 205–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, R. and J.’T Hart. 1975. The role of intonation in speech perception. In Cohen and Nooteboom (eds.), 107–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper-Kuhlen, E. 1986. An introduction to English Prosody. London: Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruttenden, A. 1986. Intonation. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W. and J. Paccia-Cooper. 1980. Syntax and Speech. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruttenden, A. 1992. The origins of nucleus. Journal of the International Phonetics Association 20, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crystal, D. 1969. Prosodic Systems and Intonation in English. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crystal, D. and R. Quirk. 1964. Systems of Prosodie and Paralinguistic Features in English. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, A., D. Dahan and W. van Danselaar. 1997. Prosody in the comprehension of spoken language: a literature review. Language and Speech 40, 141–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, A. and S.D. Isard. 1980. The production of prosody. In Butterworth (ed), 245–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, A. and D.R. Ladd (eds.). 1983. Prosody: Models and Measurements. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daneš, F. 1960. Sentence intonation from a functional point of view. Word 16, 34–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daneš, F. 1967. Order of elements and sentence intonation. In To Honour of Roman Jakobson, 499–512. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Groot, A.W. 1945. L’intonation de la phrase néerlandaise et allemande considérée du point de vue de la linguistique structurale. Cahiers Ferdinand de Saussure 5, 17–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delattre, P. 1962. A comparative study of declarative intonation in American English and Spanish. Hispania XLV, vol. 2, 233–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denes, P. 1959. A preliminary investigation of certain aspects of intonation. Language and Speech 2, 106–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Cristo, A. 1975. Soixante et Dix Ans de Recherche en Prosodie. Editions de l’Université de Provence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Cristo, A. 1981. L’intonation est congruente à la syntaxe: une confirmation. In Rossi etal (eds.). 272–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Cristo, A. 1998. Intonation in French. In Hirst and Di Cristo (eds.), 195–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Cristo, A. and D.J. Hirst. 1993. Rythme syllabique. rythme mélodique et représentation hiérarchique de la prosodie du français. Travaux de l’Institut de Phonétique d’Aix 15, 9–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Cristo, A. and D.J. Hirst. Forthcoming. L’accentuation non emphatique en français: stratégies et paramètres. Hommages I. FÖnagy. Paris: L’Harmattan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Cristo, A., J.P Haton, M. Rossi and J. Vaissière (eds.). 1982. Prosodie et Reconnaissance Automatique de la Parole (Actes du Colloque Prosodie et reconnaissance, Aix-en Provence, France).

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Cristo. A. and D.J. Hirst. 1996. Vers une typologie des unités intonatives du français. XXIièmes Journées d’ É tudes sur la Parole (Avignon, France), 10–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eco, U. 1988. Trattato di Semiotica Generale. Milano: Bompiani.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fant, G. and A. Kruckenberg. 1994. Notes on stress and word accent in Swedish. STL-QPSR 2-3, 125–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fant, G., A. Kruckenberg and L. Nord. 1991. Durational correlates of stress in Swedish, French and English. Journal of Phonetics 19, 351–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farnetani, E. and S. Kori. 1983. Interaction of syntactic structure and rhythmical constraints on the realisation of word prosody. Quaderni del Centro di Ricerca di Fonetica di Padova 2, 287–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faure, G. 1962. Recherches sur les Caractères et le Rôle des Éléments Musicaux dans la Prononciation Anglaise. Paris: Didier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Féry, C. 1993. German Intonational Patterns. Tübingen: Niemeyer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • FÖnagy, I. 1952. Accent et intonation du français moderne. Grammaire Descriptive du Français Moderne. Budapest, 62–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • FÖnagy, I. 1967. L’intonation du Hongrois. Budapest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fretheim, T. and R.A. Nilsen. 1993. How to tell H% from L% in right-detached expressions in Norwegian. Working Papers 41, 58–65. Dept of Linguistics and Phonetics, Lund University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry, D.B. 1960. Linguistic theory and experimental research. Transactions of the Philological Society, 13–39. (Reprinted in Jones and Laver (eds.), 66-87).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry, D.B. 1967. The present-day tasks of the phonetic sciences. Proc. 6th ICPhS (Prague, Czechoslovakia), 87–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujisaki, H. 1981. Dynamic characteristics of voice fundamental frequency in speech and singing. Proc. 4th FASE Symposium (Venice, Italy), 57–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujisaki, H. 1997. Prosody model and spontaneous speech. In Sagisaka et al. (eds.), 27–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujisaki, H., K. Hirose and K. Ohta. 1979. Acoustic features of the fundamental frequency contours of declarative sentences in Japanese. Ann. Bull. Res. Inst. Logopedics and Phoniatrics 13, 163–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gårding, E. 1983. A generative model of intonation. In Cutler and Ladd (eds.), 11–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gårding, E. 1990. West Swedish and East Norwegian intonation. Nordic Prosody V, 111–129. Turku University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gårding, E. 1992. Focal domains and their tonal manifestations in some Swedish dialects. Nordic Prosody VI, 65–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gårding, E. 1993. On parameters and principles in intonation analysis. Working Papers 40, 25–47. Dept of Linguistics and Phonetics, Lund University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gårding, E. 1994. Prosody in Lund. Speech Communication 15, 59–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gårding, E. A. Botinis, and P. Touati. 1982. A comparative study of Swedish, Greek and French intonation. Working Papers 22, 137–152. Dept of Linguistics and Phonetics, Lund University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrido, J.M. 1993. Analysis of global pitch contour domains at paragraph level in Spanish reading text. Working Papers 41, 104–107. Dept of Linguistics and Phonetics, Lund University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geoffrois, E. 1995. Extraction Robuste de Paramètres Prosodiques pour la Reconnaissance de la Parole. PhD dissertation, Université de ParisXI-Orsay.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbon, D. 1976. Perspectives of Intonation Analysis. Bern: Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, J.A. 1976. Autosegmental Phonology. PhD dissertation, MIT (published 1979, New York: Garland).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, J.A. (ed.), 1995. The Handbook of Phonological Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabe, E. 1998. Comparative Intonational Phonology, English and German. PhD dissertation, Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen.

    Google Scholar 

  • GranstrÖm, B. 1997. Applications of intonation-an overview. Proc. ESCA Workshop on Intonation (Athens, Greece), 21–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grice, M. 1995. The Intonation of Interrogation in Palermo Italian: Implications for Intonation Theory. Tübingen: Niemeyer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grønnum (Thorsen), N. 1992. The Groundworks of Danish Intonation. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grønnum (Thorsen), N. 1995. Superposition and subordination in intonation. A nonlinear approach. Proc. 13th ICPhS (Stockholm, Sweden), vol. 2, 124–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grønnum (Thorsen), N. 1998. A critical remark on D.R. Ladd’s Intonational Phonology. Journal of Phonetics 26, 109–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grosjean, F. 1983. How long is the sentence? Prediction and prosody in the on-line processing of language. Linguistics 21, 501–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grosz, B.J. and J. Hirschberg. 1992. Some intonational characteristics of discourse structure. Proc. ICSLP’ 92 (Banff, Canada), vol. 1, 429–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosz, B.J. and C.L. Sidner. 1986. Attention, intentions, and the structure of discourse. Computational Linguistics 12, 175–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gussenhoven, C. 1983. Focus, mode and the nucleus. Journal of Linguistics 19, 377–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gussenhoven, C. 1984. On the Grammar and Semantics of Sentence Accents. Dordrecht: Foris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gussenhoven, C. 1985. Two views of accent: a reply. Journal of Linguistics 21, 125–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gussenhoven, C. 1990. Tonal association domains and the prosodic hierarchy in English. In Ramsaran (ed.), 21–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gussenhoven, C, D.L. Bolinger and C. Kejsper. 1987. On accent. Bloomington: IULC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadding-Koch, K. 1961. Acoustico-phonetic Studies in the Intonation of Southern Swedish. Lund: Gleerup.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadding-Koch, K. and M. Studdert-Kennedy. 1964. An experimental study of some intonation contours. Phonetica 11, 175–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M.A.K. 1967. Intonation and Grammar in British English. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, Z.S. 1951. Structural Linguistics. The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart’t, J. Collier, R. and A. Cohen. 1990. A Perceptual Study of Intonation. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haugen, E. and M. Joos. 1953. Tone and intonation in East Norwegian. Acta Philologica Scandinavica 22, 41–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, B. and A. Lahiri 1991. Bengali intonational phonology. Natural Language and Linguistic theory 9, 47–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hess, W. 1983. Pitch Determination of Speech Signals. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hess, W., A. Batliner, A. Kiessling, R. Kompe, E. NÖth, A. Petzold, M. Reyelt and V. Strom. 1997. Prosodie modules for speech recognition and understanding in Verbomobil. In Sagisaka et al (ed.), 361–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heuft, B., T. Portele, J. Krämer, H. Meyer, M. Rauth and G. Sonntag. 1995. Parametric description of F0-contours in a prosodie database. Proc. 13th ICPhS (Stockholm, Sweden), vol. 2, 378–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschberg, J. and C. Nakatani. 1996. A prosodie analysis of discourse segments in direction-giving monologues. Proc. 34th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Santa Cruz, CA., USA), 286–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschberg, J. and J.P. Pierrehumbert. 1986. The intonational structuring of discourse. Proc. 24th Association for Computational Linguistics (Santa Cruz, CA., USA), vol. 24, 136–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, D.J. 1991. Intonation models: towards a third generation. Proc. 12th ICPhS (Aix-en-Provence, France), vol. 1, 305–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, D.J. 1992. Prediction of prosody: an overview. In Bailly et al (eds.), 199–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, D.J. 1993a. Peak, boundary and cohesion characteristics of prosodic grouping. Working Papers 41, 32–37. Dept of Linguistics and Phonetics, Lund University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, D.J. 1993b. Detaching intonational phrases from syntactic structure. Linguistic Inquiry 24, 781–788.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, D.J. and A. Di Cristo. 1984. French intonation: a parametric approach. Di Neueren Sprache Bd 83, Heft 5, 554–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, D.J. and A. Di Cristo. 1998. A survey of intonation systems. In Hirst and Di Cristo (eds.), 1–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, DJ. and A. Di Cristo, (eds.). 1998. Intonation Systems. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, D.J., A. Di Cristo and R. Espesser. Forthcoming. Levels of representation and levels of analysis for the description of linguistic systems. In HÖrne (ed.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjelmslev, L. 1943. Prolegomena to a Theory of Language. Reproduced by University of Wisconsin Press, Madison. (Translated by F.J. Whitfield, 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  • HÖrne, M.A. 1987. Towards a discourse-based model of English sentence intonation. Working Papers 32, 1–36. Dept of Linguistics and Phonetics, Lund University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Home, M. (ed). Forthcoming. Prosody: Theory and Experiment. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Home, M., M. Filipsson, C. Johansson, M. Ljungqvist and A. LindstrÖm. 1993. Improving the prosody in TTS systems. Working Papers 41, 208–211. Dept of Linguistics and Phonetics, Lund University.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, D. 1990. Tonal Perception in Speech. Lund University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, A. 1997. Training prosody-syntax recognition models without prosodic labels. Proc. ICSLP’ 94 (Yokohama, Japan), vol. 3, 1119–1122 (also in Sagisaka et al. (eds.), 309-326)

    Google Scholar 

  • Inkelas, S. and D. Zee. 1990. The Phonology-syntax Connection. The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inkelas, S. and D. Zec. 1995. Syntax-phonology interface. In Goldsmith (ed.) 1995, 535–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isacenko, A.V. and HJ. Shädlich. 1963. Erzeugung künstlicher deutscher Satzintonationen mit zwei kontrastierenden Tonstufen. Monatsberichte der Deutschen Akademie der Wissenschaften su Berlin 5-6, 365–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jassem, W. 1952. The Intonation of Conversational English. Wroclaw: Wroclawskie Towarzystwo Naukow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones W.E. and J. Laver (eds.). 1973. Phonetics in Linguistics. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jun, S.-A. 1993. The Phonetics and Phonology of Korean Prosody. PhD dissertation. The Ohio State University (published 1996, New York: Garland).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaisse, E.M. 1985. Connected Speech: The Interaction of Syntax and Phonology. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaisse, E.M. and P.A. Shaw. 1985. On the theory of lexical phonology. Phonology Yearbook 2, 2–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karcevskij, S. 1931. Sur la phonologie de la phrase. Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague 4, 188–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keijsper, C.E. 1987. Two views of accent: a third opinion. In Gussenhoven et al. (eds.), 162–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingdon, R. 1958. The Groundwork of English Intonation. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingston, J. and M.E. Beckman (eds.). 1990. Papers in Laboratory Phonology I. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klatt, D.H. 1975. Vowel lengthening is syntactically determined in a connected discourse. Journal of Phonetics 3, 129–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler, K. 1995. A language science in its own right? Proc. 13th ICPhS (Stockholm, Sweden), vol. 1, 10–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • KÖhler, K. 1997. Modelling prosody in spontaneous speech. In Sagisaka et al. (eds.), 187–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacheret, A. and Beaugendre, F. 1999. La Prosodie du Français. Paris: Editions du CNRS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, D.R. 1996. Intonational Phonology. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, D.R. 1998. A critical remark on Intonational Phonology: response to Nina Grønnum. Journal of Phonetics 26, 113–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, D.R. and N. Campbell. 1991. Theories of prosodic structure: evidence from syllable duration. Proc. 12th ICPhS (Aix en Provence, France), 290–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laniran, Y.O. 1992. Intonation in Tone Languages: The Phonetic Implementation of Tones in Yoruba. PhD dissertation, University of Cornell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lea, W.A. 1972. Intonational Cues to the Constituent Structure and Phonemics of Spoken English. PhD dissertation, University of Purdue.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lea, W.A. 1980. Prosodic aids to speech recognition. In Lea (ed.), 166–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lea, W.A. (ed.). 1980. Trends in Speech Recognition. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leben, W.R. 1973. Suprasegmental Phonology. PhD dissertation, MIT (published 1989, New York: Garland).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehiste, I. 1970. Suprasegmentals. Cambridge, Mass. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehiste, I. 1973a. Phonetic disambiguation of syntactic ambiguity. Glossa 7, 107–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehiste, I. 1973b. Rhythmic units and syntactic units in production and perception. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 54, 1228–1234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Léon, P. 1971. Où en sont les études sur l’intonation?. Proc. 7th ICPhS (Montreal, Canada), 113–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Léon, P. and Ph. Martin. 1970. Prolégomènes à l’étude des structures intonatives. Studia Phonetica 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liberman, M.Y. 1975. The Intonational System of English. PhD dissertation, MIT (published 1978 by IULC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Liberman, M. Y. and A. Prince. 1977. On stress and linguistic rhythm. Linguistic Inquiry 8, 249–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, Ph. and S.B. Michaels. 1962. Some aspects of fundamental frequency and envelope amplitude as related to the emotional content of speech. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 34, 922–927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magno Caldognetto, E., F. Ferrero, C. Lavagnoli and K. Vagges. 1978. Fo contours of statements, yes-no questions and WH-questions of two regional varieties of Italian. Journal of Italian Linguistics 3, 57–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Ph. 1981. Pour une théorie de l’intonation. In Rossi et al. (eds.), 234–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinet, A. 1961. A Functional View of Language. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathesius, V. 1937. K teorii vetné intonace. Slovo a Slovesnost 3, 248–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J.J and A. Prince. 1993. Generalised alignment. In Booj and van Marie (eds.), 79–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mennen, I. and E. den Os. 1993. Intonation of Modern Greek sentences. Proc. Institute of Phonetic sciences 17, 111–128. University of Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mertens, P. 1993. Intonational grouping, boundaries, and syntactic structure in French. Working Papers 41, 156–159. Dept of Linguistics and Phonetics, Lund University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mettas, O. 1963. Etudes sur les facteurs ectosémantiques de l’intonation en français. Travaux de Linguistique et de Littérature de Strasbourg 1, 143–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mixdorff, H. 1997. Intonation Patterns of German-model-based Quantitative Analysis and Synthesis of Fo Contours. PhD dissertation. Technical University Dresden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mixdorff, H. and H. Fujisaki. 1995. Production and perception of statement, question, non-terminal intonation in German. Proc. 13th ICPhS (Stockholm, Sweden), vol. 2, 410–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Möbius, B. 1993. Ein Quantitatives Modell der Deutschen Intonation. Analyse und Synthese von Grundfrequenzverläufen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Möbius, B. 1995. Components of a quantitative model of German intonation. Proc. 13th ICPhS (Stockholm, Sweden), vol. 2, 108–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagano-Madsen, Y. 1992. Mora and Prosodic Coordination. Lund University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nespor, M. and I. Vogel. 1986. Prosodic Phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, J.D. and J.F. Arnold. 1961. Intonation of Colloquial English. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Shaughnessy, D. and J. Allen. 1983. Linguistic modality effects on fundamental frequency in speech.. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 74, 1155–1171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohala, J. 1991. The integration of phonetics and phonology. Proc. 12th ICPhS (Aix-en-Provence, France), 2–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Öhman, S.E.G. 1967. Word and sentence intonation: a quantitative model. STL-QPSR 2-3, 20–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostendorf, M.F. 1998. Linking speech recognition and language processing through prosody. CCAI 15(3), 255–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostendorf, M.F., PJ. Price and S. Shattuck-Hufnagel. 1993. Combining statistical and linguistic methods for modelling prosody. Working Papers 41, 272–275. Dept of Linguistics and Phonetics, Lund University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, H.E. 1922. English Intonation with Systematic Exercises. Cambridge: Heffer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierrehumbert, J.B. 1980. The Phonology and Phonetics of English Intonation. PhD dissertation, MIT (published 1988 by IULC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierrehumbert, J.B. and M.E. Beckman. 1988. Japanese Tone Structure. Cambridge, Mass. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierrehumbert, J.B. and J. Hirschberg. 1990. The meaning of intonation contours in the interpretation of discourse. In Cohen, Morgan and Pollack (eds.), 271–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pijper de, J.R. and A.A. Sanderman. 1994. On the perceptual strength of prosodic boundaries and its relation to suprasegmental cues. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 96, 2037–2047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pike, K. 1945. The Intonation of American English. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pike, K. 1964. On the grammar of intonation. Proc. 5th ICPhS (Münster, Germany), 105–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poser, W. 1984. The phonetics and Phonology of Tone and Intonation in Japanese. PhD dissertation, MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potapova, R.K. 1997. Connotative Paralinguistics. Moscow: Triada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, P.J., M.F. Ostendorf, S. Shattuck-Hufnagel and C. Fong. 1991. The use of prosody in syntactic disambiguation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 90, 2956–2970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsaran, S. (ed.). 1990. Studies in the Pronunciation in English. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, M. 1965. Contribution à l’étude des faits prosodiques dans un parler d’Italie du Nord. Revue Langage et Comportement 1, 5–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, M. 1985. L’intonation et l’organisation de l’énoncé. Phonetica 42, 135–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, M. 1993. A model for predicting the prosody of spontaneous speech (PPSS model). Speech Communication 13, 87–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, M. 1995. A Principle-based model for predicting the prosody of speech. In Sorin et al. (eds.), 159–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, M. 1995. The evolution of phonetics: a fundamental and applied science. Speech Communication 18, 96–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, M. 1997a. Intonation: past, present, future. Proc. ESCA Workshop on Intonation (Athens, Greece), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, M. 1997b. Is syntactic structure prosodically recoverable? Proc. EUROSPEECH’ 97 (Rhodes, Greece), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, M. 1999. L’Intonation, le Système du Français: Description et Modélisation. Paris: Ophrys.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, M., A. Di Cristo, D. Hirst, Ph. Martin and Y. Nishinuma. 1981. L’Intonation, de l’Acoustique à la Sémantique. Paris: Klincksieck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rump, H.H. and R. Collier. 1996. Focus conditions and the Prominence of Pitch-Accented Syllables. Language and Speech 39, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Safir, K. 1985. Binding in relatives and LF. Glow Newsletter 14, 77–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagisaka, Y., N. Campbell and N. Higuchi (eds.). 1997. Computing Prosody. New York: 9-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanderman, A.A. 1996. Prosodic Phrasing. PhD dissertation, Eindhoven University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanderman, A.A. and R. Collier. 1996. Prosodic rules for the implementation of phrase boundaries in synthetic speech. J. Acous. Soc. Am. 100, 3390–3397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schubiger, M. 1958. English Intonation, its Form and Function. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scripture, E.W. 1902. The Elements of Experimental Phonetics. London: Edward Arnold. (Reprinted by J.W. Black. Columbus: The Ohio state University, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  • Selkirk, E.O. 1984. Phonology and Syntax: The Relation Between Sound and Structure. Cambridge, Mass. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selkirk, E.O. 1990. On the nature of prosodie constituency: comments on Beckman and Edwards paper. In Kingston and Beckman (eds.), 179–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selkirk, E.O. 1995. Sentence prosody: intonation, stress and phrasing. In Goldsmith (ed.), 550–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaumjan, S.K. 1968. Problems of Theoretical Phonology. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaumjan, S.K. 1971. Principles of Structural Linguistics. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sluijter, A.M.C. and V. van Heuven. 1993. Perceptual cues of linguistic stress: intensity revisited. Working Papers 41, 246–249. Dept of Linguistics and Phonetics, Lund University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorin, C, J. Mariani, H. Meloni and J. Schoentgen (eds.) 1995. Levels in Speech Communication: Relations and Interactions, A Tribute to Max Wajskop. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sosa, J.M. 1991. Fonetica y Fonologia de la Entonacion del Espanol Hispanoamericano. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stockwell, R.P. 1972. The role of intonation: reconsiderations and other considerations. In Bolinger (ed.), 87–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strangert, E. 1990. Pauses, syntax and prosody. Nordic Prosody V, 294–305. Turku University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streefkerk, B.M. and L.C.W. Pols. 1996. Prominent accents and pitch movements. Proc. Institute of Phonetic Sciences, 111–120. University of Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeter, L. 1978. Acoustic determinants of phrase boundary perception. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 71, 1582–1592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svetozarova, N.D. 1998. Intonation in Russian. In Hirst and Di Cristo (eds.), 261–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swerts, M. 1994. Prosodic Features of Discourse Units. PhD dissertation, Eindhoven University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swerts, M. 1997. Prosodic features at discourse boundaries of different strength. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 101, 514–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terken, J.M.B. 1993. Issues in the perception of prosody. Working Papers 41, 228–233. Dept of Linguistics and Phonetics, Lund University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Touati, P. 1987. Structures Prosodiques du Suédois et du Français. Lund University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Träger, G.L. and B. Bloch. 1941. The syllable phonemes of English. Language 17, 223–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Träger, G.L. and H.L. Smith. 1951. An Outline of English Structure. Norman: Battenburg Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Truckenbrodt, H. 1995. Phonological Phrases: Their Relation to Syntax, Prominence and Focus. PhD dissertation, MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhmann, S. 1988. AkzentÖne, Grenztöne und Fokussilben: zum Aufbau eines phonologischen Intonationssystems für das Deutsche. In Altmann (ed.), 65–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uldall, U. 1960. Attitudinal meanings conveyed by intonation contours. Language and Speech 3, 223–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaissière, J. 1983a. Language-independent prosodie features. In Cutler and Ladd (eds.), 53–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaissière, J. 1983b. Une composante suprasegmentale dans un système de reconnaissance: réduction du nombre d’hypothèses lexicales et détection des frontières majeures. Recherches Acoustiques (Lannion: CNET), vol. 7, 109–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Donzel, M. and F.J. Koopmans-van-Beinum. 1997. Pitch accents, boundary tones, and information structure in spontaneous discourse in speech. 1997. Proc. ESC A Workshop on Intonation (Athens, Greece), 313–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veilleux, N.M. and M.F. Ostendorf. 1993. Probabilistic parse scoring with prosodie information. Proc. ICASSP’ 93 (Minneapolis, MN), vol. 2, 51–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verluyten, P. 1982. Recherches sur la Prosodie et la Métrique du Français. PhD dissertation, University of Antwerpen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, M.Q. and J. Hirschberg. 1992. Automatic classification of intonational phrase boundaries. Computer Speech and Language 6, 175–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, G. and J. Hirschberg. 1985. Implicating uncertainty: the pragmatics of fall-rise. Language 61, 747–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, R.S. 1945. The pitch phonemes of English. Language 21, 27–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitney, W.D. 1867. Language and the Study of Language. London: N. Trübner. (Reprinted by Georg O1ms, Hildesheim, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wightman, C.W., S. Shattuck-Hufnagel, M.F. Ostendorf and PJ. Price. 1992. Segmental durations in the vicinity of prosodie phrase boundaries. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 91, 1707–1717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wodarz, H.W. 1960. Uber vergleichende satzmelodische Untersuchungen. Phonetica 5, 75–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wode, H. 1966. Englische Satzintonation. Phonetica 15, 3–4, 129-218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wunderlich, D. 1988. Der Ton macht die Melodie: zur Phonologie der Intonation der Deutschen. In Altmann (ed.), 1–40.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Mario Rossi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Skövde, Sweden

    Antonis Botinis

  2. University of Athens, Greece

    Antonis Botinis

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rossi, M. (2000). Intonation: Past, Present, Future. In: Botinis, A. (eds) Intonation. Text, Speech and Language Technology, vol 15. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4317-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4317-2_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-6723-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4317-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation