Abstract
Concern about the quality of schooling in disadvantaged urban areas has been especially marked throughout the United Kingdom during the 1990s. This led to the instigation of a major school improvement project in Northern Ireland, known as the Raising School Standards Initiative, that was intended to help schools address significant disadvantage and under-achievement amongst their pupils. The project, based on the knowledge base of the school effectiveness tradition, was designed to target a small number of secondary schools and their main contributory primary schools. The project sought to improve the quality of school management, the pupils’ standards of literacy and numeracy, the levels of qualifications, links with local industry, parental involvement in schools, attendance and punctuality, and to deal with problems of discipline in class. The improvement strategy selected can be seen as an attempt to integrate a ‘top down’ external approach (distal) with a ‘bottom up’ (proximal) strategy developed within individual schools. This chapter describes selected aspects of the full evaluation: the launch and selection of schools and the process of ‘action planning’. It also looks at the impact of the project on management, teaching and learning and educational standards. It concludes with findings which will have implications for other initiatives which seek to raise school standards in the urban context.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Barber, M., & Dann, R. (Eds.). (1996). Raising educational standards in the inner city. Practical initiatives in action London: Cassell.
Brandsma, H.P., & Knuver, J.W.M. (1989). Effects of school classroom characteristics on pupil progress in language and arithmetic. International Journal of Educational Research, special issue Developments in School Effectiveness Research, 13(7), 777–788.
Bollen, R. (1989). School improvement: A dutch case in international perspective Leuven/Amersfoort: Acco.
Creemers, B.P.M. (1994). The effective classroom London: Cassell.
DfEE (1998). Numeracy matters: The preliminary report of the numeracy task force (published for consultation). London: DfEE.
Goldstein, H., Rasbash, J., Yang, M., Woodhouse, G., Pan, H., Nuttall, D., & Thomas, S. (1993). A multilevel analysis of school examination results. Oxford Review of Education, 19(4), 425— 433.
Gray, J. (1990). The quality of schooling: Frameworks for judgement. British Journal of Educational Studies, 38(3), 204 — 223.
Gray, J., & Wilcox, B. (Eds.). (1995). Good school bad school: Evaluating performance and encouraging improvement Buckingham: OUP.
Hallinger, P. (1996). The principal’s role in school effectiveness: an assessment of substantive findings, 1980–1995 Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Research Association, New York.
Hopkins, D., Ainscow, M., & West, M. (1994). School improvement in an era of change London: Cassell.
Joyce, B., Calhoun, E. & Hopkins, D. (1999). The new structure of school improvement. inquiring schools and achieving students Buckingham: Open University Press.
MacGilchrist, B., Mortimore, P., Savage, J., & Beresford, C. (1995). Planning matters. The impact of development planning in primary schools London: Paul Chapman.
Maden, M., & Hillman, J.(1996). Lessons in success. In National Commission on Education, Success against the odds: Effective schools in disadvantaged areas (pp. 312–363). London: Routledge.
Mortimore, P., Sammons, P., Stoll, L., Lewish, D., & Ecob, R. (1988). School matters: The junior years Somerset: Open Books (Reprinted in 1994 by Paul Chapman, London).
Mortimore, P., & Whitty, G. (1997). Can school improvement overcome the fects ofdisadvantage? University of London: Institute of Education.
Myers, K. (Ed.). (1995)., School improvement in practice: Accounts from the school made a difference project London: Falmer Press.
National Commission on Education (1996). Success against the odds: Effective schools in disadvantaged areas London: Routledge.
Office for Standards in Education (OFSTED). (1994/5). Inspection Quality London: HMSO.
Reynolds, D. (1992). School effectiveness and school improvement in the 1990s. In D. Reynolds & P. Cuttance (Eds.), School Effectiveness London: Cassell.
Reynolds, D. (1996). Turning around ineffective schools: some evidence and some speculations. In J. Gray, D. Reynolds, C. Fitz-Gibbon & D. Jesson (Eds.), Merging traditions (pp. 150–164). London: Cassell.
Robertson, P., & Sammons, P. (1997). Improving school effectiveness: A project in progress Paper presented at the Tenth International Congress for School Effectiveness and Improvement, Memphis, TN.
Rutter, M., Maughan, B., & Ouston, J. (1979). Fifteen thousand hours: Secondary schools and their effects on children London: Open Books.
Sammons, P. (1993). Measuring and resourcing educational needs: Variations in LEA’s LMS policies in inner London Clare Market Paper No. 6. London: Centre for Educational Research, LSE.
Sammons, P. (1995). Gender, ethnic and socio-economic differences in attainment and progress: a longitudinal analysis of student achievement over 9 years. British Educational Research Journal, 21(4), 465–485.
Sammons, P., Thomas, S., Mortimore, P., Owen, C., & Pennell, H. (1994). Assessing school effectiveness: Developing measures to put school performance in context London: OFSTED.
Sammons, P., Hillman, J., & Mortimore, P. (1995). Key characteristics of effective schools: Areview of school effectiveness research London: OFSTED and Institute of Education.
Sammons, P., Thomas, S., & Mortimore, P. (1997). Forging links: Effective schools and effectivedepartments London: Paul Chapman.
Sammons, P., & Smees, R. (1998). Measuring pupil progress at key stage one: Using baseline assessment to investigate value added. School Leadership and Management 18(3), 389–407.
Sammons, P., Taggart, B., & Thomas, S. (1998). Making belfast work: Raising school standards.An evaluation Report prepared for the Belfast Education and Library Board. University of London: ISEIC Institute of Education.
Showers, B. (1982). Transfer of training: The contribution of coaching Eugene, OR: Centre for Educational Policy and Management.
Slavin, R.T. (1996). Education For All Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
Smith, G. (1996). Urban education: Current position and future possibilities. In M. Barber & R. Dann (Eds.), Raising educational standards in the inner city. Practical initiatives in action London: Cassell.
Stoll, L., & Fink, D. (1996). Changing our schools: Linking school effectiveness and school improvement Buckingham: Open University Press.
Stoll, L., & Myers, K. (1997). No quick fixes perspectives on school in difficulty London: Falmer Press.
Stringfield, S., Ross, S., & Smith, L. (Eds.) (1996) Bold plans for school restructuring. The new American schools design Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Teddlie, C., & Stringfield, S. (1993). Schools made a difference: Lessons learned from a 10-year study of school effects New York: Teachers College Press.
Thomas, S., & Sammons, P. (1996). Raising school standards initiative: The development of seline and value added measures for DENL London: ISEIC Institute of Education.
Thomas, S., & Mortimore, P. (1996). Comparison of Value Added Models for Secondary School Effectiveness. Research Papers in Education, 11(1), 5–33.
Tunstall, P., & Gipps, C. (1995, september). How does your teacher help you to make your work better? Children understanding of formative assessements Paper submitted to BERA Conference. Bath, England.
Willms, J.D. (1986). Social class segregation and its relationship to pupils’ examination results in Scotland. American Sociological Review, 51, 224–241.
Yang, M., & Goldstein, H. (1996). Multilevel Models for longitudinal data. In U. Engel & J. Reinecke (Eds.), Analysis of Change, Advanced Techiniques in Panel data Analysis (pp. 191–220). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Taggart, B., Sammons, P. (1999). Evaluating the Impact of a Raising School Standards Initiative. In: Bosker, R.J., Creemers, B.P.M., Stringfield, S. (eds) Enhancing Educational Excellence, Equity and Efficiency. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4253-3_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4253-3_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5844-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4253-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive