Labeled Representations, Underspecification and Disambiguation

  • Nicolas Asher
  • Tim Fernando
Part of the Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy book series (SLAP, volume 73)


From a formal semantic perspective, interpreting natural language utterances can be broken down into two tasks:
  1. (I)

    Constructing logical forms or semantic representations of the utterances and

  2. (II)

    Manipulating well-formed semantic representations.



Discourse Relation Discourse Context Discourse Referent Label Representation Anaphora Resolution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Asher, N. (1993) Reference to Abstract Objects in Discourse. Kluwer, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asher, N. (1996) Mathematical treatments of discourse contexts. In P. Dekker and M. Stokhof, editors, Proc. Tenth Amsterdam Colloquium. ILLC, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  3. Asher, N. (fortc.) Logical foundations of discourse interpretation. In J. M. Larrazabal, editor, Logic Colloqium ′96.Google Scholar
  4. Asher, N. and A. Lascarides (1995) Lexical disambiguation in a discourse context. J. Semantics, 12, 1995.Google Scholar
  5. Asher, N. and H. Wada (1989) A computational account of syntactic, semantic and discourse principles for anaphora resolution. J. Semantics, 6, 1989.Google Scholar
  6. Barwise, J. and R. Cooper (1993) Extended Kamp notation: a graphical notation for situation theory. In P. Aczel, et al., editors, Situation Theory and Its Applications, volume 3. CSLI, Stanford.Google Scholar
  7. Bos, J. (1996) Predicate logic unplugged. In P. Dekker and M. Stokhof, editors, Proc. Tenth Amsterdam Colloquium. ILLC, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  8. Fernando, T. (1997) Ambiguity under changing contexts. Linguistics and Philosophy, 20, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gabbay, D. and R. Kempson (1996) Language and Proof Theory. J. Logic, Language and Information, 5, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Groenendijk, J. and M. Stokhof (1991) Dynamic predicate logic. Linguistics and Philosophy, 14, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Groenendijk, J., M. Stokhof, and F. Veltman (1996) This might be it. In J. Seligman and D. Westerståhl, editors, Logic, Language and Computation, volume 1. CSLI Lecture Notes Number 58, Stanford.Google Scholar
  12. Grosz, B., A. Joshi, and S. Weinstein (1995) Centering: a framework for modeling the local coherence of discourse. Computational Linguistics, 21(2), 1995.Google Scholar
  13. Grosz, B. and C. Sidner (1986) Attention, intentions, and the structure of discourse. Computational Linguistics, 12(3), 1986.Google Scholar
  14. Hardt, D. (1996) Centering in dynamic semantics. In Proceedings COLING-96.Google Scholar
  15. Hobbs, J.R. (1985) On the coherence and structure of discourse. Technical Report 85–37, Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford.Google Scholar
  16. Kamp, H. and U. Reyle (1993) From Discourse to Logic. Kluwer, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lascarides, A. and N. Asher (1993) Temporal interpretation, discourse relations and commonsense entailment. Linguistics and Philosophy, 16(5), 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Polanyi, L. (1985) A theory of discourse structure and discourse coherence. In P.D. Kroeberger et al., editors, General Session, 21st Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
  19. Reyle, U. (1993) Dealing with ambiguities by underspecification: construction, representation and deduction. J. Semantics, 10(2), 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sandt, R.A. van der (1992) Presupposition projection as anaphora resolution. J. Semantics, 9(4), 1992.Google Scholar
  21. Sperber, D. and D. Wilson (1986) Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  22. Thompson, S. and W. Mann (1987) Rhetorical structure theory: a framework for the analysis of texts. In IPRA Papers in Pragmatics, volume 1. 1987.Google Scholar
  23. Wilson, D. Truth, coherence, relevance: recent approaches to pragmatics. Invited talk, ITALLC 96, London, July 1996.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicolas Asher
  • Tim Fernando

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations