Advertisement

A Disambiguation Approach for German Compounds with Deverbal Head

  • Sabine Reinhard
Chapter
  • 150 Downloads
Part of the Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy book series (SLAP, volume 73)

Abstract

Word formation, in particular compounding, is an extremely productive process in German as well as in many other languages. As a result, vast numbers of lexical entries have to be encoded by hand. This is true not only for monolingual lexica, but also in the context of machine translation, where for each compound a separate transfer rule has to be written. Also, if the application domain is not extremely restricted, natural language processing (NLP) systems will encounter unknown words, which is particularly true for systems with free spoken language input, such as Verbmobil.

Keywords

Machine Translation Direct Object Argument Structure Thematic Role Theme Argument 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bierwisch, M. (1989) Event Nominalizations: Proposals and Problems. Linguistische Studien, Reihe A 194, 1–73.Google Scholar
  2. Downing, P. (1977) On the Creation and Use of English Compound Nouns. In: Language 53(4), 810–84.Google Scholar
  3. Dowty, D. (1979) Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dowty, D. (1991) Thematic Proto-Roles and Argument Selection. In: Language 67, 547–619.Google Scholar
  5. Finin, T. W. (1980) The Semantic Interpretation of Nominal Compounds. In: Proceedings of the First Conference on AI, 1980.Google Scholar
  6. Grimshaw, J. (1990) Argument Structure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  7. Jackendoff, R. (1990) Semantic Structures. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  8. Levin, B. & M. Rappaport (1988) What to Do with θ-Roles. In: Wilkins, W. (ed.): Syntax and Semantics 21: Thematic Relations. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  9. Lieber, R. (1983) Argument Linking and Compounds in English. In: Linguistic Inquiry 14 (2), p. 251–285.Google Scholar
  10. Rapp, I. & S. Reinhard (1997) ung-Nominalisierungen: Interpretation, Bil-dungsrestriktionen und Argumentvererbung—Desambiguierung deverbaler Komposita. Verbmobil-Report 192, Universität Tübingen.Google Scholar
  11. Reinhard, S. (to appear) Deverbale Komposita an der Morphologie-Semantik-Schnittsteile: ein HPSG-Ansatz. Doctoral dissertation, Universität Tübingen.Google Scholar
  12. Selkirk, E.O. (1982) The Syntax of Words. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sabine Reinhard

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations