Advertisement

Linking Theory and Lexical Ambiguity: The Case of Italian Motion Verbs

  • Luca Dini
  • Vittorio Di Tomaso
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy book series (SLAP, volume 73)

Abstract

This chapter takes into account the interactions between motion verbs and spatial prepositions in Romance languages, considering Italian as a case study. We will show that, contrary to traditional approaches (Zin-garelli, 1995; Serianni, 1988), there is no need to assume that spatial prepositions in Italian are almost systematically ambiguous between a static and a dynamic interpretation. Such an assumption, which is made in analogy with Germanic languages, hides the generalization that monosyllabic static and dynamic Italian locative prepositions axe not distinct.

Keywords

Semantic Representation Lexical Entry Semantic Structure Lexical Ambiguity Path Location 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Asher, N. and Sablayrolles P. (1995) A typology and discourse semantics for motion verbs and spatial PPs in French. Journal of Semantics 12, 163–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boons, J. (1987) La notion sémantique de déplacement dans une classification syntaxique des verbes locatifs. Langue Française 76, 5–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burzio, L. (1987) Italian Syntax. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
  4. Carpenter, B. (1992) The Logic of Typed Feature Structures. Cambridge Tracts in Theoretical Computer Science 32. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chomsky, N. (1981) Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
  6. Davis, A. (1995). Linking Theory and the Hierarchical Lexicon. Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University.Google Scholar
  7. Dini, L. (1995) Unaccusative Behaviors. Quaderni del Laboratorio di Linguistica 7, 92–122. Scuola Normale Superiore. Also appeared in Surface based Syntax of Romance Languages, Reader of the 1996 European Summer School in Logic, Language and Information.Google Scholar
  8. Dini, L. (1998) Events and their Measures. Ph.D. thesis, Scuola Normale Superiore.Google Scholar
  9. Dini, L. and Bertinetto P.M. (1995) Punctual verbs and the linguistic ontology of events. Quaderni del Laboratorio di Linguistica 7, 123–160. Scuola Normale Superiore.Google Scholar
  10. Dini, L. and Busa F. (1994) Generative operations in a constraint-based grammar. In H. Trost (1994) KONVENS ′94, Verarbeitung Natürlicher Sprache. Informatik Xpress 6, Germany.Google Scholar
  11. Dini, L. and Di Tomaso V. (1995) Events and individual in Italian dynamic locative expressions. In Proceedings the 4th Conference on the Cognitive Science of Natural Language Processing.Google Scholar
  12. Dini, L., Mazzini G., Battista M., Pirrelli V. and Ruimy N. (1995) The italian core grammar. LRE Report 61029, Delivery E-D5-IT, CEC, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
  13. Di Tomaso, V. (in preparation) On the Interaction between Motion Verbs and Spatial Prepositions. Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa.Google Scholar
  14. Di Tomaso, V. and Dini, L. (in preparation) Yet another explanation of the Unaccusative Hypothesis in Italian. Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa.Google Scholar
  15. Dowty, D. (1979) Word Meaning and Montague Grammar: the Semantics of Verbs and Times in Generative Semantics and in Montague’s PTQ. Dordrecht: ReidelGoogle Scholar
  16. Grimshaw, J. (1990) Argument Structure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  17. Herskovits, A. (1986) Language and Spatial Cognition. Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Higginbotham, J. (1995) Sense and Syntax. Oxford: Clarendon Press; New York: Oxford University Press; Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Hobbs, J., Croft W., Davies T., Edwards D. and Kenneth Laws K. (1987) Commonsense metaphisics and lexical semantics. Computational Linguistics 13, 241–250.Google Scholar
  20. Jackendoff, R. (1983) Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  21. Jackendoff, R. (1990) Semantic structures. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  22. Jackendoff, R. (1996) The Proper treatment of measuring out, telicity, and perhaps even quantification in English. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 14(2),305–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kalita, J. and Lee, J. (1996) An informal semantic analysis of motion verbs based on physical primitives. Accepted for pubblication in Computational Intelligence.Google Scholar
  24. Krieger, H.-U. and Schäfer U. (1994a) TDL—a type description language for constraint-based grammars. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, COLING-94, Kyoto, Japan.Google Scholar
  25. Krieger, H.-U. and Schäfer U. (1994b) TDL—a type description language for HPSG. part 1: Overview. Research Report RR-94-37, DFKI, Saarbrücken, Germany.Google Scholar
  26. Krifka, M. (1992) Thematic relations as links between nominal reference and temporal constitution. In I. Sag and A. Szabolcsi (1992) Lexical Matters. Stanford: CSLI Lecture Notes 24, 29–53.Google Scholar
  27. Lang, E. (1993) A two levels approach to projective prepositions. In C. Wibbelt (1993) The Semantics of Prepositions: from Mental Models to Natural Language Processing. Berlin: Mouton de Guyter.Google Scholar
  28. Laur, D. (1991) Semantique du déplacement et de la localization en francais. Ph.D. thesis, Université Toulouse le Mirail.Google Scholar
  29. Levin, B. and Rappaport Hovav M. (1995) Unaccusativity. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  30. Me Kevitt, P. (1995) Artificial Intelligence Review, 8, Special Volume on the Integration of Language and Vision Processing.Google Scholar
  31. Marconi, D. (1997) Lexical Competence. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  32. Moens, M. and Steedmann M. (1988) Temporal ontology and temporal reference. Computational Linguistics 14(2), 15–28.Google Scholar
  33. Neumann, G. (1993) Design principles of the DISCO system. In Proceedings of TWLT 5, Twente, Netherlands.Google Scholar
  34. Olivier, P. and Gapp, K. (in press) Representation and Processing of Spatial Expression. Mahwah, New Jersey: Laurence Erlbaun.Google Scholar
  35. Pollard, C. and Sag, I. (1994) Head Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Chicago and Stanford: University of Chicago Press and CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
  36. Pustejovsky, J. (1995) The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  37. Pustejovsky, J. and Busa, F. (1995) Unaccusativity and Event Composition. In V. Bianchi, P. M. Bertinetto, J. Higgimbotham and M. Squartini, editors, Temporal Reference, Aspect and Actionality: Syntactic and Semantic Perspectives. Torino: Rosemberg & Sellier.Google Scholar
  38. Sablayrolles, P. (1993) A two-level semantics for French expressions of motion. Technical report, DFKI Research Report.Google Scholar
  39. Serianni, L. (1988) Grammatica Italiana. Torino: UTET.Google Scholar
  40. Talmy, L. (1983) How language structures space. In H. Pich and L. Acreolo (1983) Spatial Orientation: Theory, Reasearch and Application. Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  41. Talmy, L. (1985) Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structures in lexical form. In Shopen T. et al. (1985) Language typology and syntactic description, vol. 3. Grammatical categories and the lexicon. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Tenny, C. (1994) Aspectual Roles and the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tenny, C. (1995) How motion verbs are special. Pragmatics and Cognition 3, 31–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Vendler, Z. (1957) Verbs and Times. In Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Verkuyl, H. (1993) A Theory of Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zingarelli, N. (1995) Vocabolario della lingua italiana. Bologna: Zanichelli.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luca Dini
  • Vittorio Di Tomaso

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations