Dynamic Discourse Referents for Tense and Modals

  • Matthew Stone
  • Daniel Hardt
Part of the Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy book series (SLAP, volume 73)


Time Marker Discourse Referent Modal Interpretation Discourse Marker Parallel Element 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Dalrymple, M., Shieber, S., and Pereira, F. (1991) Ellipsis and higher-order unification. Linguistics and Philosophy, 14(4).Google Scholar
  2. Dekker, P. (1993) Transsentential Meditations. PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  3. Enç, M. (1986) Towards a referential analysis of temporal expressions. Linguistics and Philosophy, 9(3):405–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fiengo, R. and May, R. (1994) Indices and Identity. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  5. Frank, A. and Kamp, H. (1997) On context dependence in modal constructions. In SALT-97, Stanford, CA. Stanford.Google Scholar
  6. Geurts, B. (1995) Presupposing. PhD thesis, University of Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  7. Groenendijk, J. and Stokhof, M. (1990) Dynamic Montague grammar. In Kálmán, L. and Pólos, L., editors, Papers from the Second Symposium on Logic and Language, pages 3–48, Budapest. Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
  8. Grosz, B. J., Joshi, A. K., and Weinstein, S. (1995) Centering: A framework for modeling the local coherence of discourse. Computational Linguistics, 21(2):203–225.Google Scholar
  9. Hardt, D. (1993) VP Ellipsis: Form, Meaning, and Processing. PhD thesis, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  10. Hardt, D. (1999) Dynamic interpretation of verb phrase ellipsis. Linguistics and Philosophy 22(2): 187–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hinrichs, E. (1986) Temporal anaphora in discourses of English. Linguistics and Philosophy, 9(l):63–82.Google Scholar
  12. Kibble, R. (1994) Dynamics of epistemic modality and anaphora. In Bunt, H., Muskens, R., and Rentier, G., editors, International Workshop on Computational Semantics, Tilburg, NL. ITK.Google Scholar
  13. Kibble, R. (1995) Modal subordination, focus and complement anaphora. In Proceedings of the Tbilisi Symposium on Language, Logic and Computation.Google Scholar
  14. Kratzer, A. (1989) An investigation of the lumps of thought. Linguistics and Philosophy, 12:607–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lascarides, A. and Asher, N. (1991) Discourse relations an defeasible knowledge. In Proceedings of ACL 29, pages 55–62.Google Scholar
  16. Lewis, D. K. (1973) Counterfactuals. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  17. Muskens, R. (1995) Tense and the logic of change. In Lexical Knowledge in the Organization of Language, volume 114 of Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, pages 147–184. John Benjamins, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  18. Muskens, R. (1996) Combining Montague semantics and discourse representation. Linguistics and Philosophy, 19(2): 143–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Partee, B. H. (1973) Some structural analogies between tenses and pronouns in English. Journal of Philosophy, 70:601–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Partee, B. H. (1984) Nominal and temporal anaphora. Linguistics and Philosophy, 7(3):243–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Portner, P. (1994) Modal discourse referents and the semantics-pragmatics boundary. Manuscript.Google Scholar
  22. Reichenbach, H. (1947) Elements of Symbolic Logic. Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
  23. Reinhart, T. (1995) Interface strategies. Manuscript, Utrecht.Google Scholar
  24. Roberts, C. (1986) Modal Subordination, Anaphora and Distributivity. PhD thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
  25. Roberts, C. (1989) Modal subordination and pronominal anaphora in discourse. Linguistics and Philosophy, 12(6):683–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Saeboe, K. J. (1996) Anaphoric presuppositions and zero anaphora. Linguistics and Philosophy, 19(2):187–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Stone, M. (1997) The anaphoric parallel between modality and tense. Technical Report IRCS 97–6 and CIS 97–9, University of Pennsylvania. Submitted.Google Scholar
  28. van der Sandt, R. (1992) Presupposition projection as anaphora resolution. Journal of Semantics, 9(2):333–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Webber, B. L. (1988) Tense as discourse anaphor. Computational Linguistics, 14(2):61–73.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matthew Stone
  • Daniel Hardt

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations