Abstract
A central issue since the late 1960’s has been the issue of whether ellipsis resolution processes are syntactic or semantic in nature.1 Recently, works that take a more generalized discourse view (Prüst et al, 1993; Asher, 1993; Kehler, 1994) have suggested the need for an approach which eschews a purely syntactic or semantic approach, but rather is conditioned by discourse structure. Kehler, for instance, has modified the approach of Hankamer and Sag (1976, 1984) so that whether the resolution arises from syntactic copying or is semantic i.e. dermis from material already integrated in the discourse model, is determined by whether the coherence relation between clauses is parallel or not;. Thus, on the Sag/Hankamer/Kehler view, syntactic parallelism is not expected indeed not possible in resolution where the source has been integrated in the discourse model. In this chapter, I show that short answers as they occur in extended dialogue involve a resolution process that is perplexing for current models of ellipsis, both purely syntactic or semantic, and mixed ones such as Kehler’s. In particular, I demonstrate that elliptical options are possible
-
at essentially unbounded distance from the original source,
-
long after integration of material must have taken place in the discourse model, and yet,
-
(partial) syntactic parallelism obtains.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Asher, N. (1993), Reference to Abstract Objects in English: a Philosophical Semantics for Natural Language Metaphysics. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Baddeley, A. (1997) Human Memory: Theory and Practice. Hove: Psychology Press.
Barwise, J. and R. Cooper (1991) Simple Situation Theory and its graphical representation. In: J. Seligman (ed.) DYANA Report R2.1.C.
Black, A. (1992) Computational Situation Theory. PhD Dissertation, University of Edinburgh.
Cohen, G. (1997) Memory in the Real World. Hove: Psychology Press.
Cremers, C. (1983) One the form and interpretation of Ellipsis. In: A. ter Meulen (ed.) Studies in Modeltheoretic Semantics. Dordrecht: Foris.
Cooper, R. (1991) Three lectures on Situation Theoretic Grammar. In: M. Filgueiras et al. (eds.) Natural Language Processing: Proceedings of EAIA 90, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence no. 476, Berlin: Springer Verlag, 101–140.
Cooper, R. (1993) Integrating different information sources in linguistic interpretation. In: Y.H. Lee (ed.) Proceedings of Chosun University Linguistic Seminar.
Corblin, F. (1994) Multiple Negation Processing. University of Edinburgh HCRC Research Paper, RP-62.
Gawron, M. and Peters, S. (1990) Anaphora and Quantification in Situation Semantics. CSLI publications, Stanford: CSLI.
Ginzburg, J. (1994) An Update Semantics for Dialogue. In: H. Bunt, R. Muskens, G. Rentier (eds.) Proceedings of the International Workshop on Computational Semantics. Tilburg: ITK.
Ginzburg J. (1995a) Resolving Questions, I. Linguistics and Philosophy 18, 5:359–423.
Ginzburg, J. (1995b) Interrogatives: questions, facts and dialogue. In: S. Lappin (ed.) Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
Ginzburg, J. (forthcoming) Moving on the Dialogue Gameboard: a Semantics for interaction in Dialogue. Stanford: CSLI.
Hankamer, J and I. Sag (1976) Deep and Surface Anaphora. Linguistic Inquiry, 7, 391–426.
Hausser, R. and D. Zaefferer (1979) Questions and Answers in a Context Dependent Montague Grammar. In: Guenthner J. and Schmidt J. (eds.) Formal Semantics and Pragmatics for Natural Languages. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Hull R. (1975) A semantics for superficial and embedded questions in natural language. In: E. Keenan (ed.), Formal Semantics of Natural Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kehler, A. (1994) Common topics and coherent situations: interpreting ellipsis in the context of discourse inference. ACL 32.
Lakoff, G. (1971) Presupposition and relative well-formedness. In: D. Steinberg et al (eds.) Semantics: An Interdisciplinary Reader. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Morgan, J. (1973.) Sentence fragments and the notion ‘sentence’. In: B. Kachru et al (eds.) Issues in Linguistics: papers in honour of Henry and Rene Kahane. Urbana: University of Indiana Press.
Morgan, J. (1989) Sentence Fragments Revisited. CLS 25.
Pollard, C. and I. Sag (1994) Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Prüst, H, R. Scha, and M. van den Berg (1994) Discourse grammar and Verb Phrase Ellipsis. Linguistics and Philosophy 17.
Rooth, M. (1992 A Theory of Focus Interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 1, 75–116.
Sag, I. and J. Hankamer (1984) Towards a Theory of Anaphoric Processing. Linguistics and Philosophy 7.
Sher, G. (1991) The Bounds of Logic. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Steedman, M. (1990) Gapping as Constituent Coordination, Linguistics and Philosophy 13.
Vallduví, E and E. Engdahl (1996) Information Packaging in HPSG. In: C. Grover and E. Vallduví (eds.) Edinburgh Working Papers in Cognitive Science: Studies in HPSG. Centre of Cognitive Science, University of Edinburgh
Von Stechow, A. (1991) Focusing and Background Operators. In: W. Abraham (ed.) Discourse Particles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Westerståhl, D. (1993) Branching Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Language. In: P. Gärdenfors (ed.) Generalized Quantifiers, Dordrecht: Reidel.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ginzburg, J. (1999). Semantically-Based Ellipsis Resolution with Syntactic Presuppositions. In: Bunt, H., Muskens, R. (eds) Computing Meaning. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, vol 73. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4231-1_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4231-1_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-0290-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4231-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive