Skip to main content

Saint Anselm’s Proof: A Problem of Reference, Intentional Identity and Mutual Understanding

  • Chapter
Medieval Philosophy and Modern Times

Part of the book series: Synthese Library ((SYLI,volume 288))

Abstract

Saint Anselm’s proof for God’s existence in his Proslogion,as the label “ontological” retrospectively hung on it indicates, is usually treated as involving some sophisticated problem of, or a much less sophisticated tampering with, the concept of existence. In this paper I intend to approach Saint Anselm’s reasoning from a somewhat different angle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Albert of Saxony (1974), Perutilis Logica. Hildesheim-New York, Georg Olms Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous author (1967), “Tractatus de Proprietatibus Sermonum” in L.M. de Rijk (ed.) (1967), pp. 728-730.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boolos, G. (1984), “To Be Is To Be a Value of a Variable (or To Be Some Values of Some Variables),” The Journal of Philosophy 8, 430–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buridan, J. (1957), Tractatus de Suppositionibus (ed. M.E. Reina). Rivista Critica di Storia della Filosofia, 1957, pp. 175-208, pp. 323-352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buridan, J. (1977), Sophismata (ed. T.K. Scott). Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Rijk, L.M. (ed.) (1967), Logica Modernorum (I-II). Assen, Van Gorcum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H.G. (1989), Truth and Method. New York: Crossroad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, J.L. and M. Kiteley (eds.) (1991), Meaning and Truth: The Essential Readings in Modern Semantics. Paragon Issues in Philosophy, New York, Paragon House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geach, P.T. (1969), God and The Soul. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haaparanta, L. (1985), Frege’s Doctrine of Being. Acta Philosophica Fennica 39, Societas Philosophica Fennica, Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klima, G. (1983), “Szent Anzelm és az ontológiai istenérv” (“Saint Anselm and The Ontological Argument“, Vilägossäg 24, supplement, 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klima, G. (1988), ArsArtium: Essays in Philosophical Semantics, Medieval and Modern. Doxa Library 1, Budapest, Institute of Philosophy of the Hungarian Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klima, G. (1984), “Libellus pro Sapiente: A Criticism of Allan Bäck’s Argument Against Saint Thomas Aquinas’ Doctrine of the Incarnation”, The New Scholasticism 58, 298–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klima, G. (1993), “The Changing Role of Entia Rationis in Medieval Philosophy: A Comparative Analysis with a Reconstruction,” Synthese 96, 25–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kneale, W. (1949), “Is Existence A Predicate?” in H. Peigl and W. Sellars, Readings in Philosophical Analysis. New York, Appleton-Century-Crofts, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knuuttila, S. and J. Hintikka (eds.) (1986), The Logic of Being. Dordrecht, Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, S. (1991), “Speaker’s Reference and Semantic Reference” in J.L. Garfield and M. Kiteley (eds.) (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert of Auxerre (1988), “Properties of Terms” (ch. VIII of his Logica, ed. Franco Alessio, Florence, La Nuova Italia, 1971), translated in N. Kretzmann and E. Stump (eds.), The Cambridge Translations of Medieval Philosophical Texts. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lycan, W. (1991), “The Trouble with Possible Worlds” in J. Garfield and M. Kiteley (eds.), Meaning and Truth: The Essential Readings in Modern Semantics. Paragon Issues in Philosophy, New York, Paragon House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. (1980), Nonexistent Objects. New Haven, Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W.V.O. (1971), “On What There Is” in From a Logical Point of View. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, P. (1990), Naming, Necessity and Natural Kinds. Ithaca, Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • St. Anselm of Canterbury (1968), Sancti Anselmi Opera Omnia. Ed. F.S. Schmitt, Stuttgart-Bad Canstatt, F. Frommann Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • St. Bonaventure (1891), Quaestiones Disputatae de Mysterio Trinitatis in Opera Omnia, torn. V, Quaracchi.

    Google Scholar 

  • St. Thomas Aquinas (1980), Opera Omnia. Frommann-Holzboog, Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wippel, J.F. and A.B. Wolter (1969), Medieval Philosophy: from St. Augustine to Nicholas of Cusa. New York, The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Klima, G. (2000). Saint Anselm’s Proof: A Problem of Reference, Intentional Identity and Mutual Understanding. In: HolmstrÖm-Hintikka, G. (eds) Medieval Philosophy and Modern Times. Synthese Library, vol 288. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4227-4_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4227-4_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5835-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4227-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics