Abstract
It has recently been shown by Heenan and Morrison(1998a, b) that buffet due to separated flow downstream of a backward-facing step can be attenuated more or less completely by use of a permeable reattachment surface vented to an airtight plenum. With an impermeable surface, the global unsteadiness is driven by the feedback from the reattachment point of pressure and vorticity fluctuations towards the step. Their work also suggests that a permeable surface immediately downstream of separation also affects the pressure field. In this work therefore, the intention is to use a permeable surface to reduce buffet excitation of a fully separated flow, thereby reducing buffeting, the structural response. Buffeting is unlikely to be a serious problem with primary structures on aircraft. However, it produces deleterious effects on flaps with potentially serious problems caused by fatigue. The present work is not aimed at the extension of the buffet boundary, but rather seeks to make buffet onset less damaging to secondary structures. The initial objective of this project is to establish proof of concept, showing that a permeable surface can reduce the buffeting of a wing excited in the first bending mode. Initial positive results have been obtained and further, initial, results from a “segmented” model described below are also presented.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Cole, H. A. 1973 On-line failure detection and damping measurement of aerospace structures by random decrement signatures. NASA CR-2205.
Davis, D. D., Jr. and Wornom, D. E. 1958 Buffet tests of an attack-airplane model with emphasis on analysis of data from wind-tunnel tests. NACA Research Memo. L57H13.
Flynn, G. A., Morrison, J. F. and Mabey, D. G. 1999 Buffet alleviation on an unswept wing at high incidence. AIAA paper 99-0791.
Gregory, N., Quincey, V. G., O’Reilly, C. L. and Hall, D. J. 1971 Progress report on observations of three-dimensional flow patterns obtained during stall development on aerofoils, and on the problem of measuring two-dimensional characteristics. ARC CP No. 1146.
Heenan, A. F. and Morrison, J. F. 1998a Passive control of backstep flow. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 16(1/2). 122–132.
Heenan, A. F. and Morrison, J. F. 1998b Passive control of pressure fluctuations generated by separated flow. AIAA J. 36(6), 1014–1022.
Huston, W. B. 1957 A Study of the correlation between flight and wind-tunnel buffet loads. AGARD Report 111.
Meyer, R., Bechert, D. W., Hage, M. and Montag, P. 1997 BMBF-Vorhaben 13N6537-8 Aeroflexible Oberflächenklappen als “Rückstrombremsen“ nach dem Vorbild der Deckfedern des Vogelflügels. Abschlußbericht DLR IB 92517-97/B5.
Owen, T. B. 1958 Techniques of pressure-fluctuation measurements employed in the RAE low-speed wind-tunnels. AGARD Report 172.
Sharpies, N. J. 1998 The flowfield of a rectangular planform wing beyond stall. Final-year undergraduate project. Dept. Aeronautics, Imperial College.
Winkelmann, A. E. and Barlow, J. B. 1980 Flowfield model for a rectangular planform wing beyond stall. AIAA J. 18, 1006–1008.
Zan, S. J. and Maull, D. J. 1992 Buffet excitation of wings at low speeds. J. Aircraft, 29(6), 1137–1143.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this paper
Cite this paper
Flynn, G.A., Morrison, J.F. (1999). Passive Control of Buffet Excitation. In: Meier, G.E.A., Viswanath, P.R. (eds) IUTAM Symposium on Mechanics of Passive and Active Flow Control. Fluid Mechanics and its Applications, vol 53. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4199-4_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4199-4_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5826-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4199-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive