Skip to main content

Measure Theory and Integration

  • Chapter
  • 552 Accesses

Part of the book series: Mathematics and Its Applications ((MAIA,volume 510))

Abstract

Loeb measures have been applied in various fields of real analysis. In his fundamental paper [9] Peter Loeb has given the first applications to probability theory. Also developed at that time (and published later in [10]) was an application constructing representing measures in potential theory. (See Section 3.12.2.) The next convincing example of the usefulness of Loeb measures is Bob Anderson’s [2] construction of Brownian motion from a hyperfinite model of tossing an unbiased coin. Let us briefly sketch Anderson’s approach: Fix an unlimited positive integer H} and put T := { 1,...,H} This set T is infinite, but * finite, and can be interpreted as a “time line”, which is closely related to the continuous time line [0,1], because each real number between 0 and 1 is infinitely close to some \( \frac{k} {H} \) with kT. Let { -1, l}T be the set of all internal H-tuples of the numbers -1 and 1. As noted in Section 3.12, this set can be interpreted as the set of all outcomes of tossing a coin H-times. Anderson defines an internal process A : -1,1 T × T → *ℝ by setting

$$ A\left( {\omega ,t} \right): = \sum\limits_{s < t} {\omega \left( s \right)} \frac{1} {{\sqrt H }}; $$

At) can be understood as the profit (or loss) at time t during the game ω ∈ if the gamblers are playing for the infinitesimal stake of \( \frac{1} {{\sqrt H }} \) (dollar, mark, euro, lira pound sterling, it always remains an infinitestimal amount of money). for example, if ω (1) = -1 and ω (t)= 1 for each tT with t ω 1, then \( A\left( {\omega ,t} \right) = \left( {t - 2} \right)\frac{1} {{\sqrt H }} \) for each tT. Therefore At) may be unlimited.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. S. Albeverio, J. E. Fenstad, R. Høegh Krohn, T. Lindstrom, Nonstandard methods in stochastic analysis and mathematical physics, Academic Press, Orlando, 1986.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. R. M. Anderson, A nonstandard representation of Brownian motion and Itô integration, Israel J. Math. 25(1976), 15–46.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. R. B. Ash, Real Analysis and Probability, Academic Press, New York, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  4. N. Cutland, Infinitesimals in Action, J. Lond. Math. Soc. 35(1987), 202–216.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. N. Cutland, S.-A. Ng, A nonstandard approach to the Malliavin calculus, in: Advances in Analysis, Probability and Mathematical Physics — Contributions of Nonstandard Analysis, S. Albeverio, W. A. J. Luxemburg and M. P. H. Wolff (eds.), Kluwer Acad. Publ., Dordrecht, 1995, 149–170.

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. L. Hoover, E. A. Perkins, Nonstandard construction of the stochastic integral and applications to stochastic differential equations I and II, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 275(1983), 1–58.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. A. E. Hurd, P. A. Loeb, An introduction to Nonstandard Real Analysis, Academic Press, Orlando, 1985.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. H. J. Keisler, An infinitesimal approach to stochastic analysis, Memoirs Amer. Math. Soc. 48(1984).

    Google Scholar 

  9. P. A. Loeb, Conversion from nonstandard to standard measure spaces and applications in probability theory, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 211(1975), 113–122.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. —, Applications of nonstandard analysis to ideal boundaries in potential theory, Israel J. Math. 25(1976), 154–187.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. —, A functional approach to nonstandard measure theory, Contemporary Mathematics 26(1984), 251–261.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. P. A. Loeb, H. Osswald, Nonstandard integration theory in topological vector lattices, Mh. Math 124(1997), 53–82.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. W. A. J. Luxemburg, A general theory of monads, in: Application of Model Theory, Algebra, Analysis and Probability, W. A. J. Luxemburg (ed.), Hold, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1969, 18–86.

    Google Scholar 

  14. H. Osswald, Vector valued Loeb measures and the Lewis integral, Math. Scand. 68(1991), 247–268.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. K. D. Stroyan and J. M. Bayod, Foundations of Infinitesimal Stochastic Analysis, North-Holland Studies in Logic Vol 119, Amsterdam, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Y. N. Sun, A theory of hyperfinite processes, the complete removal of individual uncertainty via exact LLN, Journal of Mathematical Economics 29(1998), 419–503.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Osswald, H. (2000). Measure Theory and Integration. In: Loeb, P.A., Wolff, M. (eds) Nonstandard Analysis for the Working Mathematician. Mathematics and Its Applications, vol 510. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4168-0_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4168-0_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-6341-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4168-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics