Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Identification of rivers with high and good habitat quality: methodological approach and applications in Austria

  • Conference paper
Assessing the Ecological Integrity of Running Waters

Part of the book series: Developments in Hydrobiology ((DIHY,volume 149))

Abstract

The investigation of the 52 largest Austrian rivers with catchment areas >500 km2 (Danube River excluded) provides a national estimate of the ecological status of Austria’s rivers and an example of the current status of European alpine rivers. Emphasis is placed on evaluation criteria, such as morphological character, instream structures, longitudinal river corridor, lateral connectivity and hydrological regime compared with original conditions. This assessment and evaluation of nearly 5000 river kilometers identifies the remaining river stretches with high habitat quality as well as those stretches that have been altered by systematic channelisation or hydropower development. Altogether, about 80% (3900 km) of the stretches in Austria’s ‘larger’ rivers are moderately to heavily impacted by human activity and thus no longer correspond to their original channel form and dynamics. Impoundment, water diversion and hydropeaking each impact the hydrology of approximately 20% of the above stretches. Only about 20% of all investigated river stretches can still be classified as having high or good habitat quality and as retaining essentially natural functions. Using natural conditions as a reference, the most severe losses have occurred in reaches that were originally braided or meandering. Analysing the amount of unaltered river stretches according to biocoenotic regions, 37% (523 km) of the originally rhithral (trout) region (1416 km) and 18% (480 km) of the originally hyporhithral (grayling) region (2739 km) remain today in high or good habitat quality. Only a few intact river stretches (totaling 43 km) can be found along formerly potamal river reaches (731 km). These data underline the rarity and, therefore, national importance of the remaining unspoiled aquatic habitats. The results presented here form a basis for water resource management and nature conservation strategies, as well as for restoration programs. In particular, these investigations help to fulfill the requirements of the EU-Water Framework Directive by assisting to delineate and characterise reference sites of different river types.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abe, J., W. Davis, T. Flanigan, A. Schwarz & M. McCarthy, 1992. Environmental indicators for surface water quality programs — Pilot Study. EPA-905-R-92-001. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, Chicago, Illinois and Office of Policy, Planning and Evaluation, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, J. R. L., 1977. Changeable rivers: some aspects of their mechanics and sedimentation. In Gregory, K. J. (ed.), River Channel Changes, J. Wiley and Sons, Chichester: 15–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, H., 1992. Bewertungskriterien für Fließgewässer. Limnologie aktuell 3: 35–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benke, A. C., 1990. A perspective on America’s vanishing streams. J. n. am. Benthol. Soc. 9: 77–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binder, W. & W. Kraier, 1999. Gewässerstrukturgütekartierung Bundesrepublik Deutschland — Stand und Ausblick. Wasserwirtschaft 89: 30–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohl, E., R. Lehmann & R. Obergruber, 1992. Entwicklung von Bewertungsverfahren für Bäche auf verschiedenen Planungsebenen. Limnologie aktuell 3: 417–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boon, P. J., 2000. The development of integrated methods for assessing river conservation value. Hydrobiologia 422/423: 413–428.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boon, P. J., N. T. Holmes, P. S. Maitland, T. A. Rowell & J. Davies, 1997. A System for evaluating rivers for conservation (SER-CON): development, structure and function. In Boon, P. J. & D. J. Howell (eds), Freshwater Quality — Defining the Indefinable? The Stationery Office, Edinburgh, 299–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Böttger, K., 1986. Zur Bewertung der Fließgewässer aus der Sicht der Biologie und des Naturschutzes unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Tieflandbäche. Landschaft und Stadt 18, 2: 77–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bundi, U., A. Peter, A. Frutiger, M. Hütte, P. Liechti & U. Sieber, 2000. Scientific base and modular concept for comprehensive assessment of streams in Switzerland. Hydrobiologia 422/423: 477–487.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, T. E., 1990. Wetland losses in the U. S., 1780-1980s. Washington, D.C.: U. S. Department of the Interior. Fish and Wildlife Service, 124 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dynesius, M. & C. Nilsson, 1994. Fragmentation and Flow Regulation of the River Systems in the Northern Third of the World. Science 266: 753–762.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ellenberg, H., 1996. Vegetation Mitteleuropas mit den Alpen. Eugen Ulmer Verlag, Stuttgart: 1095 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission, 1999. Commission Proposal for a Council Directive Establishing a Framework für European Community Water Policy-6404/99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galat, D. L. & R. Lipkin, 2000. Restoring ecological integrity of great rivers: historical hydrographs aid in defining reference conditions for the Missouri River. Hydrobiologia 422/423: 29–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gepp, J., 1985. Die Auengewässer Österreichs, Bestandesanalyse einer minimierten Vielfalt. In Gepp, J. (ed.), Auengewässer als Ökozellen. Grüne Reihe des Bundesministeriums für Gesundheit und Umweltschutz (Wien) 4: 223–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haidvogl, G. & H. Waidbacher, 1997. Ehemalige Fischfauna an ausgewählten österreichischen Fließgewässern. Abt. f. Hydrobiologie, Univ. f. Bodenkultur, Wien: 85 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, R. M., S. G. Paulsen & I. Stoddard, 2000. EMAP-Surface Waters: a national, multiassemblage, probability survey of ecological integrity in the U. S.A. Hydrobiologia 422/423: 429–443.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • lilies, J., 1961. Versuch einer allgemeinen biozönotischen Gliederung der Fließgewässer. Int. rev. Ges. Hydrobiol. 46, 2: 205–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jungwirth, M., S. Muhar & S. Schmutz, 2000. Fundamentals of fish ecological integrity and their relation to the extended serial discontinuity concept. Hydrobiologia 422/423: 85–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karr, J. R., P. R. Yant, K. D. Fausch & I. J. Schlosser, 1987. Spatial and Temporal Variability of the Index of Biotic Integrity in Three Midwestern Streams. Trans. am. Fish. Soc. 116(1): 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, P. R. & E. G. Robinson, 1998. Physical habitat characterization. In Lazorchak, J. M., D. J. Klemm & D. V. Peck (eds), Field Operations and Methods for Measuring the Ecological Condition of Wadeable Streams. EPA/620/R-94/004F, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis. OR: 77-118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konoid, W., 1992. Zur Bewertung von Fließgewässern auf ökologischer Grundlage. In Friedrich, G. & J. Lacombe (eds), Ökologische Bewertung von Fließgewässern. Limnologie aktuell. Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart 3: 19–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • LAWA (Länderarbeitsgemeinschaft Wasser/Arbeitskreis ‘Gewässerbewertung Fließgewässer’). 1993. Die Gewässerstrukturgütekarte der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Verfahrensentwurf für kleine und mittelgroße Fließgewässer in der freien Landschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazowski, W., 1997. Auen in Österreich. BMUJF Wien. Monographien 81: 240 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • LFU (Landesanstalt f. Umweltschutz Baden-Württemberg), 1994. Übersichtskartierung des morphologischen Zustands der Fließgewässer in Baden-Württemberg 1992/93. Handbuch Wasser 2: 43 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • LÖLF (Landesanstalt f. Ökologie, Landschaftsentwicklung und Forstplanung NW/Landesanstalt f. Wasser und Abfall NW (LWA)), 1985. Bewertung des ökologischen Zustandes von Fließgewässern. Düsseldorf. Teil I (26 pp.) und II (65 pp.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mader, H., T. Steidl & R. Wimmer, 1996. Abflußregime österreichischer Fließgewässer. Umweltbundesamt — Monographien: 82, Wien: 192 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangelsdorf, J., K. Scheurmann & F. H. Weiß. 1990. River morphology. Springer Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg: 243 pp.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Martinet, F. & M. Dubost, 1992. Die letzten naturnahen Alpenflüsse. CIPRA. Kleine Schriften 11: 10–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moog, O., 1993. Quantification of daily peak hydropower effects on aquatic fauna and management to minimize environmental impacts. Reg. Riv. 8: 5–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moog, O., M. Jungwirth, S. Muhar & B. Schönbauer, 1993. Berücksichtigung ökologischer Gesichtspunkte bei der Wasserkraftnutzung durch Ausleitungskraftwerke. In Österr. Wasserwirtschaft 45 7/8: 201–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muhar, S. & M. Jungwirth, 1998. Habitat integrity of running waters — assessment criteria and their biological relevance. Hydrobiologia 386: 195–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muhar, S., A. Muhar, S. Schmutz, R. Wimmer, H. Wiesbauer, B. Hozang, M. Jungwirth, G. Imhof & P. Tschemernig, 1993. Ausweisung naturnaher Fließgewässerabschnitte in Österreich. Blaue Reihe des Bundesministeriums f. Umwelt, Jugend und Familie, Wien. Bd 1: 175 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, N., 1991. Der Lech. Wandel einer Wildflußlandschaft. Augsburger Ökolog. Schriften 2: 174 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naiman, R. J., J. J. Magnuson, D. M. McKnight & J. A. Stanford, 1995. The Freshwater Imperative — A Research Agenda. Island Press, Washington, D.C.: 157 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naiman, R. J., T. J. Beechie, L. E. Benda, D. R. Berg, P. A. Bisson, L. H. Mac Donald, M. D. O’Connor, P. L. Olson & E. A. Steel, 1992. Fundamental Elements of Ecologically Healthy Watersheds in the Pacific Northwest Coastal Ecoregion. In Naiman, R. J. (ed.), Watershed Management: 127–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • NRA, 1992. River Corridor Surveys. Methods and Procedures, Conservation Technical Handbook 1. Bristol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohio EPA, 1988. Ohio water quality inventory, 1988 305 (b) report, Vol. 1, and Executive Summary. In Rankin, E. T., C. O. Yoder & D. A. Mishne (eds), Ohio EPA, Division of Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment. Columbus, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parde, M., 1947. Fleuves et Rivieres, 3rd edn. Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patzner, A., W. Herbst & E. Stiiber, 1985. Methode einer ökologischen und landschaftlichen Bewertung von Fließgewässern. Natur und Landschaft 60, 11: 445–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petts, G. E., 1989. Historical analysis of fluvial hydrosystems. In Petts, G. E., H. Möller & A. L. Roux (eds), Historical Change of Large Alluvial Rivers: Western Europe. J. Wiley and Sons, Chichester: 1-18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rankin, E. D., 1995. Habitat indices in water ressource quality assessments. In Davis, W. S. & Th. P. Simon (eds), Biological Assessment and Criteria. Tools for Water Resource Planning and Decision Making. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, London, Tokyo: 181–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raven, P. J., N. T. H. Holmes, M. Naura & F. H. Dawson, 2000. Using river habitat survey for environmental assessment and catchment planning in the U.K. Hydrobiologia 422/423: 359–367.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raven, P. J., P. Fox, M. Everard, N. T. H. Holmes & F. H. Dawson, 1997. River habitat survey: a new system for classifying rivers according to their habitat quality. In Boon, P. J. & D. J. How-ell (eds), Freshwater Quality — Defining the Indefinable? The Stationery Office, Edinburgh: 215-234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, U., 1990. Beurteilung von Fließgewässerstrukturen aus ökologischer Sicht — Ergebnisse und Erfahrungen mit einer einfachen Methode. Wasserwirtschaft 80, 5: 236–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmutz, S., 1996. Anthropogene Eingriffe in Fließgewässer und deren Einfluß auf die Lebensgemeinschaften. Wasserwirtschaft 86, 5: 230–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmutz, S., M. Kaufmann, B. Vogel, M. Jungwirth & S. Muhar, 2000. A new multi-level concept for fish-based, river-type-specific assessment of ecological integrity. Hydrobiologia 422/423: 279–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiegler, A., G. Imhof, B. Pelikan & M. Katzmann, 1989. Struk turökologische Methode zur Bestandsaufnahme und Bswertung von Fließgewässern. BMLF, Wasserwirtschaftskataster, Wien: 34 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanford, J. A. & J. V. Ward, 1992. Management of aquatic resources in large catchments: recognizing Interactions Between Ecosystem Connectivity and Environmental Disturbance. In Naiman, R. J. (ed.), Watershed Management: 91-124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steidl, T., 1991. Typologie und Abflußverhalten österre:chischer Fließgewässer. Hydrologisch-hydrographische Einteilung und regionale Gliederung. Master thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences, Vienna: 166 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, J. L., J. A. Stein & H. A. Nix, 1998. Identification of wild rivers — methodology and database development. Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies, Australien National University: 77 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strahler, A. N., 1957. Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Amer. Geophys. Union Trans. 38: 913–920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thienemann, A., 1925. Die Binnengewässer Mitteleuropas. Die Binnengewässer 1. Schweizerbartsche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, J. V. & J. A. Stanford, 1995. The serial discontinuity c oncept. Extending the model to floodplain rivers. Reg. Riv.: Res. Manag. 10: 159–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werth, W., 1987. Ökomorphologische Gewässerbewertung Österreichische Wasserwirtschaft 39: 122–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelmy, H., 1990. Geomorphologie in Stichworten — Exogene Morphodynamik. Verlag Ferdinand Hirt, Rendsburg: 192 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer, R. & O. Moog, 1994. Flußordungszahlen österreichischer Fließgewässer. Umweltbundesamt — Monographien: 51 Wien: 581 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zauner, G., 1993. Fischökologische Studie untere Thaya. Studie im Auftrag der Wasserstraßendirektion: 182 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zauner, G. & S. Schmutz, 1994. Fischökologische Untersuchungen im Rahmen von Gewässerbetreuungskonzepten. In Stalzer, W. & M. Jungwirth (eds), Gewässerbetreuungskonzepte — Stand und Perspektiven. Wiener Mitteilungen 120: 323–359.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Hydrobiology, Fisheries and Aquaculture, University of Agricultural Sciences Vienna, Max-Emanuelstr. 17, A-1180, Vienna, Austria

    Susanne Muhar, Michaela Schwarz, Stefan Schmutz & Mathias Jungwirth

Authors
  1. Susanne Muhar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michaela Schwarz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Stefan Schmutz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mathias Jungwirth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

M. Jungwirth S. Muhar S. Schmutz

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this paper

Cite this paper

Muhar, S., Schwarz, M., Schmutz, S., Jungwirth, M. (2000). Identification of rivers with high and good habitat quality: methodological approach and applications in Austria. In: Jungwirth, M., Muhar, S., Schmutz, S. (eds) Assessing the Ecological Integrity of Running Waters. Developments in Hydrobiology, vol 149. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4164-2_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4164-2_28

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5814-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4164-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation