Abstract
The present study investigates the population structure and dynamics of Cottus gobio in three adjoining, hydrologically very different stream sections that are affected by water abstraction (residual flow). During the one-year investigation from October 1997 to September 1998 the selected stretches were repeatedly sampled by electrofishing. Multiple mark-recapture method was applied to determine fish density along the individual stretches and the individual marking technique (VI-tag) was used to record the migratory activity of individual fish. Stretches with intermittent flow (section A) are temporarily colonised by adult Cottus gobio from downstream sites only at higher water levels. These stretches are completely dry for about half of the year and do not enable populations to become established. Small populations persist in those transitional stretches that are intermittently isolated from other surface waters (section B). However, population size is less than one-quarter the size of those in directly adjoining downstream stretches with permanent water flow (section C). In addition, bullheads in section B have considerably poorer conditions. Changes in discharge led to increased migratory activity over the entire study area, whereby the radius of activity of the bullhead was largely (88%) restricted to distances of < 150 m. Elevated discharges mostly triggered upstream longitudinal and lateral dispersion. When the water drops to low water level and large areas in these sections dry out, the bullheads have to withdraw into deep pools. This might be the main reason for the lack of the probably less mobile juvenile stages. The results clearly demonstrate that habitat fragmentation resulting from water abstraction has drastic effects on all life stages of Cottus gobio in respect to habitat availability, spatial distribution, movement, fitness and survival. These effects can be seen at an extremely fine scale and are revealed in the significant differences in abundance and condition of Cottus gobio between the short (94 m–188 m) adjacent sections. In order to maintain and restore ecological integrity of running waters, the preservation of intact flow conditions is one of the key issues for river management.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adamicka, P., 1987. Nahrungsuntersuchungen an der Koppe (Cottus gobio L.) im Gebiet von Lunz. Österr. Fischerei 40: 8–10.
Andreasson, S., 1971. Feeding habits of a sculpin (Coitus gobio L. Pisces) population. Rep. Inst. Freshwat. Res. Drottningholm 51: 5–30.
Bagenal, T., 1978. Methods for assessment of fish production in fresh waters, 3rd edn. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, London, Edinburgh, Melbourne: 365 pp.
Baran, P., M. Delacoste, F. Dauba, J. M. Lascaux, A. Belaud & S. Lek, 1995. Effects of reduced flow on brown trout (Salmo trutta L.) populations downstream dams in French Pyrenees. Regulated Rivers: Research & Management 10: 347–361.
Barandun, J., 1990. Auswirkungen von Ausbreitungsbarrieren auf das Vorkommen von Groppen (Cottiis gobio) — Anregungen für den Artenschutz. Nat. u. Landsch. 65: 66–68.
Bless, R., 1981. Untersuchungen zum Einfluß von gewässerbaulichen Maßnahmen auf die Fischfauna in Mittelgebirgsbächen. Nat. u. Landsch. 56: 243–252.
Bless, R., 1983. Untersuchungen zur Substratpräferenz der Groppe, Cottus gobio LINNAEUS. Senckenbergiana biol. 63: 161–165.
Bless, R., 1990. Die Bedeutung von gewässerbaulichen Hindernissen im Raum-Zeit-System der Groppe (Cottus gobio L.). Nat. u. Landsch. 65: 581–585.
Bless, R., 1997. Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der Zustandserfassung und Bewertung bei Populationen von Fischarten der FFH-Richtlinie. Nat. u. Landsch. 72: 496–498.
Bretschko, G. & O. Moog, 1990. Downstream Effects of Intermittent Power Generation. Wat. Sci. Tech. 22: 127–135.
Daniels, R. A., 1987. Comparative life histories and microhabitat use in three sympatric sculpins (Cottidae: Cottus) in northeastern California. Envir. Biol. Fishes 19: 93–110.
Dynesius, M. & C. Nilsson, 1994. Fragmentation and flow regulation of river systems in the northern third of the world. Science 266: 753–762.
Fischer, S., 1998. Verteilung und Wanderverhalten der Mühlkoppe (Cottus gobio L.) in einem astatischen Bachabschnitt. Biologische Station Lunz, Universität Salzburg: 71 pp.
Gaudin, P. & L. Caillere, 1990. Microdistribution of Cottus gobio L. and fry of Salmo trutta L. in a first order stream. Pol. Arch. Hydrobiol. 37: 81–93.
Gerking, S. D., 1958. The restricted movement of fish populations. Biol. Rev. 34: 221–242.
Hofer, R. & F. Bucher, 1996. Die Koppe (Cottus gobio L.) als Indikator für Umweltbelastungen. Fischökologie 10: 47–62.
Jungwirth, M., 1998. River continuum and fish migration — going beyond the longitudinal river corridor in understanding ecological integrity. In Jungwirth, M., S. Schmutz & S. Weiss (eds), Fish Migration and Fish Bypasses. Fishing News Books, Oxford: 19–32.
Jungwirth, M., O. Moog & S. Schmutz, 1990. Auswirkungen der Veränderungen des Abflußregimes auf die Fisch-und Benthos-fauna anhand von Fallbeispielen. Abt. für Hydrobiologie und Fischereiwirtschaft, Universität für Bodenkultur, Wien.
Korolev, V. V., 1991. The common sculpin, Cottus gobio, of the Upper Pechora River Basin. J. Ichthyol. 31: 36–41.
Maile, W., T. Heilmair & T. Strobl, 1995. Relationships between hydraulic and biological parameters in residual flow reaches as a basis for stipulating residual discharge levels. International Journal on Hydropower and Dams, Barcelona: 137-147.
Marconato, A. & A. Bisazza, 1988. Mate choice, egg cannibalism and reproductive success in the river bullhead, Cottus gobio L.J. Fish Biol. 33: 905–916.
McCleave, J. D., 1964. Movement and population of the mottled sculpin (Cottus bairdi Girard) in a small Montana stream. Copeia 3: 506–513.
Mills, C. A. & R. H. K. Mann, 1983. The bullhead Cottus gobio, a versatile and successful fish. Rep. Freshwat. Biol. Ass. 51: 76–88.
Moog, O. & M. Jungwirth, 1993. Berücksichtigung ökologischer Gesichtspunkte bei der Wasserkraftnutzung durch Ausleitungskraftwerke — Kurzfassung. Österreichische Wasserwirtschaft Jg. 45, Heft 7/8.
Orsà g, L. & M. Zelinka, 1974. Zur Nahrung der Arten Cottus poecilopus Heck. und Cottus gobio L. Zool. Listy 23: 185–196.
Peter, A., 1998. Interruption of the river continuum by barrriers and the consequences for migratory fish. In M. Jungwirth, S. Schmutz & S. Weiss, Fish Migration and Fish Bypasses. Fishing News Books, Oxford: 99–112.
Roth, C. & J. Utzinger, 1993. Ökologie der Groppe (Cottus gobio L.) und deren Eignung als Indikatorfisch für den chemischen und morphologischen Zustand eines Fließgewässersystems. Diplomarbeit, Abt. für Umweltnaturwissenschaften XB, ETH Zürich (unveröffentlicht): 138 pp.
Roussel, J. M. & A. Bardonnet, 1996. Changements d’habitat de la truite (Salmo trutta) et du chabot (Cottus gobio) au cours du nyethémère. Approches multivariées a différentes échelles spatiales. Cybium 20: 43–53.
Sale, M. J. & R. G. Otto, 1991. Improving the assessment of instream flow needs for fish populations. Waterpower 91, 1: 76–84.
Seber, G. A. F., 1965. A note on the multiple-recapture census. Biometrika 52: 249–259.
Smith, R. J. F., 1985. The control of fish migration. Springer Verlag, Berlin.
Smyly, W. J. P., 1957. The life-history of the bullhead or miller’s thumb (Cottus gobio L.). Proc. zool. Soc. Lond. 128: 431–453.
Späh, H. & W. Beisenherz, 1986. Wiederbesiedlung von Forellenbächen. Erfolgreiche Versuche mit Groppen. Mitteilungen LÖLF 3: 28–34.
Stahlberg-Meinhardt, S., 1994. Verteilung, Habitatansprüche und Bewegungen von Mühlkoppe (Cottus gobio L.) und Bachforelle (Salmo trutta L.) in zwei unterschiedlich anthropogen beein-flußten Fließgewässern im Vorharz. Dissertation, Zoologisches Institut der Technischen Universität Braunschweig (unveröffentlicht): 197 pp.
Waidbacher, H. & G. Haidvogl, 1998. Fish migration and fish passage facilities in the Danube: past and present. In Jungwirth, M., S. Schmutz & S. Weiss (eds), Fish Migration and Fish Bypasses. Fishing News Books, Oxford: 85–98.
Waterstraat, A., 1992. Populationsökologische Untersuchungen an Cottus gobio L. und anderen Fischarten aus zwei Flachlandbächen Norddeutschlands. Limnologica 22: 137–149.
Welton, J. S., C. A. Mills & E. L. Rendle, 1983. Food and habitat partitioning in two small benthic fishes, Noemacheilus barbatulus L. and Coitus gobio L. Arch. Hydrobiol. 97: 434–454.
Williams, J. G., 1998. Fish passage in the Columbia River, USA and its tributaries: problems and solution. In Jungwirth, M., S. Schmutz & S. Weiss (eds), Fish Migration and Fish Bypasses. Fishing News Books, Oxford: 180–191.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this paper
Cite this paper
Fischer, S., Kummer, H. (2000). Effects of residual flow and habitat fragmentation on distribution and movement of bullhead (Cottus gobio L.) in an alpine stream. In: Jungwirth, M., Muhar, S., Schmutz, S. (eds) Assessing the Ecological Integrity of Running Waters. Developments in Hydrobiology, vol 149. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4164-2_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4164-2_25
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5814-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4164-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive