Abstract
Physical habitat integrity, while a necessary condition for ecological intcgrity, is not well defined and rarely examined in relation to the biological potential of a stream. The relations of physical habitat to the biota need to be quantified so as to better establish reference conditions and to document those physical habitat alterations that actually impact the biota. I evaluated the relation of physical habitat to benthic invertebrate communities in Missouri, U.S.A., streams — at both reference quality and habitat-altered sites. Six common within-stream habitats were delineated from each of 45 streams of reference quality in three ecoregions. Distinctive assemblages of invertebrates were associated with each habitat type. A spatial hierarchy of the influence of habitat was evident. At the largest scale, physical attributes unique to ecoregions were more influential than local conditions in structuring invertebrate communities. Within an ecoregion, however, small-scale habitat conditions were more of an influence than stream location because communities collected from the same habitat type at different streams were more similar than those collected from different habitat types at the same stream. I used this information to develop reference habitat conditions for streams of each ecoregion. I then evaluated invertebrate comrnunities from 20 streams with varying habitat conditions to model the variation and sensitivity of biological metrics in order to assess how the biota responded to habitat changes. Biological responses to habitat alterations were readily documented by taking into account both the presence or absence of particular habitats and the quality of each habitat type.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bailey, R. G., 1995. Description of the ecoregions of the United States (2nd edn). Miscellaneous publication No. 1391, Map Scale 1: 7,500,000 U. S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.
Barbour, M. T. & J. B. Stribling, 1991. Use of habitat assessment in evaluating the biological integrity of stream communities. In U. S. EPA Biological criteria: research and regulation. EPA-440/5-91-005. Washington, D.C.
Barbour, M. T., J. Gerritsen & J. S. White, 1996. Development of the Stream Condition Index (SCI) for Florida. Tetra Tech Inc., Owings Mills, MD.
Barbour, M. T., J. Gerritsen, B. D. Snyder & J. B. Stribling, 1998. Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and wadeable rivers: periphyton, benthic macroinvertebrates and fish (2nd edn). EPA/841/B/98-010 U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water, Washington, D.C.
Brussock, P. P. & A. V. Brown, 1991. Riffle-pool geomorphology disrupts longitudinal patterns of stream benthos. Hydrobiologia 220: 109–117.
Canton, L. W., 1991. Improved subsampling methods for the EPA ‘Rapid bioassessment’ benthic protocols. Bull n. am. Benthol. Soc. 8: 317–319.
Cuffney, T. F., M. E. Gurtz & M. R. Meadow, 1993. Methods for collecting benthic invertebrate samples as part of the National Water Quality Assessment Program. U. S. Geological Survey Open File Report 93-406, Raleigh, NC.
Davis, W. S., 1995. Biological assessment and criteria: building on the past. In Davis, W. S. & T. P. Simon (eds), Biological Assessment and Criteria. Lewis Publishers. Boca Raton, FL: 15–29.
Fausch, K. D., C. L. Hawkes & M. B. Parsons, 1988. Models that predict standing crop of stream fish from habitat variables. USDA, Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. WO-213: 2950–2985.
Fausch, K. D., S. Nakano & K. Ishigaki, 1994. Distribution of two congeneric charrs in streams of Hokkaido Island, Japan: considering multiple factors across scales. Oecologia 100: 1–12.
Frissell, C. A., W. J. Liss, C. E. Warren & M. D. Hurley, 1986. A hierarchical framework for stream habitat classification: viewing streams in a watershed context. Envir. Manage. 10: 199–214.
Gauch, H. G., 1982. Multivariate analysis in community ecology. Cambridge University Press.
Gorman, O. T. & J. R. Karr, 1978. Habitat structure and stream fish communities. Ecology 59: 507–515.
Hughes, R. M., T. R. Whittier, C. M. Rohm & D. P. Larsen, 1990. A regional framework for establishing recovery criteria. Envir. Manage. 14: 673–683.
lilies, J. & L. Botosaneau, 1963. Problème et méthodes de la classification et de la zonation écologique des eaux courantes considérées surtout du point de vue faunistique. Int. Ver. theor. angew. Limnol. 12: 1–57.
Jacobson, R. B., 1995. Spatial controls on patterns of land-use induced stream disturbance at the drainage-basin scale — an example from gravel-bed streams of the Ozark Plateaus, Missouri. In Costa, J. E., A. J. Miller, K. W. Potter & P. R. Wilcock (eds), AGU Geophysical Monograph 89, The Wolman Volume: 219-239.
Karr, J. R., 1991. Biological integrity: a long-neglected aspect of water resource management. Ecol. Appl. 1: 66–84.
Kolkwitz, R. & M. Marsson, 1908. Principles for the bioassessment of waterbodies according to their flora and fauna. Mitt. Der Klg. Pruf. fur Wass. Abw. Berlin-Dahlem 1: 33–72.
Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, 1987. Biological criteria for the protection of aquatic life: Volume II. Users manual for biological field assessment of Ohio surface waters. Ohio EPA, Columbus, OH.
Okland, R. H., 1996. Are ordination and constrained ordination alternative or complementary strategies in general ecological studies? J. Vegetation Sci. 7: 289–292.
Omernik, J. M., 1995. Ecoregions: a spatial framework for environmental management. In David, W. S. & T. P. Simon (eds), Biological Assessment and Criteria: Tools for Water Resource Planning and Decision Making. CRC Press, FL.
Parsons, M. & R. H. Norris, 1996. The effect of habitat-specific sampling on biological assessment of water quality using a predictive model. Freshwat. Biol. 36: 419–434.
Plafkin, J. L., M. T. Barbour, K. D. Porter, S. K. Gross & R. M. Hughes, 1989. Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for use in streams and rivers: benthic macroinvertebrates and fish. EPA/444/4-89-001, Office of Water Regulations and Standards, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
Rabeni, C. F., 1992. Habitat evaluation in a watershed context. In Stroud, R. H. (ed.), Fisheries Management and Watershed Development. Proceedings, Fisheries Management: Dealing with development in the watershed. Northeastern Division, American Fisheries Society Symposium 13, Bethesda, MD: 57-67.
Rabeni, C. F. & S. P. Sowa, 1996. Integrating biological realism into habitat restoration and conservation strategies for smal streams. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 53 (Suppl. 1): 252–259.
Rabeni, C. F., R. J. Sarver, N. Wang, G. S. Wallace, M. Weiland & J. T. Peterson, 1997. Development of regionally based biological criteria for streams of Missouri. Report to Missour Depart ment of Natural Resources from Missouri Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO.
Rankin, E. T., 1995. Habitat indices in water resource quali y assess ment. In Davis, W. S. & T. P. Simon (eds), Biological Assessment and Criteria. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL: 181-214.
Roth, N. E., J. D. Allan & D. L. Erickson, 1996. Landscape in fluences on stream biotic integrity assessed at multip e spatial scales. Landscape Ecol. 11: 141–156.
Statzner, B., J. A. Gose & V. H. Resh, 1988. Hydraulic stream ecology: observed patterns and potential applications. J. n. am Benthol. Soc. 7: 307–360.
Vannote, R. L., G. W. Minshall, K. W. Cummins, J. R. Sedell & C. E. Cushing, 1981. The river continuum concept. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 37: 130–137.
Wang, L., J. Lyons, P. Kanehl & R. Gatti, 1997. Influences of watershed land use on habitat quality and biotic integrity in Wisconsin streams. Fisheries 22(6): 6–12.
Wiley, M. J., S. L. Kohler & P. W. Seelbach, 1997. Reconciling landscape and local views of aquatic communities: lessons from Michigan trout streams. Freshwat. Biol. 37: 133–148.
Wright, J. F., D. Moss, P. D. Armitage & M. T. Furse, 1984. A preliminary classification of running-water sites in Geat Britain based on macro-invertebrate species and the prediction of community type using environmental data. Freshwat. Biol. 14: 221–256.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this paper
Cite this paper
Rabeni, C.F. (2000). Evaluating physical habitat integrity in relation to the biological potential of streams. In: Jungwirth, M., Muhar, S., Schmutz, S. (eds) Assessing the Ecological Integrity of Running Waters. Developments in Hydrobiology, vol 149. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4164-2_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4164-2_20
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5814-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4164-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive