Skip to main content

Evaluating physical habitat integrity in relation to the biological potential of streams

  • Conference paper
Assessing the Ecological Integrity of Running Waters

Part of the book series: Developments in Hydrobiology ((DIHY,volume 149))

  • 823 Accesses

Abstract

Physical habitat integrity, while a necessary condition for ecological intcgrity, is not well defined and rarely examined in relation to the biological potential of a stream. The relations of physical habitat to the biota need to be quantified so as to better establish reference conditions and to document those physical habitat alterations that actually impact the biota. I evaluated the relation of physical habitat to benthic invertebrate communities in Missouri, U.S.A., streams — at both reference quality and habitat-altered sites. Six common within-stream habitats were delineated from each of 45 streams of reference quality in three ecoregions. Distinctive assemblages of invertebrates were associated with each habitat type. A spatial hierarchy of the influence of habitat was evident. At the largest scale, physical attributes unique to ecoregions were more influential than local conditions in structuring invertebrate communities. Within an ecoregion, however, small-scale habitat conditions were more of an influence than stream location because communities collected from the same habitat type at different streams were more similar than those collected from different habitat types at the same stream. I used this information to develop reference habitat conditions for streams of each ecoregion. I then evaluated invertebrate comrnunities from 20 streams with varying habitat conditions to model the variation and sensitivity of biological metrics in order to assess how the biota responded to habitat changes. Biological responses to habitat alterations were readily documented by taking into account both the presence or absence of particular habitats and the quality of each habitat type.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bailey, R. G., 1995. Description of the ecoregions of the United States (2nd edn). Miscellaneous publication No. 1391, Map Scale 1: 7,500,000 U. S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbour, M. T. & J. B. Stribling, 1991. Use of habitat assessment in evaluating the biological integrity of stream communities. In U. S. EPA Biological criteria: research and regulation. EPA-440/5-91-005. Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbour, M. T., J. Gerritsen & J. S. White, 1996. Development of the Stream Condition Index (SCI) for Florida. Tetra Tech Inc., Owings Mills, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbour, M. T., J. Gerritsen, B. D. Snyder & J. B. Stribling, 1998. Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and wadeable rivers: periphyton, benthic macroinvertebrates and fish (2nd edn). EPA/841/B/98-010 U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brussock, P. P. & A. V. Brown, 1991. Riffle-pool geomorphology disrupts longitudinal patterns of stream benthos. Hydrobiologia 220: 109–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canton, L. W., 1991. Improved subsampling methods for the EPA ‘Rapid bioassessment’ benthic protocols. Bull n. am. Benthol. Soc. 8: 317–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuffney, T. F., M. E. Gurtz & M. R. Meadow, 1993. Methods for collecting benthic invertebrate samples as part of the National Water Quality Assessment Program. U. S. Geological Survey Open File Report 93-406, Raleigh, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, W. S., 1995. Biological assessment and criteria: building on the past. In Davis, W. S. & T. P. Simon (eds), Biological Assessment and Criteria. Lewis Publishers. Boca Raton, FL: 15–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fausch, K. D., C. L. Hawkes & M. B. Parsons, 1988. Models that predict standing crop of stream fish from habitat variables. USDA, Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. WO-213: 2950–2985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fausch, K. D., S. Nakano & K. Ishigaki, 1994. Distribution of two congeneric charrs in streams of Hokkaido Island, Japan: considering multiple factors across scales. Oecologia 100: 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frissell, C. A., W. J. Liss, C. E. Warren & M. D. Hurley, 1986. A hierarchical framework for stream habitat classification: viewing streams in a watershed context. Envir. Manage. 10: 199–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gauch, H. G., 1982. Multivariate analysis in community ecology. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorman, O. T. & J. R. Karr, 1978. Habitat structure and stream fish communities. Ecology 59: 507–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, R. M., T. R. Whittier, C. M. Rohm & D. P. Larsen, 1990. A regional framework for establishing recovery criteria. Envir. Manage. 14: 673–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • lilies, J. & L. Botosaneau, 1963. Problème et méthodes de la classification et de la zonation écologique des eaux courantes considérées surtout du point de vue faunistique. Int. Ver. theor. angew. Limnol. 12: 1–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, R. B., 1995. Spatial controls on patterns of land-use induced stream disturbance at the drainage-basin scale — an example from gravel-bed streams of the Ozark Plateaus, Missouri. In Costa, J. E., A. J. Miller, K. W. Potter & P. R. Wilcock (eds), AGU Geophysical Monograph 89, The Wolman Volume: 219-239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karr, J. R., 1991. Biological integrity: a long-neglected aspect of water resource management. Ecol. Appl. 1: 66–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolkwitz, R. & M. Marsson, 1908. Principles for the bioassessment of waterbodies according to their flora and fauna. Mitt. Der Klg. Pruf. fur Wass. Abw. Berlin-Dahlem 1: 33–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, 1987. Biological criteria for the protection of aquatic life: Volume II. Users manual for biological field assessment of Ohio surface waters. Ohio EPA, Columbus, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okland, R. H., 1996. Are ordination and constrained ordination alternative or complementary strategies in general ecological studies? J. Vegetation Sci. 7: 289–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Omernik, J. M., 1995. Ecoregions: a spatial framework for environmental management. In David, W. S. & T. P. Simon (eds), Biological Assessment and Criteria: Tools for Water Resource Planning and Decision Making. CRC Press, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, M. & R. H. Norris, 1996. The effect of habitat-specific sampling on biological assessment of water quality using a predictive model. Freshwat. Biol. 36: 419–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plafkin, J. L., M. T. Barbour, K. D. Porter, S. K. Gross & R. M. Hughes, 1989. Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for use in streams and rivers: benthic macroinvertebrates and fish. EPA/444/4-89-001, Office of Water Regulations and Standards, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabeni, C. F., 1992. Habitat evaluation in a watershed context. In Stroud, R. H. (ed.), Fisheries Management and Watershed Development. Proceedings, Fisheries Management: Dealing with development in the watershed. Northeastern Division, American Fisheries Society Symposium 13, Bethesda, MD: 57-67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabeni, C. F. & S. P. Sowa, 1996. Integrating biological realism into habitat restoration and conservation strategies for smal streams. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 53 (Suppl. 1): 252–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabeni, C. F., R. J. Sarver, N. Wang, G. S. Wallace, M. Weiland & J. T. Peterson, 1997. Development of regionally based biological criteria for streams of Missouri. Report to Missour Depart ment of Natural Resources from Missouri Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rankin, E. T., 1995. Habitat indices in water resource quali y assess ment. In Davis, W. S. & T. P. Simon (eds), Biological Assessment and Criteria. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL: 181-214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, N. E., J. D. Allan & D. L. Erickson, 1996. Landscape in fluences on stream biotic integrity assessed at multip e spatial scales. Landscape Ecol. 11: 141–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statzner, B., J. A. Gose & V. H. Resh, 1988. Hydraulic stream ecology: observed patterns and potential applications. J. n. am Benthol. Soc. 7: 307–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vannote, R. L., G. W. Minshall, K. W. Cummins, J. R. Sedell & C. E. Cushing, 1981. The river continuum concept. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 37: 130–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L., J. Lyons, P. Kanehl & R. Gatti, 1997. Influences of watershed land use on habitat quality and biotic integrity in Wisconsin streams. Fisheries 22(6): 6–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, M. J., S. L. Kohler & P. W. Seelbach, 1997. Reconciling landscape and local views of aquatic communities: lessons from Michigan trout streams. Freshwat. Biol. 37: 133–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, J. F., D. Moss, P. D. Armitage & M. T. Furse, 1984. A preliminary classification of running-water sites in Geat Britain based on macro-invertebrate species and the prediction of community type using environmental data. Freshwat. Biol. 14: 221–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

M. Jungwirth S. Muhar S. Schmutz

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this paper

Cite this paper

Rabeni, C.F. (2000). Evaluating physical habitat integrity in relation to the biological potential of streams. In: Jungwirth, M., Muhar, S., Schmutz, S. (eds) Assessing the Ecological Integrity of Running Waters. Developments in Hydrobiology, vol 149. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4164-2_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4164-2_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5814-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4164-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics