Skip to main content

Part of the book series: NATO Science Series ((ASEN2,volume 71))

  • 251 Accesses

Abstract

The uncertainty for hydraulic structures design can be divided into four basic categories: hydrologic, hydraulic, structural and social-economical. Hydraulic engineers are particularly interested in the first two categories. Traditional approach ignored the existence of hydraulic uncertainty assuming conveyance of the hydraulic structure as deterministic. Risk associated only with the natural randomness of hydrologic event was considered in terms of its return period. In order to integrate hydrologic and hydraulic uncertainties, two types of rateability models have been applied: static models and dynamic models [1]. Static models do not consider the repeated nature of hydrologic events e.g. floods. To this type belong models based on direct integration method [2,3,4,5], first-order second moments method (mean value and advanced) [6,7] and Monte Carlo simulation. Dynamic or time-dependent models can consider repeated application of loading. The objective of these models is to determine the reliability of a structure over a specified time interval (usually its service life) in which the number of occurrences of loading is a random variable. Almost all of types of models specified above were applied in the past to flood levee reliability analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Yen, B. C. and Tung, Y. K. (1993) Some recent progress in reliability analysis for hydraulic design, in B.C. Yen and Y.K. Tung. Reliability and Uncertainty Analysis in Hydraulic Design, ASCE Publisher, pp. 35–80.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lee, H. and Tung, Y. (1983) Improved risk and reliability model for hydraulic structures, Water Resources Research, 61415–1422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sowinski, M. (1994) Reliability and risk of overtopping of flood levee system, Proceedings of International UNESCO Symposium on Water Resources Planning in a Changing Word, 28–30 June, Karlsruhe, pp. II 113–122.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tung, Y. and Mays, L. (1981a) Risk models for flood levee design, Water Resources Research, 4 833–841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tung, Y. and Mays, L. (1981b) Optimal risk-based design of flood levee systems, Water resources Research, 4 843–852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Melching, C. S.(1992) An improved first-order reliability approach for assessing uncertainties in hydrologic modeling, Journal of Hydrology, 132 157–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sowinski, M. (1996) Application of AFOSM method for risk assessment of Warta River flood levee overtopping, Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on New/Emerging Concepts for Rivers - Rivertech 96, 22–26 September, Chicago, pp. 324–331.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Vrijling J. K. (1993) Development of probability design of flood defences in the Netherlands, in B.C. Yen and Y.K. Tung. Reliability and uncertainty analysis in hydraulic Design, ASCE Publisher, pp.133–178.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zhou, H.M. (1995) Towards an operational risk assessment in flood alleviation, Ph.D. Thesis, Delft University Press, Delft.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ang, A. and Tang, W. (1984) Probability Concepts in Engineering Planning and Design, Vol.2 Decision, Risk and Reliability, Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tung, Y. (1985) Models for evaluating flow conveyance reliability of hydraulic structures, Water Resources Research, 10, 1463–1468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sowinski, M. (2000). Risk of Flood Levee Overflowing. In: Marsalek, J., Watt, W.E., Zeman, E., Sieker, F. (eds) Flood Issues in Contemporary Water Management. NATO Science Series, vol 71. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4140-6_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4140-6_37

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-6452-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4140-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics