Skip to main content

Part of the book series: NATO Science Series ((ASDT,volume 28))

  • 164 Accesses

Abstract

This discussion of the MAU process and its potential application at Sillamäe draws from the framework provided by Keeney and von Winterfeldt [3] and Dyer et. al. [11], [4] in their analysis of the problem of the disposition of nuclear power plant wastes and the weapons grade plutonium supply in the United States. Technical details associated with the outlined steps in the MAU process may be found in Keeney and Raiffa [15].

It is important to approach the issue of development of an overall plan at Sillamäe from the strategic perspective suggested in this paper. If this approach is indeed taken, the analysis (and framework for the analysis) that is an output of the process of alternative selection may be used in other waste management situations in the region. This would advance both the NATO goal of cooperation between governments and the OECD goal of cooperation between governments and industry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Merkhofer, M. W. and R. L. Keeney (1987) A Multiattribute Utility Analysis of Alternative Sites for the Disposal of Nuclear Waste, Risk Analysis 7, 173–194.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Keeney, R. L. (1987) An Analysis of the Portfolio of Sites to Characterize for Selecting a Nuclear Depository, Risk Analysis 7, 195–218.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Keeney, R. L. and D. von Winterfeldt (1994) Managing Nuclear Waste from Power Plants, Risk Analysis 14,107–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dyer, J.S., T. Edmunds, J. C. Butler and J. Jia (1997) Evaluation of Alternatives for the Disposition of Surplus Weapons-Usable Plutonium Amarillo National Resource Center for Plutonium (http://www.pu.org).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Edwards, W. and D. von Winterfeldt (1987) Public Values in Risk Debates, Risk Analysis 7, 141–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Keeney, R. L., D. von Winterfeldt and T. Eppel (1990) Eliciting Public Values for Complex Policy Decisions, Management Science 36 1011–1030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gregory, R. and R. Keeney (1994) Creating Policy Alternatives Using Stakeholder Values, Management Science 40, 1035–1048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Government of Estonia (1997) National Environmental Action Plan, http://www.envir.ee/neap/eng/.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Davis, G. (1998) The Potential for Economic Recovery of Metals From the Sillamäe Site, Turning a Problem Into a Resource: Remediation and Waste Management at the Sillamäe Site, Estonia.

    Google Scholar 

  10. National Academy of Sciences (1994) Management and Disposition of Excess Weapons, National Academy Press, Washington, D. C.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dyer, J.S., T. Edmunds, J. C. Butler and J. Jia (1996) A Proposed Methodology For the Analysis and Selection of Alternatives for the disposition of Surplus Plutonium, Amarillo National Resource Center for Plutonium.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Linkov, I., B. Morel and W. R. Schell (1997) Remedial Policies in Radiologically-Contaminated Forests: Environmental Consequences and Risk Assessment, Risk Analysis 17 67–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. OECD Centre for Co-operation with Non-Members; Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry; Industry Committee (1998) Building Capacity in the Environmental Goods and Services Industry in the Baltic Region.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Clemen, R. T. (1996) Making Hard Decisions, Wadsworth Publishing Company, Belmont, California, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Keeney, R. L. and H. Raiffa (1976) Decisions With Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Butler, J., J. Jia and J. Dyer (1997) Simulation Techniques for the Sensitivity Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision Models, European Journal of Operational Research 103 531–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Anselmo, P.C. (2000). Outline of a Multiattribute Utility Approach to Development of a Waste Management Strategy at Sillamäe. In: Rofer, C.K., Kaasik, T. (eds) Turning a Problem into a Resource: Remediation and Waste Management at the Sillamäe Site, Estonia. NATO Science Series, vol 28. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4092-8_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4092-8_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-6187-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4092-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics