Abstract
Feminist philosophy may be said to be a way of thinking which insists that the female experiences, identities, and ways of being and thinking be considered at least equal in value to those of the male. It is rooted in a belief that women have been dominated and disadvantaged by a way of being and thinking that is culturally patriarchal in character. Although evidences of these concerns may be found throughout much of the western tradition, it is the nineteenth century that gave birth to many philosophical arguments aimed at the emancipation of women and women’s suffrage. Feminist philosophy, as we know it today, is often associated with the movement that began in the 1960s, building in some cases upon the work done by Simone de Beauvoir in The Second Sex, published in 1949. It challenges many of the traditional philosophical dualisms of mind and body, reason and desire, and subject and object. Some feminist philosophers challenge scientific claims to objectivity and universality in knowledge arguing that empirical methods suffer from the biases of gender/sex, race and class, and that because of this they are not objective enough. Others challenge the understanding of ethics in terms of justice and rights in favor of a view which emphasizes caring relationships and responsibilities that follow from that. Some feminist thinking is more reformist in nature, other more revolutionary in nature. And some feminists argue for a universal feminist standpoint while others insist that such reflects patriarchal thinking, that women are many, not one.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Mary Daly, Beyond God the Father: Toward a Philosophy of Women’s Liberation (Boston: Beacon Press, 1973), p. 4.
Ibid., p. 19.
Ibid., p. 21
Ibid., p. 29.
Ibid., p. 5.
Ibid., p. 36.
Ibid., p. 43.
Mary Daly, Gyn/Ecology: The Metaethics of Radical Feminism (Boston: Beacon Press, 1978), p. 111.
Sally McFague, Metaphorical Theology: Models of God in Religious Language (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1982), p. viii.
Ibid., p. 15.
Ibid., p. 23.
Ibid., p. 153.
Ibid., p. 166.
Sally McFague, The Body of God (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1993), p. 145.
Luce Irigaray, Speculum of the Other Woman (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1985), p. 133.
Luce Irigaray, This Sex Which is not One (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1985), p. 69.
Ibid., p. 74.
Ibid., p. 213.
Luce Irigaray, Sex and Genealogies (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993), p. 17.
Luce Irigaray, Speculum, pp. 199–200.
Ross Mitchell Guberman, ed., Julia Kristeva Interviews (New York: Columbia University Press, 1996), p. 7.
Julia Kristeva, The Kristeva Reader, ed. Kelly Oliver (New York: Columbia University Press, 1997), p. 27.
Ibid., p. 35.
Ibid., p. 35.
Julia Kristeva Interviews, p. 116.
The Kristeva Reader, p. 372.
Ibid., p. 373.
Ibid., p. 207.
Julia Kristeva, Tales of Love (New York: Columbia University Press, 1987), p. 147.
Ibid., p. 30.
Ibid., p. 6.
Pamela Sue Anderson, A Feminist Philosophy of Religion (Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1998), p. 70.
Ibid., p. 76.
Ibid., p. 153.
Ibid., p. 214.
Ibid., p. 128.
Ibid., p. 229.
Grace M. Jantzen, Becoming Divine: Towards A Feminist Philosophy of Religion (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1999), p. 130.
Ibid., p. 194.
Ibid., p. 254.
Ibid., p. 272.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Long, E.T. (2000). Feminist Philosophy. In: Twentieth-Century Western Philosophy of Religion 1900–2000. Handbook of Contemporary Philosophy of Religion, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4064-5_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4064-5_23
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-1454-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4064-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive