Abstract
We would like to propose for general discussion some topics which seem to belong to the perennial subjects of the philosophy of art and concerning the very idea of creativity. There is, we think, a strong relationship between human creativity (the human approach to the world) and its most significant “product”, or end result, namely, the work of art. In at least one of its aspects, human “inventiveness”, to use Croce’s term,1 is (clearly) visible, i.e., the sphere of aesthetics. In our opinion it is the phenomenological and existentialist orientation that sheds penetrating light on the problems of art in very close connection with a series of intentional activities of free and spontaneous human beings. It stands to reason that in the aesthetic theories2 (reconstructed and collated) of first Husserl and then Heidegger, Jaspers, Sartre, Merleau-Ponty and Natanson — who are grouped here into one, unanimous, so to speak, body of art theory — one can easily discern a conspicuous call for a return to the proper area (universe of discourse) of art investigating, the philosophy of art. What we refer to here is a sometimes dramatic if not futile attempt to overcome the paralysing disarray visible in aesthetics as well as in the “praxis” of art since “the great narrations abruptly ceased operating”.3 One of the reasons for this poor state of affairs is (as Jaspers remarked on one occasion) the gradual and constant process of the de-philosophizing of art theory which means or still better meant a total absence of broader and deeper reflection, a complete loss of the philosophical stance. According to both phenomenological and existential philosophers — who devoted much of their attention to these issues and produced many a brilliant page in their oeuvres - it is the rich but evasive phenomenon of art which should become the fundamental domain of all aesthetic analyses and inquiries. Neither traditional thinkers nor aestheticians, still less historians of ideas, could deny that only philosophically oriented aesthetics is capable of playing a crucial part in overcoming “this poor state of affairs”. It may or might lead, more precisely, to a re-introduction, so to speak, of philosophy as the only valuable guide for aesthetic inquiries or descriptions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
See Benedetto Croce, Aesthetics (London: 1972).
See Guido Morpurgo-Tagliabue, L’Esthétique Contemporaine (Milan: 1960).
We here use Francois Lyotard’s term. See La Condition Postmoderne (Paris: 1979).
See Mary Warnock, Existentialism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1978).
We here use Camus’ term.
See Jean-Paul Sartre, L’Être et la Néant (Paris: 1974).
See Piotr Mróz, Four Essays in Existentialism (in Polish), (Krakow: 1997).
See Karl Jaspers, Way to Wisdom (New York: 1980).
See Martin Heidegger, Mróz, Four Essays, op. cit.
See Piotr Mróz, Filozofia Sztuki — w ujęciu egzystencjalizmu (Kraków: 1993) (“Philosophy of Art — in Existentalism”).
See Jean-Paul Sartre, La Nausée (Paris: 1970).
See Jean-Paul Sartre, L’Imagination (Paris: 1981).
Ibidem.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mróz, P. (2000). The Human Arts and the Natural Laws of Bios Return to Consciousness . In: Tymieniecka, AT. (eds) The Origins of Life. Analecta Husserliana, vol 67. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4058-4_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4058-4_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5786-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4058-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive