Skip to main content

The Epistemology of Cosmology

  • Chapter
The Universe

Part of the book series: Astrophysics and Space Science Library ((ASSL,volume 244))

  • 284 Accesses

Abstract

This article reviews epistemological issues that arise in cosmology, which is different from other subjects particularly because the universe is unique. A series of philosophical assumptions underlie our present-day spatially homogeneous and isotropic world models, whose assumed geometry is not directly testable because of limitations on what can be measured; alternative models are also viable. Nevertheless the standard model has strong support from evidence and can with full justification be adopted as a solid basis for cosmological investigation. However physical cosmology rests on, and is unable to investigate in terms of its own methods, a further series of metaphysical issues to do with the existence and nature of physical laws. Examination of these issues has of necessity to rest on appropriate philosophical and metaphysical approaches.

Fundamental issues in cosmology have always been of major concern to Jayant Narlikar. It is thus a pleasure to dedicate this reflection on the nature of epistemology in cosmology to him, on the occasion of his 60th birthday.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. A Bullock, O Stallybrass, and S Trombley (Eds). The Fontana Dictionary of Modern Thought,(Fontana, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  2. G F R Ellis. “Major Themes in the relation between Philosophy and Cosmology”. Mem Ital Ast Soc 62, 553–605 (1991).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. W R Stoeger (Ed). Theory and Observational Limits in Cosmology.(Vatican Observatory, Castel Gandolfo, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  4. G F R Ellis. “Cosmology and Verifiability”. Qu Journ Roy Ast Soc 16, 245–264 (1975).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. G F R Ellis and W R Stoeger. “Horizons in inflationary universes”. Class Qu Grav 5, 207 (1988).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. G F R Ellis and D W Sciama. “Global and non-global problems in cosmology”, in General Relativity, ed. L. O’Raifeartaigh (Oxford University Press, 1972), 35–59.

    Google Scholar 

  7. G F R Ellis and G Schreiber. “Observational and dynamic properties of small universes”. Phys Lett A115, 97–107 (1986).

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. W Rindler. “Visual horizons in world models”. Mon Not Roy Ast Soc 116, 662 (1956).

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. G F R Ellis. “Observations and cosmological models”. In Galaxies and the Young Universe, Ed. H Hippelein, K Meisenheimer and H-J Roser (Springer, 1995), 51–65.

    Google Scholar 

  10. P J E Peebles D N Schramm E L Turner and R G Kron. “The case for the Relativistic hot big bang cosmology”. Nature 352, 769–776 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. D M Meyer. “A distant space thermometer”. Nature: 371, 13 (1994).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. G F R Ellis. “Relativistic cosmology: its nature, aims and problems”. In General Relativity and Gravitation, Ed B Bertotti et al (Reidel, 1984), 215–288.

    Google Scholar 

  13. W R Stoeger, G F R Ellis, and C Hellaby. “The relationship between continuum homogeneity and statistical homogeneity in cosmology”. Mon Not Roy Ast Soc 226: 373 (1987).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. N Mustapha, C Hellaby, G F R Ellis. “Large scale inhomogeneity versus source evolution: can we distinguish them observationally?” Mon Not Roy Ast Soc 292: 817–830 (1998).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. G F R Ellis. “Limits to verification in cosmology”. Ann New York Acad Sci 336: 130–160 (1980).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. M H Partovi and B Mashhoon. “Toward verification of large-scale homogeneity in cosmology”. Astrophys Journ 276: 4 (1984).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. J Ehlers, P Geren and R K Sachs. “Isotropic solutions of the Einstein-Liouville equations”. J Math Phys 9, 1344–1349 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. W B Bonnor and G F R Ellis. “Observational homogeneity of the universe”. Mon Not Roy Ast Soc 218, 605–614 (1986).

    ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. W Stoeger, R Maartens and G F R Ellis. “Proving almost-homogeneity of the universe: an almost-Ehlers, Geren and Sachs theorem”. Astrophys Journ 443, 1–5 (1995).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. J Goodman. “Geocentrism reexamined”. Phys Rev D52 1821 (1995).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. M Kamionkowski and A Loeb. “Getting around cosmic variance”, to appear, Phys Rev D, (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  22. G F R Ellis, R Maartens, and S D Nel. “The expansion of the universe”. Mon Not Roy Ast Soc 184, 439–465 (1978).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. G F R Ellis. “Alternatives to the Big Bang”. Ann Rev Astron Astrophys 22, 157–184 (1984).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. J Wainwright and G F R Ellis (Eds). The dynamical systems approach to cosmology.(Cambridge University Press, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  25. J Wainright, G F R Ellis and M Hancock. “On the Isotropy of the Universe: Do Bianchi VIIh universes isotropize?” Class Qu Grav 15 331–350 (1998).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. A D Linde. Particle Physics and Inflationary Cosmology.(Harwood Academic, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  27. G F R Ellis. “The homogeneity of the universe”. Gen Rel Grav 11: 281–289 (1979).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. H Bondi. Cosmology (Cambridge University Press, 1960).

    Google Scholar 

  29. S W Weinberg. Gravitation and Cosmology (Wiley, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  30. G F R Ellis. “Cosmology and Verifiability”. Qu Journ Roy Ast Soc 16, 245–264 (1975).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. Particle Review Group. Reviews of Modern Physics 68: 708–722 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  32. P Coles and G F R Ellis. Is the Universe Open or Closed: The Density of Matter in the Universe (Cambridge University Press, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  33. G Boerner and S Gottlober (Eds). The Evolution of the Universe, Dahlem Workshop Report (Wiley, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  34. P Coles and G F R Ellis. “The case for an open universe”. Nature 370, 609–615 (1994).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. G F R Ellis, D H Lyth, and M B Mijic. “Inflationary Models with Ω not equal to 1”. Phys Lett B271, 52 (1991).

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. D R Matravers, G F R Ellis, and W R Stoeger. “Complementary approaches to cosmology: Relating theory and observations”. Qu J Roy Ast Soc 36, 29–45 (1995).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. J R Kristian and R K Sachs. “Observations in cosmology”. Astro-phys Journ 143: 379–399 (1966).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. G F R Ellis, S D Nel, W Stoeger, R Maartens, and A P Whitman. “Ideal Observational Cosmology”. Phys Reports 124: 315–417 (1985).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. E Hubble. The Realm of the Nebulae.(Yale University Press, 1936, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  40. G F R Ellis and W R Stoeger. “The Fitting Problem in Cosmology”. Class Qu Grav 4: 1679–1690 (1987).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  41. L Cowie and A Songaila. “Astrophysical limits on the evolution of dimensionless physical constants over cosmological time”, Astrophys Journ 453: 596 (1995).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. E R Harrison. Cosmology: The Science of the Universe.(Cambridge University Press, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  43. R Penrose. “Difficulties with inflationary cosmology”. Proc 14th Texas Symposium on Relativistic Astrophysics (Ed. E Fenves), Ann New York Academy of Science (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  44. R Penrose. The Emperor’s New Mind.(Oxford University Press, 1989), Chapter 7.

    Google Scholar 

  45. S W Hawking. Hawking on the Big Bang and Black Holes. (World Scientific, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  46. J Barrow and F J Tipler. The Anthropic Cosmological Principle. (Oxford University Press, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  47. F J Tipler. The Physics of Immortality: Modern Cosmology, Physics, and the Resurrection of the Dead. (MacMillan, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  48. P W Atkins. “The limitless power of science”. In Nature’s Imagination: The Frontiers of Scientific Vision. Ed J Cornwell (Oxford University Press, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  49. G F R Ellis. Before the Beginning.(Bowerdean Press/Marion Boyars, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  50. G F R Ellis. “Modern Cosmology and the Limits of Science”. Trans Roy Soc S Africa, 50:1–25 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. G F R Ellis. “Les Limites De L’Enterprise Cosmologique”. La Recherche (April 1998), 114–120.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ellis, G.F.R. (2000). The Epistemology of Cosmology. In: Dadhich, N., Kembhavi, A. (eds) The Universe. Astrophysics and Space Science Library, vol 244. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4050-8_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4050-8_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5784-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4050-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics