Abstract
In Chapter 5 I argued that a description of a thing is always put forward in a particular situation, i.e. with regard to particular purposes, interests, conditions of observation and a limited set of relevant description, i.e. a logical space of descriptions, which defines its meaning and relative to which its truth may be determined. Thus, an everyday description of a particular things or substance, say, the water in the jug on the kitchen table, is put forward with regard to everyday considerations and relevant implications and correct applications of descriptions of water in everyday situations (e.g. water is the kind of transparent, fluid stuff which may be used for making tea), whereas a scientific, say, a chemical description of the same substance in terms of H2O, is put forward with regard to the possibilities of observation, descriptive system and relevant procedures for determining its truth in scientific, chemical situations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Praetorius, N. (2000). The relation between language, cognition and reality II. In: Principles of Cognition, Language and Action. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4036-2_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4036-2_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-6231-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4036-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive