Skip to main content

Synthesis: The Future Success of Biological Control

  • Chapter
Biological Control: Measures of Success

Abstract

Probably the most active current debate in biological control concerns the negative effects of biological control (compare, for example, the views expressed by Hopper (1998) and Howarth (1991)). Most practitioners would, however, acknowledge the potential for biological control to go wrong and unpredicted off-target impacts to result. Howarth (Chapter 13) presents an analysis of this aspect, illustrated with a range of examples. In Australia the typical ‘dinner-party response’ to the announcement that one works in biological control is ‘No more cane toads please!’. Certainly the introduction of this agent (Bufo marinus L.) to Australia in 1935 has led to many off-target effects resulting from its highly polyphagous nature and venomous defence glands (Twyford, 1991). Its range is extending by 27 km per annum and there is no prospect of its impact being lessened. Such episodes, which are echoed by other contributors to this volume, illustrate the need for biological control to be undertaken in a more rigorous and less hit-and-miss fashion than has sometimes been the case in the past. It will be critical to understand that populations of organisms (including biological control agents) continue to adapt and evolve so pre-release testing cannot guarantee the long-term behaviour, host range and geographical range of the agent after its release (Chapter 1, Section 3.2.2).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Barbosa, P. (1998), Conservation Biological Control, Academic Press, San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, K.G., Huckett, B.I. and Botha, F.C. (1995), Ability of Pseudomonas fluoresce™, engineered for insecticidal activity against sugarcane stalk borer, to colonise the surface of sugarcane plants, Proceedings of the Annual Congress-South African Sugar Technologists’ Association, No, 69, pp. 21–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dent, D. (1995), IPM research and development, in Integrated Pest Management, Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doutt, R.L. (1964), The historical development of biological control, in Biological Control of Insect Pest and Weeds, ed P. DeBach, Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Follett, P.A. and Duan, J.J. (1999), Non-Target effects of Biological Control, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaugler R., Campbell, J.F. and McGuire, T.R. (1989), Selection for host finding in Steinernema feltiae, Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 54, 367–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelernter, W. and Schwab, G.E. (1993), Transgenic bacteria, viruses, algae and other microorganisms as Bacillus thuringiensis toxin delivery systems, in Bacillus thuringiensis, An Environmental Biopesticide: Theory and Practice, eds. P.F. Entwistle, J.S. Cory, M.J. Bailey and S. Higgs, John Wiley, New York, pp. 89–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greaves, M.P. (1996), Microbial herbicides-factors in development, in Crop Protection Agents from Nature: Natural Products and Analogues, ed. L.G. Copping, The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, pp. 444–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurr, G.M. and Wratten, S.D. (1999), ‘Integrated biological control’: a proposal for enhancing success in biological control, International Journal of Pest Management, 45, 81–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurr G. M., Wratten, S.D. and van Emden, H.F. (1998), Habitat manipulation and natural enemy efficiency: implications for the control of pests, in Conservation Biological Control, ed. P. Barbosa, Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 155–183.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Heller, J.L. (1994, reprint), Catch 22, Simon and Schuster, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hokkanen, H. and Lynch, J.M. (eds.) (1995), Biological Control Benefits and Risks, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopper, K.R. (1998), Assessing and improving the safety of introductions for biological control, in Proceedings of the Sixth Australasian Applied Entomology Research Conference, eds. M.P. Zalucki, R.A.I. Drew and G.G. White, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia, pp. 501–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howarth, R.G. (1991), Environmental impacts of classical biological control, Annual Review of Entomology, 36, 485–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoy, M.A. (1985), Recent advances in genetics and genetic improvements of the Phytoseiidae, Annual Review of Entomology, 30, 345–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoy, M.A. (1992), Criteria for release of genetically-improved phytoseiids: an examination of the risks associated with release of biological control agents, Experimental and Applied Acarology, 14, 193–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoy, M.A. (1994), Transgenic pest and beneficial arthropods for pest management programs: an assessment of their practicality and risks, in Pest Management in the Subtropics Biological Control-a Florida Perspective, eds. D. Rosen, F.D. Bennett, and J.J. Capinera, Intercept Ltd, Hampshire, UK, pp. 642–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulsman, K. (1993), Some ethical and ecological concerns arising from the application of biotechnology in agriculture, Proceedings, Tenth Australian Plant Breeding Conference, Vol. 1, Gold Coast, 18-23 April, 1993 Australian Convention and Travel Services Pty. Ltd, Canberra, Australia, pp. 280–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, D.F. and Wolffhechel, H. (1995), The use of fungi, particularly Trichoderma spp. and Gliocladium spp., to control root rot and damping-off diseases, in Biological Control Benefits and Risks, eds. H.T. Hokkanen and J.M. Lynch, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 177–189.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kistler, H.C. (1991), Genetic manipulation of plant pathogenic fungi, in Microbial Control of Weeds, ed. T.O. TeBeest, Routledge, Chapman and Hall, New York, pp. 152–170.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Landis D., Wratten, S.D. and Gurr, G.M. (2000), Habitat management for natural enemies, Annual Review of Entomology, 45, 175–201.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J. and Hoy, M.A. (1996), Adaptability and efficacy of transgenic and wild-type Metaseiulus occidentalis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) compared as part of a risk assessment, Experimental and Applied Acarology, 20, 563–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lounsbury, C.P. (1940), The pioneer period of economic entomology in South Africa, Journal of the Entomological Society of Southern Africa, 3, 9–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, G.J. and Hoy, M.A. (1997), Persistence and containment of Metaseiulus occidentalis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) in Florida: risk assessment for possible releases of transgenic strains, Florida Entomologist, 80, 42–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Migheli Q., Fiard O., Tedesco, Dl., del Musso, M.R. and Gulliino, M.L. (1996), Stability of transformed antagonistic Fusarium oxysporum strains in vitro and in soil microcosms, Molecular Ecology, 5, 641–649.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rifkin, J. (1998), The Biotech Century: Harnessing the Gene and Remaking the World, Tarcher/Putnam, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryder, M.H. and Correll, R.L. (1995), Assessing the potential benefits and risks of introducing natural and genetically manipulated bacteria for the control of soil-borne root diseases, in Biological Control Benefits and Risks, eds. H.T. Hokkanen and J.M. Lynch, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 209–216.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Salama, H.S. and Morris, O.M. (1993), The use of Bacillus thuringiensis in developing counties, in Bacillus thuringiensis, An Environmental Biopesticide: Theory and Practice, eds. P.F. Entwistle, J.S. Cory, M.J. Bailey and S. Higgs, John Wiley, New York, pp. 237–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnepf, H.E. and Whiteley, H.R. (1981), Cloning and expression of the Bacillus thuringiensis crystal protein gene in Escherichia coli, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA, 78, 2893–2897.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, L.M.D., Hirst M., Ferber, M.L., Merryweather, A.T., Cayley, P.J. and Possee, R.D. (1991), Construction of an improved baculovirus insecticide containing an insect-specific toxin gene, Nature, 352, 85–88.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, M.B. and Willis, A.J. (1998), Biocontrol-risky but necessary? Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 13, 325–329.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tomalski, M. D. Miller, L. K. (1991), Insect paralysis by baculovirus-mediated expression of a mite neurotoxin gene, Nature, 352, 82–85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Twyford, G. (1991), Australias Introduced Animals and Plants, Reed, Balgowlah, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyndale-Biscoe, C.H. and Jackson, R. (1990), Viral vectored immunosterilisation: a concept in biological control of wild animals, Proceedings of the Fertility Control in Wildlife Conference, Melbourne, Australia, 21-24 November 1990, p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Driesche, R.G. and Bellows, Jr. T.S. (1996), Biological Control, Chapman and Hall, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Weseloh, R.M. (1986), Artificial selection for host suitability and development length of the gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) parasite, Cotesia melanoscela (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), Journal of Economic Entomology, 79, 1212–1216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wintstanley, D. and Rovesti, L. (1993), Insect viruses as biocontrol agents, in Exploitation of Microorganisms, Chapman and Hall, UK, pp. 106–136.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wratten, S.D., Gurr, G.M. (2000). Synthesis: The Future Success of Biological Control. In: Gurr, G., Wratten, S. (eds) Biological Control: Measures of Success. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4014-0_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4014-0_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-1052-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4014-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics