Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Exact Utilities under Alternative Monetary Rules in a Simple Macro Model with Optimizing Agents

  • Chapter
International Finance and Financial Crises

Abstract

We construct an ortimizing-agent model of a closed economy which is simple enough that we can use it to make exact utility calculations. There is a stabilization problem because there are one-period nominal contracts for wages, or prices, or both and shocks that are unknown at the time when contracts are signed. We evaluate alternative monetary policy rules using the utility function of the representative agent. Fully optimal policy can attain the Pareto-optimal equilibrium. Fully optimal policy is contrasted with both ‘naive’ and ‘sophisticated’ simple rules that involve, respectively, complete stabilization and optimal stabilization of one variable or a combination of two variables. With wage contracts, outcomes depend crucially on whether there are also price contracts. For example, if labor supply is relatively inelastic, for productivity shocks, nominal income stabilization yields higher welfare when there are no price contracts. However, with price contracts, outcomes are independent of whether there are wage contracts, except, of course, for nominal wage outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

References

  • Bean, C. (1983). “Targeting Nominal Income: An Appraisal.” The Economic Journal 93, 806–819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canzoneri, M. B., R. E. Cumby, and B. T. Diba. (1998). “Is the Price Level Determined by the Needs of Fiscal Solvency?” Processed, Georgetown University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corsetti, G., and P. Pesenti. (1998). “Welfare and Macroeconomic Interdependence” Processed, Yale University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devereux, M. B., and C. Engel. (1998). “Fixed vs. Floating Exchange Rates: How Price Setting Affects the Optimal Choice of Exchange-Rate Regime.” NBER Working Paper 6867, National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erceg, C. J., D. W. Henderson, and A. T. Levin. (forthcoming). “Optimal Monetary Policy with Staggered Wage and Price Contracts.” Journal of Monetary Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodfriend, M., and R. King. (1997). “The New Neoclassical Synthesis and the Role of Monetary Policy.” In NBER Macroeconomics Annual 1997 (pp. 233–283). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, D. W., and J. Kim. (1999). “The Choice of a Monetary Policy Reaction Function in a Simple Optimizing Model.” In A. Leijonhufvud (ed.), Monetary Theory as a Basis for Monetary Policy . London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ireland, P. N. (1997). “A Small Structural, Quarterly Model for Monetary Policy Evaluation.” In Carnegie—Rochester Series on Public Policy (vol. 47, pp. 83–108).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. (1997). “Three Sources of Increasing Returns to Scale.” Finance and Economics Discussion Series 1997–18, Federal Reserve Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. (1998). “Specifications of Investment Adjustment Costs in a Simple Dynamic Model.” Finance and Economics Discussion Series 1998–39, Federal Reserve Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J., and S. H. Kim. (1999). “Spurious Welfare Reversals in International Business Cycle Model.” Processed, University of Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, R. G., and A. L. Wolman. (1999). “What Should the Monetary Authority Do When Prices Are Sticky?” In J. Taylor (ed.), Monetary Policy Rules . Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 349–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenig, E. F. (1996). “Targeting Nominal Income: A Closer Look.” Economics Letters 51, 89–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obstfeld, M., and K. Rogoff. (1998). “Risk and Exchange Rates.” NBER Working Paper 6694, National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotemberg, J. J., and M. Woodford. (1998). “An Optimization-Based Econometric Framework for the Evaluation of Monetary Policy.” In NBER Macroeconomics Annual 1997 (pp. 297–346). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotemberg, J. J., and M. Woodford. (1999). “Interest-Rate Rules in an Estimated Sticky Price Model.” In J. Taylor (ed.), Monetary Policy Rules . Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 57–119.

    Google Scholar 

References

  • Amano, Robert, Don Coletti, and Tiff Macklem. (1998). “Monetary Rules When Economic Behavior Changes.” Forthcoming in Reserve Bank of New Zealand Conference Volume on Monetary Policy Under Uncertainty.

    Google Scholar 

  • Backus, David, and John Driffill. (1985). “Inflation and Reputation.” American Economic Review 75(3), 530–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R.J., and D.B. Gordon. (1983a). “Positive Theory of Monetary Policy in a Natural Rate Model.” Journal of Political Economy 91, 589–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R.J., and D.B. Gordon. (1983b). “Rules, Discretion, and Reputation in a Model of Monetary Policy.” Journal of Monetary Economics 12, 101–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, O.J., and C.M. Kahn. (1980). “The Solution of Linear Difference Models Under Rational Expectations.” Econometrica 48, 1305–1311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, Olivier, and L.F Katz. (1997). “What We Know and Do Not Know About the Natural Rate of Unemployment.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 11(1), 51–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calvo, Guillermo. (1978). “On the Time Consistency of Optimal Policy in a Monetary Economy.” Econometrica 46, 1411–1428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canzoneri, Matthew. (1985). “Monetary Policy Games and the Role of Private Information.” American Economic Review 75, 1056–1428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christiano, L.J., Martin Eichenbaum, and Charles Evans. (1998). “Modeling Money.” NBER Working Paper 6371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christiano, L.J., and C.J. Gust. (1999). “Taylor Rules in a Simple Limited Participation Model.” Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarida, Richard, Jordi Gali, and Mark Gertler. (1998). “Monetary Policy Rules and Macroeconomic Stability: Evidence and Some Theory.” NBER Working Paper No. 6442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, P.B., Douglas Laxton, and David Rose. (1996). “Asymmetry in the U.S. Output-Inflation Nexus: Issues and Evidence.” IMF Staff Papers 43, 216–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debelle, Guy, and Douglas Laxton. (1997). `Is the Phillips Curve Really a Curve? Some Evidence for Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States“ Staff Papers , International Monetary Fund 44, 249–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faust, J.W., and L.E.O. Svensson. (1998). “Credibility and Transparency: Monetary Policy with Unobservable Goals.” NBER Working Paper 6452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City. (1996). Achieving Price Stability: A Symposium (Kansas City, Missouri).

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, Robert, and Peter Isard. (1989). “Monetary Policy Strategies.” Staff Papers , International Monetary Fund 36,612–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flood, Robert, and Peter Isard. (1990). “Monetary Policy Strategies-A Correction.” Staff Papers , International Monetary Fund 37, 446–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuhrer, J.C., and G.R. Moore. (1995a). “Inflation Persistence.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 109,127–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuhrer, J.C., and G.R. Moore. (1995b). “Monetary Policy Trade-offs and the Correlation Between Nominal Interests Rates and Real Output” American Economic Review 85, 219–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuhrer, J.C. (1997). “The (Un) Importance of Forward-Looking Behavior in Price Specifications.” The Journal of Money Credit and Banking 29, 338–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J.K. (1997). “Time to Ditch the NAIRU.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 11(1), 93–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, R. J. (1997). “The Time-Varying NAIRU and its Implications for Economic Policy.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 11(1) 11–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haldane, Andrew G. (ed.). (1995). Targeting Inflation. London: Bank of England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haldane, A. G. and Nicoletta Batini. (1999). “Forward-Looking Rules for Monetary Policy,” in Taylor, 1999b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, Dale, and Jinill Kim. (1999). “Exact Utilities Under Alternative Monetary Rules in a Simple Macro Model with Optimizing Agents,” this volume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isard, Peter, and Douglas Laxton. (1998). “Monetary Policy with NAIRU Uncertainty and Endogenous Credibility: Perspectives on Policy Rules and the Gains from Experimentation and Transparency.” Forthcoming in Reserve Bank of New Zealand Conference Volume on Monetary Policy Under Uncertainty.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isard, Peter, and Douglas Laxton. and Ann-Charlotte Eliasson (1998). “Inflation Targeting with NAIRU Uncertainty and Endogenous Policy Credibility.” Forthcoming Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juillard, Michel, Douglas Laxton, Peter McAdam, and Hope Pioro. (1998). “An Algorithm Competition: First-Order Iterations Versus Newton-Based Techniques.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 22, 1291–1318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuttner, K.N. (1992). “Monetary Policy With Uncertain Estimates of Potential Output.” Reserve Bank of Chicago Economic Perspectives , 2–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuttner, K. N. (1994) “Estimating Potential Output as a Latent Variable.” Research Department, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 12(3), 55–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kydland, F.E., and E. C. Prescott. (1977). “Rules Rather than Discretion: The Inconsistency of Optimal Plans.” Journal of Political Economy 85, 473–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laxton, Douglas, David Rose, and Demosthenes Tambakis. (1999). “The U.S. Phillips Curve: The Case for Asymmetry.” Forthcoming Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laxton, Douglas, David Rose, and Demosthenes Tambakis, Guy Meredith, and David Rose. (1995). “Asymmetric Effects of Economic Activity on Inflation: Evidence and Policy Implications” Staff Papers , International Monetary Fund 42(2), 344–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leiderman, Leonardo, and Lars E. O. Svensson (eds.). (1995). Inflation Targets. London: Centre of Economic Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, Andrew, Volker Wieland, and John Williams. (1999). “Robustness of Simple Monetary Policy Rules Under Model Uncertainty,” in Taylor, 1999b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohmann, Susanne. (1990). “Monetary Policy Strategies-A Correction: Comment on Flood and Isard” Staff Papers , International Monetary Fund 37, 440–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, Phillip (ed.). (1997). Monetary Policy and Inflation Targeting. Sydney: Reserve Bank of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCallum, B.T. (1988). “Robustness Properties of a Rule for Monetary Policy.” Carnegie-Rochester Series on Public Policy 29, 173–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCallum, B.T. and Edward Nelson. (1998). “Nominal Income Targeting in an Open-Economy Optimizing Model.” Prepared for Sveriges Riksbank-IIES Conference on Monetary Policy Rules, Stockholm (June 12–13).

    Google Scholar 

  • McCallum, B.T. and Edward Nelson. (1999) “Performance of Operational Policy Rules in an Estimated Semi-Classical Structural Model,” in Taylor, 1999b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orphanides, Athanasios. (1998). “Monetary Policy Evaluation With Noisy Information” Working Paper, Federal Reserve Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson, Torsten, and Guido Tabellini. (1990). “Macroeconomic Policy, Credibility and Politics.” New York: Hardwood Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogerson, Richard. (1997). “Theory Ahead of Language in the Economics of Unemployment.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 11(1), 73–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, Kenneth. (1985). “The Optimal Degree of Commitment to an International Monetary Target.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 100, 1169–1189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudebusch, Glenn, and Lars Svensson. (1999). “Policy Rules for Inflation Targeting,” in Taylor, 1999b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaling, Eric. (1998). “The Nonlinear Phillips Curve and Inflation Forecast Targeting-Symmetric versus Asymmetric Monetary Policy Rules.” Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smets, Frank. (1998). “Output Gap Uncertainty: Does It Matter for the Taylor Rule?” Forthcoming in Reserve Bank of New Zealand conference volume on Monetary Policy Under Uncertainty.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staiger, Douglas, J.H. Stock, and M.W. Watson. (1997). “The NAIRU, Unemployment and Monetary Policy.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 11(1) 33–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, Joseph. (1997). “Reflections on the Natural Rate Hypothesis.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 11(1) 3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, L. E. O. (1999a). “Inflation Targeting as a Monetary Policy Rule,” Journal of Monetary Economics 43(3), 607–654; forthcoming in Taylor, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, L. E. O. (1999b). “Monetary Policy Issues for the Eurosystem” Forthcoming in Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J.B. (1993). “Discretion Versus Policy Rules in Practice.” Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 39, 195–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J.B. (1998). “The Robustness and Efficiency of Monetary Policy Rules as Guidelines for Interest Rate Setting by the European Central Bank” Prepared for Sveriges Riksbank-IIES Conference on Monetary Policy Rules, Stockholm (June 12–13).

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J.B. (1999a). “A Historical Analysis of Monetary Policy Rules.” NB ER Working Paper No. 6768; forthcoming in Taylor, 1999b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J.B. (ed.). (1999b). Monetary Policy Rules. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieland, Volker. (1998). “Monetary Policy and Uncertainty about the Natural Unemployment Rate.” Finance and Economics Discussion Paper No. 22, Federal Reserve Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. C. (1999). “Simple Rules for Monetary Policy.” Draft.

    Google Scholar 

References

  • Rubinstein, Mark. (1976). “The Valuation of Uncertain Income Streams and the Pricing of Options.” Bell Journal of Economics 7, 407–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudebusch, G.D., and L.E. O. Svensson. (1999). “Policy Rules for Inflation Targeting.” in Taylor (1999), forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaling, Eric. (1999). “The Nonlinear Phillips Curve and Inflation Forecast Targeting—Symmetric versus Asymmetric Monetary Policy Rules.” Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, L.E. O. (1999a). “Inflation Targeting as a Monetary Policy Rule.” Journal of Monetary Economics 43, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, Lars E. O. (19996). “Price Stability as a Target for Monetary Policy: Defining and Maintaining Price Stability.” Presented at Deutsche Bundesbank’s conference on The Monetary Transmission Process: Recent Developments and Lessons for Europe, March 26–27, 1999.http://www.iies.su.se/leosven/

  • Taylor, J.B. (ed.). (1999). Monetary Policy Rules. Chicago University Press, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

References

  • Clarida, R., J. Gali, and M. Gertler. (1998). “Monetary Policy Rules and Macroeconomic Stability: Evidence and Some Theory.” NBER Working Paper No. 6442, March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, A., V. Wieland, and J. Williams. (1999). “Robustness of Simple Monetary Policy Rules Under Model Uncertainty,” in J. B. Taylor (ed.), Monetary Policy Rules. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. B. (1999). “The Robustness and Efficiency of Monetary Policy Rules as Guidelines for Interest Rate Setting by the European Central Bank.” Journal of Monetary Economics 43, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Federal Reserve Board, Germany

    Dale W. Henderson

  2. University of Virginia, USA

    Jinill Kim

Authors
  1. Dale W. Henderson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jinill Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Peter Isard Assaf Razin Andrew K. Rose

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Henderson, D.W., Kim, J. (1999). Exact Utilities under Alternative Monetary Rules in a Simple Macro Model with Optimizing Agents. In: Isard, P., Razin, A., Rose, A.K. (eds) International Finance and Financial Crises. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4004-1_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4004-1_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5770-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4004-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation