Skip to main content

The Theoretical Analysis of Industrial Policy

  • Chapter
Industrial Policies After 2000

Part of the book series: Recent Economic Thought ((RETH,volume 72))

Abstract

The central purpose of this chapter is to explore some of the theoretical issues involved in the analysis of industrial policy. In doing so, we start from the proposition that there is not (and probably never can be) a single coherent theory of industrial policy, but rather different theoretical perspectives on and aspects of industrial policy. It is a rather obvious (if not always acknowledged) point to say that the analysis of industrial policy and strategy has to deal with three interrelated elements, namely the analysis of the operation of a market economy which includes the nature of markets and of competition as well as of networks and industrial and spatial clusters, the nature of the State activity, and the role of specific policy instruments. The focus of this chapter is on the first two of those, and limitations of space preclude discussion of specific industrial policies. We also offer some remarks on the constraints imposed by globalization on the pursuit of industrial policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Amsden, A. 1989. Asia’s Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization, New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Amsden, A., J. Kochanowicz and L. Taylor 1994. The Market Meets its Match, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auerbach, P. 1988. Competition: the Economics of Industrial Change, Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol W., J. Panzar and R. Willig 1982. Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industrial Structure.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berle, A.A. and G.C. Means 1932. Modern Corporation and Private Property, New York: Harcourt, Brace and World

    Google Scholar 

  • Best, M.H. 1990. The New Competition, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H-J 1993. “The Political Economy of Industrial Policy in Korea”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 17, 131–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H-J 1994. The Political Economy of Industrial Policy, London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H-J and R. Rowthorn 1995. “Role of the State in Economic Change: Entrepreneurship and Conflict Management”. In H-J Chang and R. Rowthom eds. The Role of the State in Economic Change, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H-J, H-J Park and C.G. Yoo 1998. “Interpreting the Korean Crisis: Financial Liberalization, Industrial Policy, and Corporate Governance”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 22, forthcoming

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifton, J. 1977. “Competition and the Evolution of the Capitalist Mode of Production”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. 1937. “The Nature of the Firm”, Economica, Vol. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowling, K. 1987. “An Industrial Strategy for Britain”, International Review of Applied Economics,Vol. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowling, K. and R. Sugden 1994. Beyond Capitalism, London: Frances Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, P. 1990. Collected Writings of Paul Davidson, Vol. 1, London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fourie, F.C. 1989. “The Nature of Firms and Markets: Do Transactions Approaches Help?”, South African Journal of Economics, Vol. 57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J.K. 1967. The New Industrial State,London: Hamish Hamilton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, D. 1996. Fat and Mean, New York: Martin Kessler Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A. 1970. Exit, Voice and Loyalty, Cambrdige, Mass: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, P. and G. Thompson 1996. Globalization in Question: The International Economy and the Possibilities, Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutton, W. 1995. The State We’re In, London: Jonathan Cape.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C. 1982. MITI and the Japanese Miracle: the Growth of Industrial Policy,1925–1975, Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, N. 1972. “The Irrelevance of Equilibrium Economics”, Economic Journal, Vol. 82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J.M. 1936. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money,London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinknecht, A. and J. ter Wengel 1998. “The Myth of Economic Globalization”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 22, 637–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, F. 1921. Risk, Uncertainty and Profit, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavoie, D. 1985. Rivalry and Central Planning: the Socialist Calculation Debate Reconsidered, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leftwich, A. 1995. “Bringing Politics Back In: Towards a Model of the Development State”, Journal of Development Studies, Vol. 31, No. 3, 400–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindbeck, A. and D. Snower 1988. The Insider Outsider Theory of Employment and Unemployment, Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, E.H. 1989. “Neither Friends nor Strangers: Informal Networks of Subcontracting in French Industry”. In D. Gambetta ed. Trust: Making and Breaking of Cooperative Relations, Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marquand, D. 1988. The Unprincipled Society,London: Fontana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marris, R. 1972. “Why Economics Needs a Theory of the Firm”, Economic Journal,Vol. 82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. 1976. Capital Vol. 1, Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myrdal, G. 1944. The American Dilemma: the Negro Problem and Modern Democracy, New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myrdal, G. 1957. Economic Theory and Underdeveloped Regions,London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myrdal, G. 1968. Asian Drama: An Inquiry into the Poverty of Nations, New York: Twentieth Century Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolan, P. 1993. State and Market in the Chinese Economy,London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nolan, P. 1996. “Post-Stalinist System Reform in China and Russia: Contrast and Implications”. In P. Arestis, G. Palma and M. Sawyer eds. Markets, Unemployment and Economic Policy: Essays in Honour of Geoff Harcourt, Volume Two, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, J.V.C. 1997. “Thinking About the State: Property Rights, Trade, and Changing Contractual Arrangements in a World with Coercion”. In J.N. Drobak and J.V.C. Nye eds. The Frontiers of the New Institutional Economics, San Diego: Academic Press, 121–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Önis, Z. 1991. “The Logic of the Developmental State”, Comparative Politics,October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. 1994. Competitive Advantage through People: Unleashing the Power of the Workforce, Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piore, M.J. and C.F. Sabel 1984. The Second Industrial Divide, New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W.W. 1990. “Neither Market nor Hierarchy: Network Forms of Organization”, Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 12, 295–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, M. 1992. “On the Theory of Industrial Policy and Strategy”. In K. Cowling and R. Sugden eds. Current Issues in Industrial Economic Strategy Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, M. 1992a. “The Nature and Role of the Market”, Social Concept, Vol. 6, No. 2. (A slightly revized version appeared in C. Pitelis ed. Transaction Costs, Markets and Hierarchies, Oxford: Blackwell, 1993.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J.A. 1950. Capitalism, Socialism and Demoncracy, New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shackle, G. 1961. Decision, Order and Time in Human Affairs, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, N. 1991. “Firms, Markets and Innovation”, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Vol. 14, No. 1, 49–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, A. 1994. “Institutional Requirements for Full Employment in Advanced Economies”, International Labour Review, Vol. 134, 471–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, A. 1996. “Expanding Employment in the Global Economy”, In P. Arestis, G. Palma and M. Sawyer eds. Markets, Unemployment and Economic Policy: Essays in Honour of Geoff Harcourt, Volume Two, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. 1994. Whither Socialism, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. and A. Weiss 1981. “Credit Rationing in Markets with Imperfect Information”, American Economic Review, Vol. 71, 393–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabb, W.K. 1995. The Postwar Japanese System, New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, G. 1991. “Networks: Introduction”. In G. Thompson, J. Frances, R. Levacic and J. Mitchell, Markets, Hierarchies and Networks, London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, R. 1990. Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.E. 1986. Economic Organization,Firms, Markets and Policy Control, Brighton: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sawyer, M. (2000). The Theoretical Analysis of Industrial Policy. In: Elsner, W., Groenewegen, J. (eds) Industrial Policies After 2000. Recent Economic Thought, vol 72. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3996-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3996-0_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5766-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-3996-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics