Abstract
This chapter presents a meta-methodology for addressing the issue of how the information contained within Design for X (DFX) techniques can be organised such that the implications of decisions are proactively evaluated. By applying only those guidelines that are of value to the emerging design at a particular stage during the product development process a more efficient methodology for guideline utilisation is synthesised. This meta-methodology also determines the relative importance of each guideline and the nature of the interactions that occur between competing DFX techniques. To place the methodology into context an illustrative example is presented. The example is used to provide a more detailed understanding of how to apply the methodology and to draw out some of the issues that arise through its application.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Boothroyd, G., Dewhurst, P. (1989) Product Design for Assembly, Boothroyd Dewhurst Inc. Wakefield, USA.
Meerkamm, H. (1994) Design for X — A Core Area of Design Methodology, Journal of Engineering Design, 5(2), 145–163.
Norell, M. (1993) The Use of DFA, FMEA and QFD as Tools for Concurrent Engineering in Product Development Processes, Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Engineering Design, The Hague, Netherlands. 2, 867–874.
Pahl, G., Beitz, W. (1988) Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach, (English version Edited by K. Wallace), The Design Council, London.
Simon, M., Dowie, T. (1992) Disassembly Process Planning, Technical Report DDR/TR2, The Manchester Metropolitan University.
Simon, M., Fogg, B., Chambellant, F. (1992) Design for Cost Effective Disassembly, Technical Report DDR/TRI, The Manchester Metropolitan University.
Thurston, D. (1991) A Formal Method for Subjective Design Evaluation with Multiple Attributes, Research in Engineering Design, 3(2), 105–122.
Watson, B., Radcliffe, D. (1995) A Comparison of DFX Evaluation Tools, Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Engineering Design, Praha, Czech Republic.
Willcox, M., Sheldon, D. (1993) How the Design Team in management terms will handle the DFX tools, Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Engineering Design, The Hague, Netherlands, 2, 875–881.
Zhang, B., Simon, M., Dowie, T. (1993) Initial Investigation of Design Guidelines and Assessment of Design for Disassembly, Technical Report DDRTR03, The Manchester Metropolitan University.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1996 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Watson, B., Radcliffe, D., Dale, P. (1996). A Meta-Methodology for the Application of DFX Design Guidelines. In: Huang, G.Q. (eds) Design for X. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3985-4_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3985-4_22
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5762-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-3985-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive