Skip to main content

University Restructuring: The Role of Economic and Political Contexts

  • Chapter
Book cover Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research

Part of the book series: Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research ((HATR,volume 14))

Abstract

Within the study of higher education, restructuring is a term commonly used to characterize contemporary university responses to financial stress. While the study of responses to fiscal challenges has been prominent in the higher education literature since the 1970s, this chapter proposes that the substantive focus in the literature must shift from studies of retrenchment and cost containment to analyses of university repositioning and selective reinvestment in light of changing environmental demands (Gumport and Pusser, 1997).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, R., and Meyerson, J. (eds.). (1992). Productivity and Higher Education. Princeton: Peterson’s Guides.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archie-Hudson, M. (1993). Letter to President Peltason. October 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronowitz, S. (1997). The last good job in America, Social Text 15(2): 93–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barak, R. (1984). State Level Academic Program Review. Denver, CO: State Higher Education Executive Officers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, T. (1991). Measure 5 commentary. Oregon State System of Higher Education Office of the Chancellor. January 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berdahl, R. (1971). Statewide Coordination in Higher Education. Washington, DC: American Council of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berdahl, R. (1990). Public universities and state governments. Educational Record 71(1): 38–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. (1970). A formal theory of differentiation in organizations. American Sociological Review 35, 201–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. (1973). The Organization of Academic Work. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloland, H.G. (1995). Postmodernism and higher education, Journal of Higher Education 66: 521–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, H.R. (1974). Financing higher education: The current state of the debate. In K. E. Young (ed.), Exploring the Case for Low Tuition in Public Higher Education. Iowa City: AASU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, H.R. (1980). The Costs of Higher Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brand, M., (1991). Letter to the University Community, University of Oregon, January 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breneman, D.W. (1995). A state of emergency? Higher education in California. (Center Report 95–2). California Higher Education Policy Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breneman, D.W., Estrada, L.F., and Hayward, G.C. (1995) Tidal wave II: An evaluation of enrollment projections for California in higher education.“ (Center Report 95–6). California Higher Education Policy Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breneman, D.W., and Finney, J. (1997). The changing landscape: Higher education finance in the 1990s. (Center Report 97–2). California Higher Education Policy Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchbinder, H., and Rajagopal, P. (1993). Canadian universities and the politics of fund-ing. In P.G. Altbach and D.B. Johnstone (eds). The Funding of Higher Education: International Perspectives. New York: Garland Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrell, G., and Morgan G. (1979). Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis: Elements of the Sociology of Corporate Life. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • California Higher Education Policy Center. (1994). Time for decision: California’s legacy and the future of higher education. (Center Report 94–1).

    Google Scholar 

  • California Higher Education Policy Center. (1997). A promise worth keeping. Cross Talk 5(2): May.

    Google Scholar 

  • California Postsecondary Education Commission. (1993). Undergraduate student charges and short-term financial aid policies at California’s public universities: Recommendations of the California Postsecondary Education Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnegie Commission on Higher Education. (1973). Higher Education: Who Pays? Who Benefits? Who Should Pay?. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, K.S., and Tschirhart, M. (1992). Postindustrial environments and organizational effectiveness in colleges and universities. Journal of Higher Education 63: 87–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carnoy, M., and Levin, H.M. (1985). Schooling and Work in the Democratic State. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, J. I. (1995). California: The enduring crisis. In S. D. Gold, (ed.), The Fiscal Crisis of the States: Lessons for the Future. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chronicle of Higher Education Almanac. (1997). National Science Foundation Data, Academic R and D Expenditures, XLIV(1): August 29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B.R. (1983). The Higher Education System: Academic Organization in Cross-national Perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B.R. (1993). The problem of complexity in modern higher education. In S. Rothblatt and B. Wittrock (eds.), The European and American University Since 1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B.R. (1995a). Case studies of innovative universities: A progress report. In 17th annual forum of the European Association for Institutional Research (EAIR). Zurich, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B.R. (1995b). “Complexity and differentiation: the deepening problem of university integration.” In D. Dill and B. Sporn (eds.), Emerging Patterns of Social Demand and University Reform: Through a Glass Darkly. Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clotfelter, C.T. (1994). Cost escalation in private research universities: Preliminary findings for arts and sciences at two institutions. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clotfelter, C.T., and Rothschild, M. (eds.). (1993). Studies of Supply and Demand in Higher Education. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, J. (1993). Balancing acts: Dilemmas of choice facing research universities. Daedalus 122(4): 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth of Virginia Commission on the University of the 21st Century. (1989). University of Virginia Office of the Vice President and Provost. The case for change.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cope, R. (1978). Strategic Policy Planning. Littleton, CO: Ireland Educational Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cope, R., and Delaney, G. (1991). Academic program review: A market strategy. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education 3: 63–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, G.K. (1997). Twenty years of higher education in Virginia. State Council of Higher Education for Virginia (SCHEV).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dill, D., and Sporn, B. (1995). The implications of a postindustrial environment for the university: An introduction. In D. Dill and B. Sporn (eds.), Emerging Patterns of Social Demand and University Reform: Through a Glass Darkly,Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1933). The Division of Labor in Society. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Figlio, D.N. (1997). Short-term effects of a 1990s-era property tax limit: Panel evidence on Oregon’s measure 5. Department of Economics,University of Oregon,Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, B. (1976). A framework for academic planning. Journal of Higher Education XLVII: 65–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladieux, L., Hauptman, A., and Knapp, L. (1994). The federal government in higher education. In P. Altbach, R. Berdahl, and P.J. Gumport, Higher education in American Society. Amherst: Prometheus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold, S.D. (ed.). (1995). The Fiscal Crisis of the States: Lessons for the Future. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griswold, C., and Marine, G. (1996). A case study analysis of political influences on state tuition and aid policy. Review of Higher Education 19: 361–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gumport, P. (1993). The contested terrain of academic program reduction. The Journal of Higher Education 64: 283–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gumport, P., and Pusser, B. (1995). A case of bureaucratic accretion: Context and consequences. Journal of Higher Education 66: 493–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gumport, P., and Pusser, B. (1997). Restructuring the academic environment. In M.W. Peterson, D. Dill, and L.A. Mets, Planning and Management for a Changing Environment. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guskin, A.E. (1994a). Reducing student costs and enhancing student learning part II: Restructuring the role of faculty. Change 26: 16–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guskin, A.E. (1994b). Reducing student costs and enhancing student learning: The university challenge of the 1990s. Part I: Restructuring the administration. Change 26: 22–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halstead, D K (1974). Statewide planning in higher education. Dept. of HEW. In M. Hammer and J. Champy (eds.). (1993). Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, W.L. and Weisbrod, B.A. (1969). Benefits, Cost and Finance of Public Higher Education. Chicago: Markham Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauptman, A.M. (1990). The College Tuition Spiral. Washington D.C.: American Council on Education and the College Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayden, T. (1993). Why college doors are closing. The New York Times, March 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hearn, J. (1988). Strategy and resources. In J. Smart (ed.). Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and research,Vol. IV. New York: Agathon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, D.S.P., and Massy, W.F. (1981). Planning Models for Colleges and Universities. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hossler, D. and Lund, J.P. (1997). State funding for higher education. Journal of Higher Education 68(2): 160–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyatt, J. (1993). Strategic restructuring: A case study. In W.E. Vandament and D.P. Jones (eds.). Financial Management. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikenberry, S. (1971). The organizational dilemma. Journal of Higher Education. XLIII: 23–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inside UVA.(1993a). Sustaining and building excellence in difficult times: initial report. Office of University Relations,University of Virginia, January 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inside UVA.(1993b). University reaction to the SCHEV report: A thumbnail chronology. Office of University Relations,University of Virginia, January 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inside UVA.(1993c). Senate committee reviewing proposed program cut. Office of University Relations,University of Virginia, December 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inside UVA.(1994). Wilder’s proposed budget gives SCHEV restructuring club. Office of University Relations,University of Virginia, January 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inside UVA.(1995). 96–98 budget proposal includes law and business tuition surcharges. Office of University Relations,University of Virginia, November 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, J. (1994). Mining the golden state: The UO goes prospecting for out-of-state tuitions and strikes it rich just south of the border. Register Guard. (Eugene, OR), November 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (1993). Towards a Schumpeterian workfare state?“ Studies in Political Economy 40, 7–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, G. (1983). Academic Strategy: The Management Revolution in American Higher Education. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, D. (1993). Making choices in the research university. Daedalus Fall (122):127–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, C. (1994a). Knowledge, ethics and the new academic culture. Change. January/February, 9–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, C. (1994b). Expanding access and changing missions: the federal role in U.S. higher education. Educational Record 75:27–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, C. (1995) (originally 1963). Preface. In C. Kerr (ed.), The Uses of the University. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, C. (1997). Speculations about the increasingly indeterminate future of higher education in the United States. The Review of Higher Education 20: 345–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kissler, G.R. (1997). Who decides which budgets to cut? Journal of Higher Education 68(4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Labaree, D.F. (1997). Public goods, private goods: The American struggle over educational goals. American Educational Research Journal, 34(1): 39–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, L.L., and Rhoades, G. (1995). Rising administrative costs: Seeking explanations. Journal of Higher Education 66: 187–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, L.L., and Brinkman, P. (1987). Student price response in higher education. Journal of Higher Education 58: 181–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, L.L., and Brinkman, P. (1988). The Economic Value of Higher Education. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, H.M. (1991). Raising productivity in higher education. Journal of Higher Education 62: 241–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Los Angeles Times Op Ed(1992). Putting the UC system under the microscope, p.B4, November 26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowen, R.S. (1997). Creating the Cold War University. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2: 71–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G., and J.P. Olsen. (1995). Democratic Governance. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, W.E. Provost. (1994). Discussion of 1995–96 regents’ budget proposal. Regents’ Meeting Transcript, San Francisco, October 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, W.E. Provost. (1995). Governor’s four year compact for budgetary stability. Regents’ Meeting Transcript, San Francisco, January 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massy, W.F. (1991). Improving productivity: What faculty think about it-and its effect on quality. Change 27(4): 10–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massy, W.F. (1994). Resource allocation reform in higher education. Washington, D.C.: National Association of College and University Business Officers (NACUBO).

    Google Scholar 

  • Massy, W.F (ed.). (1996). Resource Allocation in Higher Education. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massy, W.F., and Wilger, A.K. (1992). Productivity in postsecondary education: A new approach. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 14(4): 361–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massy, W.F., and Zemsky, R. (1994). Faculty discretionary time: Departments and the ‘academic ratchet’. Journal of Higher Education 65: 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massy, WE and Zemsky, R. (1995). Using information technology to enhance academic productivity. Paper based on Wingspread Conference, EDUCOM. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J.W., and Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology 83: 340–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyerson, J.W., and Massy, W.F. (1995). Revitalizing Higher Education. Princeton: Peterson’s Guides.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milam, J.H., Jr. (1991). The presence of paradigms in the core higher education journal literature. Research in Higher Education 32: 651–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mingle, J.R., and Associates. (1981). Challenges for Retrenchment. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minutes from the Academic Senate, University of California Berkeley, March 8, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monaghan, P. (1991). Oregon colleges plan ‘devastating surgery’ to survive state cut. Chronicle of Higher Education, p. A25, February 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortimer, K.P. and Tierney, W. (1979). The three “r’s” of the eighties: reduction, reallocation, and retrenchment. American Association for Higher Education, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newfield, C. (1997). Recapturing academic business. Social Text 51,15(2): 39–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, J.E. (1997). The cost-effectiveness of American higher education: The United States can afford its colleges and universities. In J. Smart (ed.), Higher Education Handbook of Theory and Research, Vol. XII. New York: Agathon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peltason, J.W. President. (1994). 1994–95 Governor’s budget for the University of California and UC budget plan. Remarks to the Regents’ Meeting, Los Angeles, January 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pencavel, J. (1997). The response of employees to severance pay incentives: Faculty of the University of California, 1991–94. Department of Economics, Stanford University.Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, M.W., and Dill, D.D. (1997). Understanding the competitive environment of the postsecondary knowledge industry. In M.W. Peterson, D.D. Dill, and L.A. Mets (eds.), Planning and Management for a Changing Environment. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pew. (1993a). A transatlantic dialogue. Policy Perspectives 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pew. (1993b). A call to meeting. Policy Perspectives 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pew. (1993c). An uncertain terrain. Policy Perspectives 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pew. (1993d) Summary of PEW roundtable discussions from April 6 and 7 meetings, University of Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pew. (1994). To dance with change. Policy Perspectives 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J., and Salancik, G.R. (1978). The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. (1992). Managing with Power: Politics and Influence in Organizations. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poterba, J.M. (1996). Demographic structure and the political economy of public education. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 5677, July, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramazani, R.K. (1994). Implications of the budget proposal, 1994–96. Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades, G. (1992). Beyond “the State”: Interorganizational relations and state apparatuses in post-secondary education. In J.C. Smart (ed.) Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research,Vol. VIII. New York: Agathon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades, G., and Slaughter, S. (1997). Academic capitalism, managed professionals, and supply-side higher education. Social Text,15(2): 9–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruppert, S.S. (1996). The politics of remedy: State legislative views on higher education. NEA National Center for Innovation and Office of Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W.R. (1998). Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirley, R., and Volkwein, F. (1978). Establishing academic program priorities. Journal of Higher Education 49: 472–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, S. (1990a). The “official” ideology of higher education: Ironies and inconsistencies.“ In W.G. Tierney (ed.), Culture and Ideology in Higher Education: Advancing a Critical Agenda. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, S. (1990b). The Higher Learning and High Technology: Dynamics of Higher Education Policy Formation. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, S. (1993). Retrenchment in the 1980s: The politics of prestige and gender. Journal of Higher Education 64(3): 250–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, S. and Rhoades, G. (1990). Renorming the social relations of academic science: Technology transfer. Educational Policy 4: 341–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, S. and Leslie, L.L. (1997). Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies, and the Entrepreneurial University. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • State Council for Higher Education in Virginia (SCHEV). (1991). Colleges and universities for the 21 st century: A report and proposals for continued improvement in Virginia higher education.

    Google Scholar 

  • State Council for Higher Education in Virginia (SCHEV). (1992). Statement to the joint house and senate education committees. Gordon K. Davies, Director, December.

    Google Scholar 

  • State Council for Higher Education in Virginia (SCHEV). (1993a). Change and improvement in Virginia higher education.

    Google Scholar 

  • State Council for Higher Education in Virginia (SCHEV). (1993b). The Virginia plan for higher education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trombley, W. (1995a). Ambitious reform agenda: Restructuring in Virginia higher education. CmssTalk 3(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Trombley, W. (1995b). Challenging the status quo. CmssTalk 3(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Trombley, W. (1997). Business higher education council: Virginia’s coalition of business and academic leaders plays political hardball. Cross Talk 5(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Trow, M. (1983). Reorganizing the biological sciences at Berkeley. Change 15: 44–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • University of California at Los Angeles, Office of the Chancellor. (1992). Arrowhead Report,November.

    Google Scholar 

  • University of California at Los Angeles. (1992). UCLA Today 14(4): 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • University of California Office of the President. (1994). Program impact of budget reductions 1990/91 through 1994/95. February.

    Google Scholar 

  • University of California Office of the President. (1996a). UC means business: the economic impact of the University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • University of California Office of the President. (1996b). Universities and the knowledge-based economy. Transcript of Remarks by President Richard C. Atkinson, University of California Berkeley, February 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • University of Oregon Budget Office. (1993). Summary draft--University of Oregon measure 5 cuts, July 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • University of Oregon Office of Vice President for Academic Affairs. (1991). Response to the budget cuts resulting from measure 5, January 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • University of Oregon Office of the President. (1991). A vision for the future: strategic plan 1992–1997, October.

    Google Scholar 

  • University of Virginia. (1992). Response to the report of the commission the university of the 21st century, November.

    Google Scholar 

  • University of Virginia Office of the President. (1992). Response to the report of the commission on the university of the 21st century. November.

    Google Scholar 

  • University of Virginia Office of the Vice President and Provost. (1993a). Plan for the year 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • University of Virginia Office of the Vice President and Provost. (1993b). Sustaining and building excellence in difficult times: The research university in the 1990s: The case of the University of Virginia. Steering Committee of the Assembly of Professors and the Faculty Senate.

    Google Scholar 

  • University of Virginia Office of the President. (1994). Targeting excellence. Report to the Secretary of Education, September 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • University of Virginia Office of the President. (1995). Targeting excellence: Self study.Report to Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS), November 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • University of Virginia Office of the President. (1996). Targeting excellence 1996 progress report on restructuring. October 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Virginia Council of Presidents. (1991). Colleges and universities for the 21st century: A report and proposals for continued improvement in Virginia higher education. State Council for Higher Education in Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Virginia Council of Presidents. (1993). The president’s response.

    Google Scholar 

  • Virginia General Assembly Appropriation Act. (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, D. (1994). Op Ed. Sacramento Bee, March 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessells, N.K. (1991). Summary of proposed academic program reductions and reorganizations. University of Oregon Office of the Vice President for Academic Affairs and Provost. January 28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilms, W.W., Teruya, C., and Walpole, M. (1997). Fiscal reform at UCLA. Change 29: 40–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zemsky, R., and Massy, W. (1990). Cost containment. Change 22: 16–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, X. (1993). The dynamics of organizational rules. American Journal of Sociology 98: 1134–1166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Agathon Press

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gumport, P.J., Pusser, B. (1999). University Restructuring: The Role of Economic and Political Contexts. In: Smart, J.C., Tierney, W.G. (eds) Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, vol 14. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3955-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3955-7_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-87586-126-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-3955-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics