Abstract
The present study is an attempt to discover some of the factors which influence readers’ comprehension when faced with several possible interpretations of a sentence, and whether any universal account can be postulated for this process across, if not all, at least closely related languages. This issue has indeed been the object of considerable debate (cf. Cuetos, Mitchell & Corely, 1996; Frazier & Clifton, 1996; Gibson, Pearlmutter, Canseco-Gonzales & Hickok, 1996, MacDonald, Pearlmutter & Seidenberg, 1994; for recent discussions).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bock, J.K. (1986). Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 355–387.
Bock, J.K. & Loebel, H. (1990). Framing sentences. Cognition, 35, 1–39.
Branigan, H. P., Pickering, M.J., Liversedge, S.P., Stewart, AJ. & Urbach, T.P. (1996). Syntactic priming: Investigating the mental representation of language. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 24, 489–506.
Brysbaert, M. & Mitchell, D.C. (1996). Modifier attachment in sentence parsing: Evidence from Dutch. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 664–695.
Carreiras, M. & Clifton, C. (1993). Relative clause interpretation preferences in Spanish and English. Language and Speech, 36, 353–372.
Clifton, C., Speer, S. & Abney, (1991). Parsing arguments: Phrase structure and argument structure as determinants of initial parsing decisions. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 251–271.
Corley, M. & Caldwell, C. (1996). Towards a simple statistical model of the HSPM. Poster presented at Architectures and Mechanisms of Language Processing (AMLaP), September 20-21st, Torino, Italy.
Cuetos, F. & Mitchell, D.C. (1988). Cross-linguistic differences in parsing: Restrictions on the late-closure strategy in Spanish. Cognition, 30, 73–105.
Cuetos, F., Mitchell, D.C. & Corley, M. (1996). Parsing in different languages. In M. Carreiras, J. Garcia-Albea and N. Sebastien-Galles (Eds.) Language Processing in Spanish Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
De Vincenzi, M. and Job, R. (1995). An investigation of late closure: The role of syntax, thematic structure and pragmatics in initial and final interpretations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 21, 1303–1321.
De Vincenzi, M. and Job, R. (1993). Some observations on the universality of the late closure strategy. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research,, 22, 189–206.
Frazier, L. (1987). Sentence processing: A tutorial review. In M. Coltheart (Ed). Attention and performance XII. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
Frazier, L. (1989). Against lexical generation of syntax. In W. Marslen-Wilson (Ed.). Lexical representation and process. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Frazier, L. (1990). Parsing modifiers: Special purpose routines in HSPM? In D.A. Balota, G.B. Flores d’Arcais & K. Rayner (Eds.), Comprehension Processes in Reading. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
Frazier, L. & Clifton, C. (1996). Construal. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.
Frenck-Mestre, C. (1997). Examining second language reading: An on-line look, in A. Sorace, C. Heycock and R. Shillcock (Eds.) Proceedings of the GALA ′97 Conference on Language Acquisition. Human Communication Research Centre: Edinburgh.
Frenck-Mestre, C. & Pynte, J. (1995). Lexical influences on parsing strategies: Evidence from eye movements. In J.M. Findlay, R.W. Kentridge & R. Walker (Eds.) Eye movement research: Mechanisms, Processes and Applications. Amsterdam: Elsevier, North Holland.
Frenck-Mestre, C. & Pynte, J. (1997). Syntactic ambiguity resolution while reading in second and native languages. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50A, 119–148.
Gibson, E., Pearlmutter, N., Canseco-Gonzales, E. & Hickok, G. (1996). Cross-linguistic attachment preferences: Evidence from English and Spanish. Cognition, 59, 23–59.
Gibson, E., Schutze, C. & Saloman, A. (1996). The relationship between the frequency and complextity of linguistic structure. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25, 59–92.
Gilboy, E., Sopena, J.M., Clifton, C. & Frazier, L. (1995). Argument structure and association preferences in Spanish and English complex NPs. Cognition, 54, 131–167.
Gilboy, E., & Sopena, J.M. (1996) Segmentation effects in processing complex noun pronouns with relative clauses. In M. Carreiras, J. Garcia-Albea and N. Sebastien-Galles (Eds.) Language Processing in Spanish Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
Hill, R. & Murray, W.S. (in press). The role of punctuation in parsing. In A. Kennedy and J. Pynte (Eds.).
MacDonald, M.C., Pearlmutter, N.J. & Seidenberg, M.S. (1994). Lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review, 101, 676–703.
Mitchell, D.C. (1994). Sentence parsing. In M.A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics. New York: Academic Press.
Mitchell, D.C. & Brysbaert, M. (in press). Challenges to recent theories of cross-linguistic variation in parsing: Evidence from Dutch. In D. Hillert (Ed.) Sentence processing: A cross-linguistic perspective. Academic Press.
Mitchell, D.C, Brysbaert, M. & Grondelaers, S. (1997). An evaluation of exposure-based accounts of ambiguity resolution: Evidence from Dutch. Paper presented at Architectures and Mechanisms of Language Processing (AMLaP), Sept. 11th-13th, Edinburgh.
Pynte, J. & Colonna, S. (1998). Relative Clause attachment revisited: French readers sometimes prefer to attach low. Poster presented at Architectures and Mechanisms of Language Processing (AMLaP), Sept. Frieburg, Germany.
Sedivy, J. & Spivey-Knowlton, M. (1994). The use of structural, lexical and pragmatic information in parsing attachment ambiguities. In C. Clifton, L. Frazier and K. Rayner (Eds.), Perspectives on sentence processing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Steedman, M.J. (1989). Grmmar, interpretation, and processing from the lexicon. In D.A, Balota, G.B. Flores d’Arcais & K.Z Rayner (Eds.), Comprehension Processes in Reading. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
Tanenhaus, M.K. & Carlson, G.N. (1989). Lexical structure and language comprehension. In D.A. Balota, G.B. Flores dArcais & K. Rayner (Eds.), Comprehension Processes in Reading. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
Zagar, D,, Pynte, J. & Rativeau, S. (1997). Evidence for early closure attachment on first-pass reading times in French. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50A, 421–438.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Frenck-Mestre, C., Pynte, J. (2000). Resolving Syntactic Ambiguities: Cross-Linguistic Differences?. In: De Vincenzi, M., Lombardo, V. (eds) Cross-Linguistic Perspectives on Language Processing. Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics, vol 25. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3949-6_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3949-6_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-0292-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-3949-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive