Abstract
Jacobs (1980,1991) and Rullmann (1995) claim that lexical decomposition of the German determiner kein ‘no’ and its Dutch counterpart geen ‘no’ is necessary to account for readings in which a scope-bearing operator such as an intensional verb or a universal quantifier intervenes between the negation and the existential quantifier part of the determiner. In this paper, I argue that lexical decomposition is not only undesirable, but empirically incorrect. As an alternative, I develop a higher-order interpretation of negative quantifiers in terms of quantification over properties. The analysis is built on the observation that split readings are restricted to monotone decreasing NPs in predicative positions.
I wish to thank Cleo Condoravdi, Paul Dekker, Donka Farkas, Manfred Krifka, Hotze Rullmann, Ivan Sag, Ede Zimmermann, and the participants of the semantics workshop at Stanford and the workshop on reference and anaphorical relations at Konstanz for helpful comments and suggestions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abusch, D. 1994. The Scope of Indefinites. Natural Language Semantics 2, 83–135.
Beck, G. 1955/57. Studien über das Deutsche Verbum infinitum. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Ben-Shalom, D. 1993. Object Wide Scope and Semantic Trees. Proceedings of the Third Conference on Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT 3), Ithaca/NY: DMLL Publications, 19–37.
Carlson, G. 1977. Reference to Kinds in English. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Distributed by Bloomington/IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club. Also by New York: Garland University Press (1979).
Chierchia, G. 1984. Topics in the Syntax and Semantics of Infinitives and Gerunds. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Distributed by Amherst/MA: Graduate Linguistics Student Association (GLSA).
Cooper, R. 1983 Quantification and Syntactic Theory. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Dahl, Ö. 1993. Negation. In: J. Jacobs & A. von Stechow & Th. Vennemann (eds.). Syntax: An International Handbook. Berlin: de Gruyter, 914–923.
Dekker, P. 1993. Trans sentential Meditations: Ups and Downs in Dynamic Semantics. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Amsterdam. Distributed by Institute for Logic, Language and Computation (ILLC), University of Amsterdam.
Diesing, M. 1992. Indefinites. Cambridge/MA: MIT Press.
van Geenhoven, V. 1998. Semantic Incorporation and Indefinite Descriptions. Semantic and Syntactic Aspects of Noun Incorporation in West Greenlandic. Stanford/CA: CSLI Publications.
Farkas, D. 1995. Specificity and Scope. In: L. Nash & G. Tsoulas (eds.). Langues et Grammaire. Vol. 1,119–137.
Fodor, J. & Sag, I. 1982. Referential and Quantificational Indefinites. Linguistics and Philosophy 5, 355–398.
Geurts, B. 1996. On No. Journal of Semantics 13, 67–86.
Hendriks, H. 1993. Studied Flexibility: Categories and Types in Syntax and Semantics. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Amsterdam.
de Hoop, H. 1992. Case Configuration and Noun Phrase Interpretation. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Groningen.
Jacobs, J. 1980. Lexical Decomposition in Montague Grammar. Theoretical Linguistics 7, 121–136.
Jacobs, J. 1991. Negation. In: A. von Stechow & D. Wunderlich (eds.). Semantics: An International Handbook. Berlin: de Gruyter, 560–596.
Klima, E. 1964. Negation in English. In: J. Fodor & J. Katz. The Structure of Language. Englewood Cliffs/NJ: Prentice-Hall, 246–323.
Kratzer, A. 1995. Stage-Level and Individual-Level Predicates. In: G. Carlson & F. Pelletier (eds.). The Generic Book. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 125–175.
Partee, B. 1987. Noun Phrase Interpretation and Type Shifting Principles. In: J. Groenendijk & D. de Jongh & M. Stokhof (eds.). Studies in Discourse Representation Theory and the Theory of Generalized Quantifiers. Dordrecht: Foris, 115–144.
Pollard, C. & Sag, I. 1994. Head Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ruys, E. 1993. The Scope of Indefinites. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Utrecht.
Rullmann, H. 1995. Geeneenheid. Tabu 25, 194–197.
de Swart, H. 1995. Negation: Scope and Anaphora. In: H. Kamp & B. Partee (eds.) 1997. Proceedings of the Workshop “Context Dependence in the Analysis of Linguistic Meaning ”. Vol. II: Comments and Replies. Institut für maschinelle Sprachverarbeitung, Universität Stuttgart, 191–205.
de Swart, H. 1997. Indefinites in a Type-Shifting Perspective. In: P. Dekker & M. Stokhof & Y. Venema (eds.). Proceedings of the Eleventh Amsterdam Colloquium. Institute for Logic, Language and Computation (ILLC), University of Amsterdam, 283-288.
Zimmermann, T. “E.” 1993. On the Proper Treatment of Opacity in Certain Verbs. Natural Language Semantics 1, 149–179.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
De Swart, H. (2000). Scope Ambiguities with Negative Quantifiers. In: von Heusinger, K., Egli, U. (eds) Reference and Anaphoric Relations. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, vol 72. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3947-2_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3947-2_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-0291-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-3947-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive