Abstract
The paper sketches the place of dynamic semantics within a broader picture of developments in philosophical and linguistic theories of meaning. Some basic concepts of dynamic semantics are illustrated by means of a detailed analysis of anaphoric definite and indefinite descriptions, which are treated as contextually dependent quantificational expressions. It is shown how a dynamic view sheds new light on the contextual nature of interpretation, on the difference between monologue and dialogue, and on the interplay between direct and indirect information.
A Dutch version of this paper, entitled ‘Betekenis in Beweging’, appeared in: Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte, 90-1, 1998, 26–53.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Beaver, D. 1995. Presupposition and Assertion in Dynamic Semantics. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Edinburgh.
Beaver, D. 1997. Presupposition. In: J. van Benthem & A. ter Meulen (eds.) Handbook of Logic and Language. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 939–1008.
Chierchia, G. 1995. Dynamics of Meaning. Anaphora, Presupposition, and the Theory of Grammar. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Dekker, P. 1993. Existential Disclosure. Linguistics and Philosophy 16, 561–587.
Dekker, P. 1997. On Context and Identity. In: H. Kamp & B. Partee (eds.) Proceedings of the Workshop “Context Dependence in the Analysis of Linguistic Meaning ”. Vol. I: Papers. Universität Stuttgart, Institut für maschinelle Sprach Verarbeitung, 87-115.
Dummett, M. 1993. Origins of Analytical Philosophy. London: Duckworth.
van Eijck, J. 1993. The Dynamics of Description. Journal of Semantics 10, 239–267.
Føllesdal, D. 1982. Husserl’s Notion of Noema. In: H. Dreyfus & H. Hall (eds.) Husserl, Intentionality and Cognitive Science. Cambridge/MA: MIT Press, 73–80.
Francez, N. & Berg, J. 1994. A Multi-Agent Extension of DRT. Technical Report LCL 94-99, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa.
Gerbrandy, J. 1998. Bisimulations on Planet Kripke. Ph.D. dissertation. ILLC/Department of Philosophy, University of Amsterdam.
Groenendijk, J. & Stokhof, M. 1990. Dynamic Montague Grammar. In: L. Káimán & L. Polos (eds.) Papers from the Second Symposium on Logic and Language. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó, 3–48.
Groenendijk, J. & Stokhof, M. 1991. Dynamic Predicate Logic. Linguistics and Philosophy 14, 39–100.
Groenendijk, J. & Stokhof, M. 1997. Questions. In: J. van Benthem & A. ter Meulen (eds.) Handbook of Logic and Language. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1055–1124.
Groenendijk, J. & Stokhof, M. & Veltman, F. 1995. Coreference and Contextually Restricted Quantification. Proceedings of the Fifth Conference on Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT 5), 112–129.
Groenendijk, J. & Stokhof, M. & Veltman, F. 1996a. This Might Be It. In: J. Seligman & D. Westerståhl (eds.) Proceedings of the 1994 Moraga Workshop. Stanford/CA: CSLI Publications, 255–270.
Groenendijk, J. & Stokhof, M. & Veltman, F. 1996b. Conference and Modality. In: S. Lappin (ed.). The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory. Oxford: Blackwell, 179–213.
Groenendijk, J. & Stokhof, M. & Veltman, F. 1997. Coreference and Modality in Multi-Speaker Discourse. In: H. Kamp & B. Partee (eds.) Proceedings of the Workshop “Context Dependence in the Analysis of Linguistic Meaning ”. Vol. I: Papers. Universität Stuttgart, Institut für maschinelle Sprachverarbeitung, 195-217.
Groeneveld, W. 1995. Logical Investigations into Dynamic Semantics. Ph.D. dissertation. ILLC/Department of Philosophy, University of Amsterdam.
Heim, I. 1982. The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Distributed by Ann Arbor: University Microfilms.
Heim, I. 1983. File Change Semantics and the Familiarity Theory of Definiteness. In: R. Bäuerle & C. Schwarze & A. von Stechow (eds.) Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language. Berlin: de Gruyter, 164–189.
von Heusinger, K. 1997. Definite Descriptions and Choice Functions. In: S. Akama (ed.). Logic, Language and Computation. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 61–91.
Hintikka, J. 1983. The Game of Language. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Hintikka, J. & Sandu, G. 1997. Game-Theoretical Semantics. In: J. van Benthem & A. ter Meulen (eds.) Handbook of Logic and Language. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 361–410.
Janssen, T. 1997. Compositionality. In: J. van Benthem & A. ter Meulen (eds.) Handbook of Logic and Language. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 417–474.
Kamp, H. 1981. A Theory of Truth and Semantic Representation. In: J. Groenendijk & T. Janssen & M. Stokhof (eds.) Formal Methods in the Study of Language. Amsterdam: Mathematical Centre, 277–322. [Reprinted in: J. Groenendijk & T. Janssen & M. Stokhof (eds.) 1984. Truth, Interpretation and Information. Dordrecht: Foris, 1-41.]
Kamp, H. 1990. Comments on J. Groenendijk & M. Stokhof “Dynamic Predicate Logic”. In: J. van Benthem & H. Kamp (eds.) Partial and Dynamic Semantics. Vol. I. Center of Cognitive Science, University of Edinburgh.
Kamp, H. & Reyle, U. 1993. From Discourse to Logic. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Krahmer, E. 1995. Discourse and Presuppositon. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Tilburg.
Landman, F. 1986. Towards a Theory of Information. Ph.D. dissertation. Department of Philosophy, University of Amsterdam.
Ludlow, P. & Neale, S. 1991. Indefinite Descriptions: In Defense of Russell. Linguistics and Philosophy 14, 171–202.
Mclntyre, R. & Smith, D. 1982a. Husserl’s Identification of Meaning and Noema. In: H. Dreyfus & H. Hall (eds.) Husserl, Intentionality and Cognitive Science. Cambridge/MA: MIT Press, 81–92.
Mclntyre, R. & Smith, D. 1982b. Husserl and Intentionality: A Study of Mind, Meaning, and Language. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Muskens, R. & van Benthem, J. & Visser, A. 1997. Dynamics. In: J. van Benthem & A. ter Meulen (eds.) Handbook of Logic and Language. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 587–649.
Neale, S. 1993. Descriptions. Cambridge/MA: MIT Press.
Partee, B. & Hendriks, H. 1997. Montague Grammar. In: J. van Benthem & A. ter Meulen (eds.) Handbook of Logic and Language. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 5–92.
Peregrin, J. & von Heusinger, K. 1995. Dynamic Semantics with Choice Functions. In: U. Egli & K. von Heusinger (eds.). Choice Functions in Natural Language Semantics. Arbeitspapier 71. Fachgruppe Sprachwissenschaft, Universität Konstanz. [Also in: H. Kamp & B. Partee (eds.) 1997. Proceedings of the Workshop “Context Dependence in the Analysis of Linguistic Meaning ”. Vol. I: Papers. Institut für maschinelle Sprachverarbeitung, Universität Stuttgart, 329-353.]
Salmon, N. 1982. Reference and Essence. Oxford: Blackwell.
Searle, J. 1983. Intentionality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Veltman, F. 1996. Defaults in Update Semantics. Journal of Philosophical Logic 25, 221–261.
Vermeulen, K. 1994. Explorations of the Dynamic Environment. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Utrecht.
Westerståhl, D. 1984. Determiners and Context Sets. In: J. van Benthem & A. ter Meulen (eds.) Generalized Quantifiers in Natural Language. Dordrecht: Foris, 45–71.
Zeevat, H. 1992. Presupposition and Accommodation in Update Semantics. Journal of Semantics 9, 379–412.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Groenendijk, J., Stokhof, M. (2000). Meaning in Motion. In: von Heusinger, K., Egli, U. (eds) Reference and Anaphoric Relations. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, vol 72. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3947-2_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3947-2_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-0291-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-3947-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive