Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy ((SLAP,volume 72))

Abstract

The paper sketches the place of dynamic semantics within a broader picture of developments in philosophical and linguistic theories of meaning. Some basic concepts of dynamic semantics are illustrated by means of a detailed analysis of anaphoric definite and indefinite descriptions, which are treated as contextually dependent quantificational expressions. It is shown how a dynamic view sheds new light on the contextual nature of interpretation, on the difference between monologue and dialogue, and on the interplay between direct and indirect information.

A Dutch version of this paper, entitled ‘Betekenis in Beweging’, appeared in: Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte, 90-1, 1998, 26–53.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Beaver, D. 1995. Presupposition and Assertion in Dynamic Semantics. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaver, D. 1997. Presupposition. In: J. van Benthem & A. ter Meulen (eds.) Handbook of Logic and Language. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 939–1008.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chierchia, G. 1995. Dynamics of Meaning. Anaphora, Presupposition, and the Theory of Grammar. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekker, P. 1993. Existential Disclosure. Linguistics and Philosophy 16, 561–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dekker, P. 1997. On Context and Identity. In: H. Kamp & B. Partee (eds.) Proceedings of the Workshop “Context Dependence in the Analysis of Linguistic Meaning ”. Vol. I: Papers. Universität Stuttgart, Institut für maschinelle Sprach Verarbeitung, 87-115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dummett, M. 1993. Origins of Analytical Philosophy. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Eijck, J. 1993. The Dynamics of Description. Journal of Semantics 10, 239–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Føllesdal, D. 1982. Husserl’s Notion of Noema. In: H. Dreyfus & H. Hall (eds.) Husserl, Intentionality and Cognitive Science. Cambridge/MA: MIT Press, 73–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francez, N. & Berg, J. 1994. A Multi-Agent Extension of DRT. Technical Report LCL 94-99, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerbrandy, J. 1998. Bisimulations on Planet Kripke. Ph.D. dissertation. ILLC/Department of Philosophy, University of Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groenendijk, J. & Stokhof, M. 1990. Dynamic Montague Grammar. In: L. Káimán & L. Polos (eds.) Papers from the Second Symposium on Logic and Language. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó, 3–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groenendijk, J. & Stokhof, M. 1991. Dynamic Predicate Logic. Linguistics and Philosophy 14, 39–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groenendijk, J. & Stokhof, M. 1997. Questions. In: J. van Benthem & A. ter Meulen (eds.) Handbook of Logic and Language. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1055–1124.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Groenendijk, J. & Stokhof, M. & Veltman, F. 1995. Coreference and Contextually Restricted Quantification. Proceedings of the Fifth Conference on Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT 5), 112–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groenendijk, J. & Stokhof, M. & Veltman, F. 1996a. This Might Be It. In: J. Seligman & D. Westerståhl (eds.) Proceedings of the 1994 Moraga Workshop. Stanford/CA: CSLI Publications, 255–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groenendijk, J. & Stokhof, M. & Veltman, F. 1996b. Conference and Modality. In: S. Lappin (ed.). The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory. Oxford: Blackwell, 179–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groenendijk, J. & Stokhof, M. & Veltman, F. 1997. Coreference and Modality in Multi-Speaker Discourse. In: H. Kamp & B. Partee (eds.) Proceedings of the Workshop “Context Dependence in the Analysis of Linguistic Meaning ”. Vol. I: Papers. Universität Stuttgart, Institut für maschinelle Sprachverarbeitung, 195-217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groeneveld, W. 1995. Logical Investigations into Dynamic Semantics. Ph.D. dissertation. ILLC/Department of Philosophy, University of Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, I. 1982. The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Distributed by Ann Arbor: University Microfilms.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, I. 1983. File Change Semantics and the Familiarity Theory of Definiteness. In: R. Bäuerle & C. Schwarze & A. von Stechow (eds.) Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language. Berlin: de Gruyter, 164–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Heusinger, K. 1997. Definite Descriptions and Choice Functions. In: S. Akama (ed.). Logic, Language and Computation. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 61–91.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J. 1983. The Game of Language. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J. & Sandu, G. 1997. Game-Theoretical Semantics. In: J. van Benthem & A. ter Meulen (eds.) Handbook of Logic and Language. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 361–410.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, T. 1997. Compositionality. In: J. van Benthem & A. ter Meulen (eds.) Handbook of Logic and Language. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 417–474.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kamp, H. 1981. A Theory of Truth and Semantic Representation. In: J. Groenendijk & T. Janssen & M. Stokhof (eds.) Formal Methods in the Study of Language. Amsterdam: Mathematical Centre, 277–322. [Reprinted in: J. Groenendijk & T. Janssen & M. Stokhof (eds.) 1984. Truth, Interpretation and Information. Dordrecht: Foris, 1-41.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamp, H. 1990. Comments on J. Groenendijk & M. Stokhof “Dynamic Predicate Logic”. In: J. van Benthem & H. Kamp (eds.) Partial and Dynamic Semantics. Vol. I. Center of Cognitive Science, University of Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamp, H. & Reyle, U. 1993. From Discourse to Logic. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Krahmer, E. 1995. Discourse and Presuppositon. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Tilburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landman, F. 1986. Towards a Theory of Information. Ph.D. dissertation. Department of Philosophy, University of Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludlow, P. & Neale, S. 1991. Indefinite Descriptions: In Defense of Russell. Linguistics and Philosophy 14, 171–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mclntyre, R. & Smith, D. 1982a. Husserl’s Identification of Meaning and Noema. In: H. Dreyfus & H. Hall (eds.) Husserl, Intentionality and Cognitive Science. Cambridge/MA: MIT Press, 81–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mclntyre, R. & Smith, D. 1982b. Husserl and Intentionality: A Study of Mind, Meaning, and Language. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muskens, R. & van Benthem, J. & Visser, A. 1997. Dynamics. In: J. van Benthem & A. ter Meulen (eds.) Handbook of Logic and Language. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 587–649.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Neale, S. 1993. Descriptions. Cambridge/MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partee, B. & Hendriks, H. 1997. Montague Grammar. In: J. van Benthem & A. ter Meulen (eds.) Handbook of Logic and Language. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 5–92.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Peregrin, J. & von Heusinger, K. 1995. Dynamic Semantics with Choice Functions. In: U. Egli & K. von Heusinger (eds.). Choice Functions in Natural Language Semantics. Arbeitspapier 71. Fachgruppe Sprachwissenschaft, Universität Konstanz. [Also in: H. Kamp & B. Partee (eds.) 1997. Proceedings of the Workshop “Context Dependence in the Analysis of Linguistic Meaning ”. Vol. I: Papers. Institut für maschinelle Sprachverarbeitung, Universität Stuttgart, 329-353.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, N. 1982. Reference and Essence. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. 1983. Intentionality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veltman, F. 1996. Defaults in Update Semantics. Journal of Philosophical Logic 25, 221–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vermeulen, K. 1994. Explorations of the Dynamic Environment. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Utrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westerståhl, D. 1984. Determiners and Context Sets. In: J. van Benthem & A. ter Meulen (eds.) Generalized Quantifiers in Natural Language. Dordrecht: Foris, 45–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeevat, H. 1992. Presupposition and Accommodation in Update Semantics. Journal of Semantics 9, 379–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Groenendijk, J., Stokhof, M. (2000). Meaning in Motion. In: von Heusinger, K., Egli, U. (eds) Reference and Anaphoric Relations. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, vol 72. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3947-2_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3947-2_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-0291-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-3947-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics