Skip to main content

Competition Versus Competitive Equality in International Financial Markets

  • Chapter
Regulating International Financial Markets: Issues and Policies

Abstract

Competitive markets generally benefit consumers and usually benefit society in general. When markets are competitive, consumers tend to get the kinds and qualities of goods and services they want. These things are produced by firms and people according to their comparative advantages in production and distribution. Competitive markets are said to be “fair” to consumers because they, rather than some “higher” authority, determine what is produced—subject to the consumers’ ability to pay, competing demands by other consumers, and the costs of production and distribution. Such markets are considered “fair” to producers because those who succeed are better at meeting consumers’ demands than those who fail. Competitive markets tend to increase a nation’s wealth because they are efficient allocatively and productively. That is, resources are used such that they result in the greatest output that can be achieved with existing technology. This occurs because competitive producers gain from shifting purchasing, selling, and using resources to the point where all advantages from changes are achieved (returns are equated at the margin).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Benston, George J. 1990. The Separation of Commercial and Investment Banking: The Glass-Steagall Act Revisited and Reconsidered. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benston, George J., and Kaufman, George G. 1988. Risk and Solvency Regulation of Depository Institutions: Past Policies and Current Options. New York: Salomon Brothers Center for the Study of Financial Institutions, Graduate School of Business Administration, New York University, monograph 1988-1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benston, George J., Brumbaugh, R. Dan Jr., Guttentag, Jack M., Herring, Richard J., Kaufman, George G., Litan, Robert E., and Scott, Kenneth E. 1989. Blueprint for Restructuring America’s Financial Institutions. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, Eugene N. 1983. The Regulation and Reform of the American Banking System, 1900–1929. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Benston, G.J. (1992). Competition Versus Competitive Equality in International Financial Markets. In: Edwards, F.R., Patrick, H.T. (eds) Regulating International Financial Markets: Issues and Policies. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3880-2_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3880-2_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5727-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-3880-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics