Skip to main content
  • 81 Accesses

Abstract

[I]ndustrial management has been installed in the federal government… to control the nation’s largest… industrial enterprises… [as it]… combines peak economic, political, and military decision-making. Hitherto, the combination of powers in the same hands has been a feature of statist societies--communist, fascist, and others… [S. Melman, Pentagon Capitalism, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1970, p. 1].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. Some writers place the turning point in the first half of the nineteenth century; for example, see R. A. Solo, The Political Authority of the Market System, Cincinnati: Southwestern, 1974, pp. 45–64. Other scholars claim that it occurred at the turn of the twentieth century; for examples, see J. Weinstein, The Corporate Ideal in the Liberal State, Boston: Beacon, 1968, and R. H. Wiebe The Search for Order, New York: Hill and Wang, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A people’s convention in Rhode Island in 1842, representing a majority of the citizens, drafted a new constitution, held a referendum, and elected officials but the established minority government refused recognition. Thomas Wilson Dorr, a key leader of the reform, and the elected peoples’ governor, sought to establish himself in office. His “attack” was suppressed, and he was tried for treason and jailed. The Dorr War is used by many constitutional scholars as evidence that the courts began then to sustain the established power rather than the majority will of the people. See G. M. Dennison, The Dorr War, Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  3. The Fourteenth Amendment declares that states cannot deny the life, liberty, or property of any person without due process of law. Part of the debate as the wording of the amendment was being written centered on whether “citizen” or “person” should be used. The latter word was chosen, and it is a matter of historical record that “person” would hopefully include corporations, which had been considered as “artificial beings” in the eyes of the common law. See J. W. Hurst The Legitimacy of the Business, Corporation in the Law of the United Stater, 1780–1970, Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1970, pp. 64–69.

    Google Scholar 

  4. In this case (Santa Clara County V. Southern Pacific Railroad Co., 118 U.S. 394, 3%, 1886) the Supreme Court held that a corporation was a “person” under the Fourteenth Amendment.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A large number of books and articles have been published since the 1960s which investigate the structural changes in our economic system. The writings of Peter Drucker, Robert Heilbroner, and John Kenneth Galbraith contain popular as well as scholarly insights into this matter.

    Google Scholar 

  6. For one view see “The New Mercantilism: Hoarding Jobs, Business Week, March 31, 1973, P. 38.

    Google Scholar 

  7. C. ‘Night, America’s Emerging Fascist Economy, New Rochelle: Arlington, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  8. B. Nossiter, The Mytlunakers, Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1964, pp. 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  9. For an objective treatment of the economic arrangements under fascism, see W. G. Welk, Fascist Economic Policy, New York: Russell & Russell, 1968, pp. 23–39 and 134–179.

    Google Scholar 

  10. See (1) K. M. Dolbeare and P. Dolbeare, American Ideologies, Chicago: Rand McNally, 1973; and (2) L. T. Sargent, Contemporary Political Ideologies, Homewood: Dorsey, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  11. H. Finer, Mussolini’s Italy, Hamden: Archron, 1964, pp. 85–86 and 129–146.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. Weiss, The Fascist Tradition, New York: Harper & Row, 1967, pp. 2–6.

    Google Scholar 

  13. W. Ebenstein, Today’s Isms, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1970, pp. 121–122.

    Google Scholar 

  14. H. Kohn, “Fascism,” Encyclopedia Brittanica, Chicago: Encyclopedia Brittanica Corporation, 1960, pp. 104–106.

    Google Scholar 

  15. F. Neumann, Behemoth, New York: Harper & Row, 1963, pp. 163–16

    Google Scholar 

  16. M. Einaudi, “Fascism,” International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, New York: Macmillan, 1968, p. 337.

    Google Scholar 

  17. An excellent discussion of fascist economics in Nazi Germany can be found in A. Schweitzer, “Plans and Markets: Nazi Style,” Kyklos, Vol. 30, 1977, pp. 88–115.

    Google Scholar 

  18. An excellent discussion of the popularity of Hitler and Mussolini and the evolution of fascism in Germany and Italy, can be found in: G. Allardyce, The Place of Fascism in European History, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1971, pp. 2–12.

    Google Scholar 

  19. S. W. Halperin, Mussolini and Italian Fascism, Princeton: Van Nostrand, 1964, p. 162.

    Google Scholar 

  20. W. Ebenstein, op. cit., p. 132.

    Google Scholar 

  21. See R. Milibrand, The State in Capitalist Society, London: Quartet, 1973; and P. M. Sweezy, The Theory of Capitalist Development, New York: Monthly Review, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  22. F. Pollak, “Is National Socialism a New Order?” Studies in Philosophy and Social Science, 9 (1941), p. 223.

    Google Scholar 

  23. A. G. Rabinbach, ‘Toward a Marxist Theory of Fascism,“ New German Critique, Fall 1974, pp. 133–4.

    Google Scholar 

  24. H. A. Turner, Jr., “Fascism and Modernization,” World Politics, July 1972, p. 548.

    Google Scholar 

  25. D. Bell, The Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism, New York: Basic, 1976, p. 79.

    Google Scholar 

  26. W. Sauer, “Weimar Culture: Experiments in Modernization,” Social Research Summer 1972, pp. 281–283.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Twight, op cit.

    Google Scholar 

  28. W. Ebenstein, op. cit, p. 153.

    Google Scholar 

  29. E. Golob, The “Isms”, New York: Harpers, 1954, pp. 134–135 and 150–151.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Q. Hoare, “What is Fascism?” New Left Review, Vol. 20, 1963, p. 100.

    Google Scholar 

  31. The Communist, August 1933, p. 734.

    Google Scholar 

  32. R. P. Dutt, Fascism and Social Revolution, New York: International, 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  33. A. M. Schlesinger, Jr., The Politics of Upheaval, Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1960, pp. 263–290.

    Google Scholar 

  34. E. Golob, op. cit., pp. 134–135.

    Google Scholar 

  35. B. Bellush, The Failure of the NIRA, New York: Norton, 1975, p. 176.

    Google Scholar 

  36. B. M. Gross, “Friendly Fascism, A Model for America,” Social Policy, November/December 1970, pp. 44–45.

    Google Scholar 

  37. ¡bid, p. 46.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Ibid, p. 48.

    Google Scholar 

  39. D. R. Fusfeld, “The Rise of the Corporate State in America” Journal of Economic Issues, March 1972, p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Ibid, p. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  41. ¡bid, pp. 11 and 12.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Ibid, p. 18.

    Google Scholar 

  43. A. S. Miller, “Legal Foundations of the Corporate State,” Journal of Economic Issues,March 1972, pp. 60–61.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Ibid, p. 61.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Ibid., p. 61.

    Google Scholar 

  46. ¡bid, p. 67.

    Google Scholar 

  47. A. S. Miller, “The Rise of the Techno-Corporate State in America,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, January 1968, pp. 146–7.

    Google Scholar 

  48. A. S. Miller, “Legal Foundations…, op. cit., 68–71.

    Google Scholar 

  49. ¡bid, p. 76.

    Google Scholar 

  50. R. A. Cook, “April 20, 1989, Fascism Comes to the United States, Commonweal, January 2, 1976, pp. 11–19.

    Google Scholar 

  51. The Triage System was used in World War Ito classify wounded soldiers to determine which persons would be given medical aid. Only those needing aid and likely to recover with it were treated.

    Google Scholar 

  52. R. A. Cookop. ciL, pp. 13–14.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Ibid, p. 75.

    Google Scholar 

  54. T. Draper, “The Specter of Weimar Social Research, Summer 1972, pp. 325–332.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Ibid, p. 340.

    Google Scholar 

  56. A. Beichman, Nine Lies About America, New York: The Library Press, 1972, p. 41.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Ibid., p. 38.

    Google Scholar 

  58. M. D. Reagan, The Managed Economy, New York: Oxford University Press, 1963, pp. 236–7.

    Google Scholar 

  59. A. Wolfe, “Waiting for Right: A Critique of the ‘Fascism’ Hypothesis, The Review of Radical Political Economics, Fall 1973, p. 47.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Ibid., p. 52.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Ibid, p. 47.

    Google Scholar 

  62. H. Morgenthau, “Remarks on the Validity of Historical Analogies” Social Research, Summer 1972, p. 364.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Peterson, R.D. (1991). Fascism. In: Political Economy and American Capitalism. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3874-1_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3874-1_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5724-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-3874-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics