Skip to main content

A Combined Anatomical and Biomechanical Approach to the Sacro-Iliac Joints

  • Chapter
Interfaces in Medicine and Mechanics—2

Abstract

The amount of friction between the articular surfaces of the sacro-iliac joints (SI-joints) was determined and related to the degree of macroscopical roughening. Results show that articular surfaces with both coarse texture and ridges and depressions have high friction coefficients. The influence of ridges and depressions appears to be of greater influence than coarse texture. The data are compatible with the view that roughening of the SI-joint concerns a physiological process.

Movement in the SI-joints was measured in preparation of embalmed cadavers of elder humans and correlated with a radiographic survey. The pelvis was fixed at the fifth lumbar vertebra. The connections between sacrum and fifth lumbar vertebra were spared, as were the surrounding ligaments. To induce movement, forces were directed at the acetabula.

In the sagittal plane both ventral rotation (as part of nutation) and dorsal rotation (as part of contranutation) could be demonstrated. Most SI-joints were mobile, allowing — for the combination of nutation and contranutation — total rotation of up to 4°. Larger rotation can be expected in young people. The SI-joint with the lowest mobility showed radiographically marked arthrosis. The importance of intra-individual differences is emphasized.

Based on studies of embalmed specimens, the sacrotuberous ligaments are considered to be important structures in the kinematic chain between the pelvis and vertebral column. Muscles attached to these ligaments, such as the gluteus maximus, and in some individuals the piriformis and long head of the biceps femoris, may influence movement in the SI-joints. The effect of load application to the sacrotuberous ligament was studied on rotation in the SI-joint. It was shown that load application along the direction of hamstrings and gluteus maximus muscles significantly diminished ventral rotation of the sacrum. The results imply that loading the sacrotuberous ligament restricts nutation of the sacrum. Consequently, muscles attached to the sacrotuberous ligaments, such as gluteus maximus, and in certain individuals the long head of the biceps, can dynamically influence movement and stability of the SI-joints.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Hippocrates, 460-377 B.C., acc. to Lynch.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Vaesalius, A., De corpori humanis fabrica. Oporini, Basel, 1543.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Paré, A., The works of generation of man. Cotes and Young, London, 1634. Translation T. Johnson.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Diemerbroek, I., The anatomy of human bodies. Brewster, London, 1689. Translation W. Salmon.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Albinus, 1697-1770, acc. to Lynch.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Von Luschka, 1864, acc. to Solonen.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zaglas, 1851, acc. to Weisl.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Duncan, J.M., The behaviour of the pelvic articulations in the mechanism of parturition. Dublin Quart. J. Med. Sci., 1854, 18, 60–69.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bakland, O. and Hansen, J.H., The “axial sacroiliac joint”. Anat. Clin., 1984, 6, 29–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Meyer, C.H., Der Mechanisms der Symphysis sacroiliaca. Arch. Anat. U. Phvsiol. 1878, 1, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Klein, G., Zur biomechaniek der Iliosacralgelenkes. Ztschr. Geburtsch und Gynak. 1891, 21, 74–118.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Testut, L. et Latarjet, A., Traité d’Anatomie Humaine. G. Doine et Cie., Paris, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ehara, S. El Khoury, G.Y. and Bergman, R.A., The accessory sacroiliac joint: A common anatomic variant. A.J.R. 1988, 150, 857–859.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Faraboeuf, L.H., Sur l’anatomie et la physiologie des articulations sacro-iliaques avant et après la symphysectomie. Ann. Gynecol. Obstet. 1894, 41, 407–420.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Strasser, H., Lehrbuch der Muskeln und Gelenkmechanik. Springer, Berlin, 1913.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fick, 1911, acc. to Solonen.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Palfrey, A., The shape of the sacroiliac joint surface. J. Anat., 1981, 132, 457.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Weisl, H., The articular surfaces of the sacroiliac joint and their relation to the movements of the sacrum. Acta Anat. 1954, 22, 1–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Brooke, R., The sacro-iliac joint. J. Anat. 1924, 58, 299–305.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Schuncke, G.B., The anatomy and development of the sacroiliac joint in man. Anat. Rec., 1938, 72, 313–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Solonen, K.A., The sacroiliac joint in the light of anatomical, roentgenological and clinical studies. Acta Orthoped. Scand. 1957, (suppl.) 27, 1–127.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Fischer, L.P., Gonon, G.P., Carret, J.P. et Dimmet, J., Biomécanique articulaire. Ass. Corp. et Med. Tome 2, Lyon, 1976, pp. 33–36.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bonnaire, E. et Bué, V., Influence de la position sur la forme et les dimensions du bassin. Ann. Gynecol. Obstet., 1899, 52, 296.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hisaw, F.L., The influence of the ovary on the resorption of the pubic bones. J. Exper. Zool., 1925, 23, 661.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Chamberlain, W.E., The symphysis pubis in the roentgen examination of the sacro-iliac joint. Am. J. Roentgenol. 1930, 24, 621–625.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Heyman, J. and Lundqvist, A., The symphysis pubis in pregnancy and parturition. Acta Obstet, and Gynecol. Scand. 1932, 12, 191–197.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Abramson, D., Roberts, S.M. and Wilson, P.D., Relaxation of the pelvic joints in pregnancy. Surg. Gynecol, and Obstet., 1934, 58, 595–613.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Abramson, D., Hurwitt, E. and Lesnick, G., Relaxin in human serum as a test of pregnancy. Surg. Gynecol, and Obstet., 1937, 65, 355.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Thorp, D.J. and Fray, W.E., The pelvic joints during pregnancy and labour. J.A.M.A., 1938, 111, 1162–1166.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Borell, U. and Fernstrom, I., The movements at the sacroiliac joints and their importance to changes in the pelvic dimensions during parturition. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 1957, 36, 42–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Walheim, G.G., Olerud, S. and Ribbe, T., Mobility of the pubic symphysis. Acta Orthop. Scand. 1984, 55, 203–208.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Walheim, G.G. Stabilization of the pelvis with the Hoffmann frame. Acta Orthop. Scand. 1984, 55, 319–324.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Snijders, C.J., Snijder J.G.N. and Hoedt, H.T.E. Biomechanische modellen in het bestek van rugklachten tijdens zwangerschap. Tijdschr. voor Soc. Gen. en Gez. Zorg. 1984, 62, 141–147.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lynch, F.W., The pelvic articulations during pregnancy, labour and Puerperium: An X-ray study. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet. 1920, 30, 575–580.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Jackson, R.H., Chronic sacroiliac strain with attendent sciatica. Am. J. Surg., 1934, 24, 456–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Haggart, G.E., Sciatic pain of unknown origin: An effective method of treatment. J. Bone and Joint Surg., 1938, 20, 851–856.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Cazeviel, 1973, acc. to Solonen.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Stewart, T.D., Pathologic changes in aging sacroiliac joints. Clin. Orthop, and Rel. Res., 1984, 183, 188–196.

    Google Scholar 

  39. McCarty, D.J., Arthritis and Allied Conditions. Lea Febiger, Philadelphia, 1979, 9th edition.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Braune, C.W. und Fischer, O., Bestimmung der Trägheitsmomente des menschlichen Körpers und seine Glieder. Abhandl. math. phvs. kl. Sächs. Ges. Wiss. 1892, 18, 409.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Tischauer, E.R., Miller, M. and Nathan, I.M., Lordosimetry: A new technique for the measurement of postural response to materials handling. Amer. J. Indust. Hvg. Ass. 1973, 1, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Bellamy, N., Park, W. and Rooney, J.R., What do we know about the sacroiliac joint? Sem. in Arth. and Rheum., 1983, 12, 282–313.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Derry, D.E., The influence of sex on the position and composition of the human sacrum. J. Anat. Physiol., 1912, 46, 184–192.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Sashin, D., A critical analysis of the anatomy and the pathological changes of the sacroiliac joints. J. Bone and Joint Surg., 1930, 12, 891–910.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Bowen, V. and Cassidy, J.D., Macroscopic and microscopic anatomy of the sacroiliac joints from embryonic life until the eight decade. Spine, 1981, 6, 620–628.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Paquin, J.D., Van der Rest, M., Marie, P.J., Mort, J.S., Pidoux, I., Poole, A.R. and Roughley, P.J., Biochemical and morphologic studies of cartilage from the adult human sacro-iliac joint. Arthritis and Rheumatism. 1983, 26, 887–894.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Dijkstra, P.J., Vleeming, A. and Stoeckart, R., Complex motion tomography of the sacro-iliac joint. RöFo. 1989, 105, 635–642.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Vleeming, A., Stoeckart, R. and Snijders, C.J., The sacrotuberous ligament: A conceptual approach to its dynamic role in stabilizing the sacro-iliac joint. Clin. Biomech. 1989, 4, 201–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Vleeming, A., Van Wingerden, J.P., Snijders, C.J., Stoeckart, R. and Stijnen, T., Load application to the sacrotuberous ligament: Influences on sacro-iliac joint mechanics. Clin. Biomech. 1989, 4, 204–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Vleeming, A., Stoeckart, R., Volkers, A.C.W, and Snijders, C.J. Relation between form and function in the sacro-iliac joint, part 1: Clinical anatomical aspects. Spine. 1990, 15, 130–132.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Vleeming, A., Volkers, A.C.W., Snijders, C.J. and Stoeckart, R. Relation between form and function in the sacro-iliac joint, part 2: Biomechanical aspects. Spine. 1990, 15, 133–135.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Elsevier Science Publishers Ltd

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vleeming, A., Stoeckart, R., Snijders, C.J., Van Wingerden, J.P. (1991). A Combined Anatomical and Biomechanical Approach to the Sacro-Iliac Joints. In: Williams, K.R., Toni, A., Middleton, J., Pallotti, G. (eds) Interfaces in Medicine and Mechanics—2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3852-9_39

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3852-9_39

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-85166-583-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-3852-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics