Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Debondihg

  • Chapter
Interfaces in Medicine and Mechanics—2

  • 175 Accesses

Abstract

This paper gives an extensive review of factors which may influence the location of the weak link in the bonding/debonding chain. The engineering principles of finite element stress analysis have been applied to three different methods of orthodontic bracket removal. This method identifies the area of maximum principal stress which is the likely location for the initiation of the crack within the enamel/composite/ complex.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Nordenvall, K.J., Brannstrom, M. and Malmgren, O., Etching of deciduous teeth and young and old permanent teeth. A comparison between 15 and 60 seconds of etching. Am. J. Orthod., 1980, 78, 99–108.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Oliver, R.G., The effects of differing etch times on the etch pattern on enamel of unerupted and erupted human teeth examined using the scanning electron microscope. Br. J. Orthod., 1987, 14, 105–107.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Oliver, R.G., The effects of differing acid concentrations, techniques and etch time on the etch pattern of enamel of erupted and unerupted human teeth examined using the scanning electron microscope. Br. J. Orthod., 1988, 15, 45–49.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Jacobs, G., Kuftinec, M.M., Showfety, K.J., Fraunhofer, J.A. von., Bonding characteristics of impacted versus erupted permanent teeth. Am. J. Orthod., 1986, 89, 242–245.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Oliver, R.G., Bond strength of orthodontic attachments to enamel from unerupted and erupted young permanent teeth. Eur. J. Orthod., 1986, 8, 123–126.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Artun, J., Bergland, S., Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid etch enamel pre-treatment. Am. J. Orthod., 1984, 85, 333–340.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lehman, R., Davidson, C.L., Loss of surface enamel after acid etching procedures and its relation to fluoride content. Am. J. Orthod., 1981, 80, 73–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Brannstrom, M., Nordenvall, K.J., Malmgren, O., The effects of various pre-treatment methods of the enamel in bonding procedures. Am. J. Orthod., 1978, 74, 522–530.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bryant, S., Retief, D.H., Bradley, E.L., Denys, F.R., The effect of topical fluoride treatment on enamel fluoride uptake and the tensile bond strength of an orthodontic bonding resin. Am. J. Orthod., 1985, 74, 294–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hirce, J.D., Sather, A.H., Chao, E.Y.S., The effect of topical fluorides, after acid etching of enamel, on the bond strength of directly bonded orthodontic brackets. Am. J. Orthod., 1980, 78, 444–452.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Thornton, J.B., Retief, D.H., Bradley, E.L., Denys, F.R., The effect of fluoride in phosphoric acid on enamel fluoride uptake and the tensile bond strength of an orthodontic bonding resin. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop., 1986, 90, 91–101.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wright, F.A.C., Beck, D.J., Prevention of pit and fissure caries III. Fluoride and resin-enamel bonding. New Zealand Dent. J., 1973, 69, 267–272.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Grajower, R., Glick, A., Gedalia, I., Kochavi, D., Tensile strength of the bond between resin to enamel etched with phosphoric acid containing fluoride. J. Oral Rehabil., 1979, 69, 267–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chumak, L., Galil, K.A., Way, D.C., Johnson, L., Hunter, W.S., An in vitro investigation of lingual bonding. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop., 1989, 95, 20–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Denys, F.R., Retief, D.H., Variations in enamel etching patterns produced by different concentrations phosphoric acid. J. Dent. Assoc. South Africa, 1982, 37, 185–189.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Soetopo, Beech, D.R., Hardwick, J.L., Mechanism of adhesion of polymers to acid-etched enamel. Effect of acid concentration and washing on bond strength. J. Oral Rehabil., 1978, 5, 69–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gottlieb, E.W., Retief, D.H., Jamison, H.C., An optimal concentration of phosphoric acid as an etching agent, Part 1 Tensile bond strength studies. J. Pros. Dent., 1982, 48, 48–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Manson-Rahemtulla, B., Retief, D.H., Jamison, H.C., Effect of concentrations of phosphoric acid on enamel dissolution. J. Pros. Dent., 1984, 51, 495–498.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bryant, S., Retief, D.H., Russell, C.M., Denys, F.R., Tensile bond strengths of orthodontic bonding resins and attachments to etched enamel. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop., 1987, 92, 225–231.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Brannstrom, M., Malmgren, O., Nordenvall, K.J., Etching of young permanent teeth with an acid gel. Am. J. Orthod., 1982, 82, 379–383.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Gwinnett, A.J., The potential weak link in the bonding chain. New York State Dent. J., 1983, 49, 392–395.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sheykholeslam, Z., Brandt, S., Some factors affecting the bonding of orthodontic attachments to tooth surface. J. Clin. Orthod., 1977, 11, 734–743.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Mardaga, W.J., Shannon, I.L., Decreasing the depth of etch for direct bonding in orthodontics. J. Clin. Orthod., 1982, 16, 130–132.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Barkmeier, W.W., Gwinnett, A.J., Shaffer, S.E., Effects of enamel etching time on bond strength and morphology. J. Clin. Orthod., 1985, 19, 36–38.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Barkmeier, W.W., Gwinnett, A.J., Shaffer, S.E., Effects of reduced acid concentration and etching time on bond strength and enamel morphology. J. Clin. Orthod., 1987, 21, 395–398.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Carstensen, W., Clinical results after direct bonding of brackets using shorter etching times. Am. J. Orthod., 1986, 89, 70–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kinch, A.P., Taylor, H., Warltier, R., Oliver, R.G., Newcombe, R.G., A clinical trial comparing the failure rates of directly bonded brackets using etch times of 15 or 60 seconds. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop., 1988, 94, 476–483.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kinch, A.P., Taylor, H., Warltier, R., Oliver, R.G., Newcombe, R.G., A clinical study of amount of adhesive remaining on enamel after debonding, comparing etch times of 15 and 60 seconds. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop., 1989, 95, 415–421.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Tyler, J.E., A scanning electron microscope study of factors influencing etch patterns of human enamel. Arch. Oral Biol., 1976, 21, 765–769.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Hormati, A.A., Fuller, J.L., Denehy, G.E., Effects of contamination and mechanical distrubance on the quality of acid-etched enamel. J. Am. Dent. Assoc, 1980, 100, 34–38.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Bates, D., Retief, D.H., Jamison, H.C., Denys, F.R., Effects of acid etch parameters on enamel topography and composite-resin-enamel bond strength. Paediatric Dentistry, 1982, 4, 106–110.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Williams, B., Fraunhofer, J.A. von., The influence of the time of etching and washing on the bond strength of fissure sealants applied to enamel. J. Oral Rehabil., 1977, 4, 139–143.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Gwinnett, A.J., Bonding of restorative resins to enamel. International Dent. J., 1988, 38, 91–96.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Thomson, J.L., Main, C., Gillespie, F.C., Stephen, K.W., The effect of salivary contamination on fissure sealant-enamel bond strength. J. Oral Rehabil., 1981, 8, 11–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Zachrissen, B.U., A post-treatment evaluation of direct bonding in orthodontics. Am. J. Orthod., 1977, 71, 173–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Retief, D.H., Woods, E., Is a low viscosity bonding resin necessary? J. Oral Rehabil., 1981, 8, 255–266.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Jassem, H.A., Retief, D.H., Jamison, H.C., Tensile and shear strengths of bonded and rebonded orthodontic attachments. Am. J. Orthod., 1981, 79, 661–668.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. McCabe, J.F., Storer, R., Adaptation of resin restorative materials to etched enamel and the interfacial work of fracture. Br. Dent. J., 1980, 148, 155–159.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Asmussen, E., Clinical relevance of physical chemical and bonding properties of composite resins. Operative Dent., 1985, 10, 61–73.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Faust, J.B., Grego, G.N., Fan, P.L., Powers, J.M., Penetration coefficient, tensile strength, and bond strength of thirteen direct bonding orthodontic cements. Am. J. Orthod., 1978, 73, 512–525.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Jergensen, K.D., Shimokobe, H., Adaptation of resinous restorative materials to acid etched enamel surfaces. Scand. J. Dent. Res., 1975, 83, 31–36.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Moin, K., Dogon, I.L., An evaluation of shear strength measurements of unfilled and filled resin combinations. Am. J. Orthod., 1978, 74, 531–536.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Delport, A., Grobler, S.R., A laboratory evaluation of the tensile bond strength of some orthodontic bonding resins to enamel. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop., 1988, 93, 133–137.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Pender, N., Dresner, D., Wilson, S., Vowles, R., Shear strength of orthodontic bonding agents. Eur. J. Orthod., 1988, 10, 374–379.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Wright, W.L., Powers, J.M., In vitro tensile bond strength of reconditioned brackets. Am. J. Orthod., 1985, 87, 247–252.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Rezich, P.M., Panneton, M.J., Barkmeier, W.W., In vitro evaluation of fluoride and non-fluoride releasing orthodontic adhesives on bracket bond strength. J. Dent. Res., 1988, Abstract No. 1594, p. 312.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Eden, G.T., Craig, R.G., Peyton, F.A., Evaluation of a tensile test for direct filling resins. J. Dent. Res., 1970, 49, 428–434.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Schechter, G., Caputo, A.A., Chaconas, S.J., The effect of adhesive thickness on retention of direct bonded brackets. J. Dent. Res., 1980, 59, 285, Abstract 72.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Evans, L.B., Powers, J.M., Factors affecting in vitro bond strength of no-mix orthodontic cements. Am. J. Orthod., 1985, 87, 508–512.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Perry, A.C., Rebonding brackets. J. Clin. Orthod., 1980, 14, 850–854.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Rosenstein, P., Binder, R.E., Bonding and rebonding peel testing of orthodontic brackets. Clin. Prev. Dent., 1980, 2, 15–17.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Dickinson, P.T., Powers, J.M., Evaluation of fourteen direct bonding orthodontic bases. Am. J. Orthod., 1980, 78, 630–639.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Thanos, C.E., Munholland, T., Caputo, A.A., Adhesion of mesh-base direct-bonding brackets. Am. J. Orthod., 1979, 75, 421–430.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Lopez, J.I., Retentive shear strengths of various bonding attachment bases. Am. J. Orthod., 1980, 77, 669–678.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Ferguson, J.W., Read, M.J.F., Watts, D.C., Bond strengths of an integral bracket-base combination: an in vitro study. Eur. J. Orthod., 1984, 6, 267–276.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Maijer, R., Smith, D.C., Variables influencing the bond strength of metal orthodontic bracket bases. Am. J. Orthod., 1981, 79, 20–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Hanson, G.H., Gibbon, W.M., Shimizu, H., Bonding bases coated with porous metal powder: a comparison with foil mesh. Am. J. Orthod., 1983, 83, 1–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Siomka, L.V, Powers, J.M., In vitro bond strength of treated direct-bonding metal bases. Am. J. Orthod., 1985, 88, 133–136.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Peutzfeldt, A., Asmussen, E., Silicoating: evaluation of a new method of bonding composite resin to metal. Scand. J. Dent. Res., 1988, 96, 171–176.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Mascia, V.E., Chen, S-R., Shearing strengths of recycled direct-bonding brackets. Am. J. Orthod., 1982, 82, 133–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Wheeler, J.J., Ackerman, R.J., Bond strength of thermally recycled metal brackets. Am. J. Orthod., 1983, 83, 181–186.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Gwinnett, A.J., Gorelick, L., Microscopic evaluation of enamel after debonding: clinical application. Am. J. Orthod., 1977, 71, 651–665.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Lovius, B.B.J., Pender, N., Hewage, S., O’Dowling, I., Tomkins, A., A clinical trial of a light activated bonding material over an 18 month period. Br. J. Orthod., 1987, 14, 11–20.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Oliver, R.G., The effect of different methods of bracket removal on the amount of residual adhesive. Am. J. Orthod. Pentofac. Orthop., 1988, 93, 196–200.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Buzzitta, V.AJ., Hallgren, S.E., Powers, J.M., Bond strength of orthodontic direct-bonding cement-bracket systems as studied in vitro. Am. J. Orthod., 1982, 81, 87–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Sheridan, J.J., Brawlty, G., Hastings, J., Electro-thermal debracketing. Part 1. An in vitro study. Am. J. Orthod., 1986, 89, 21–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Zidan, O., Asmussen, E., Jergensen, K.D., Micro-scopical analysis of fractured restorative resin/etched enamel bonds. Scand. J. Dent. Res., 1982, 90, 286–291.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Bennett, C.G., Shen, C., Waldron, J.M., The effects of debonding on the enamel surface. J. Clin. Orthod., 1984, 18, 330–334.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Mulville, D.R., Vaishnav, R.N., Interfacial crack propogation. J. Adhesion, 1975, 7, 215–233.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Williams, K.R., Edmundson, J.T., Orthodontic tooth movement analysed by the finite element method. Biomaterials, 1984, 5, 347–352.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Williams, K.R., Edmundson, J.T., Morgan, G., Jones, M.L., Richmond, S., Orthodontic movement of a canine into an adjoining extraction site. J. Biomed. Eng., 1986, 8, 115–120.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Tanne, K., Sakuda, M., Burstone, C.J., Three dimensional finite element analysis for stress in the periodontal tissue by orthodontic forces. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop., 1987, 92, 499–505.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Desai, C.S, Abel, J.F., An introduction to the finite element method. Van Nostrand-Reinhold, New York, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Hinton, E., Owen, D.R.J., An introduction to finite element computations. Pineridge Press Ltd., Swansea, U.K., 1979.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Child Dental Health, Dental School, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF4 4XY, UK

    R. G. Oliver M.Sc.D., F.D.S. (Senior Lecturer/Consultant)

  2. Department of Basic Dental Science, Dental School, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF4 4XY, UK

    K. R. Williams B.Sc., Ph.D. (Senoir Lecturer)

Authors
  1. R. G. Oliver M.Sc.D., F.D.S.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. K. R. Williams B.Sc., Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Basic Dental Science, University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff, UK

    K. R. Williams

  2. Orthopaedic Clinic, University of Bologna, Italy

    A. Toni

  3. Department of Civil Engineering, University College of Swansea, UK

    J. Middleton

  4. University of Bologna, Italy

    G. Pallotti

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Elsevier Science Publishers Ltd

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Oliver, R.G., Williams, K.R. (1991). Debondihg. In: Williams, K.R., Toni, A., Middleton, J., Pallotti, G. (eds) Interfaces in Medicine and Mechanics—2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3852-9_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3852-9_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-85166-583-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-3852-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation