Advertisement

A PC Simulation Program for Comparing Performances of Robot Control Algorithms

  • J. O’Shea
  • R. Benali
Chapter
  • 117 Downloads
Part of the Microprocessor-Based Systems Engineering book series (ISCA, volume 6)

Abstract

In order to compare the performances of robot control algorithms, a benchmark test, based on the Puma 560 tracing straight line trajectories, is proposed. For simulating that test with a personal computer, subroutines of a program written in Pascal are described and their listings are supplied. Tests of some robot control algorithms serve as examples.

Keywords

Control Algorithm Inverse Kinematic Joint Position Joint Velocity Robot Controller 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Anonymous (1986), CATIA User’s Manual — Robotics Module, Dassault Systems, Suresnes France.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Walker H.W. and Orin D.E. (1982), “Efficient Dynamic Computer Simulation of Robotic Mechanisms”, ASME Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control, 205–211.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Neuman C.P. and Murray J.J. (1987), “The Complete Dynamic Model and Customized Algorithms of the Puma Robot”, IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man, cybernetics, vol. SMC-17,no. 4, 635–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Fu K.S., Gonzalez R.C. and Lee C.S.G. (1987), Robotics: Control, Sensing, Vision and Intelligence, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Koivo, A.J. (1989), Fundamentals for Control of Robotic Manipulators, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Paul R.P. (1981), Robot Manipulator: Mathematics, Programming, and Control, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Tarn T.J., Bejczy A.K., Han S. and Yum X. (1985), “Inertia Parameters of Puma 560 Robot Arm”, Robotics Laboratory Report SSM-RL-85-02, Saint-Louis.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    O’Shea J. and Turgeon, A.B. (1988), “Benefits of Positive Current-Feedback Inner Loop for Robot Servos”, IFAC Proceedings on “Theory of Robots”, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 185–191.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    O’Shea J., Benali R. and Turgeon A.B. (1990), “An Improved Robot Controller Based on Positive Current Feedback Plus PID”, IMACS Proceedings of MIM-S2’ 90, Brussels.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Chaudet R. and O’Shea J. (1983), “Validation of an Adaptive Robot Control Structure by Means of Simulation”, IMACS Proceedings on “Simulation in Engineering Sciences”, Elsevier Pub., 411–416.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Gorez R. and O’Shea J. (1989), “Robot Positionning Control: Survey and Comparative Analysis”, Proceedings Incarf 89: 4th Int. Conf. on CAD, CAM, Robotics and Factories of the Future, vol. 1, New-Delhi, 639–648.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. O’Shea
    • 1
  • R. Benali
    • 1
  1. 1.Ecole Polytechnique de MontréalMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations