Skip to main content

Initial Spacing: How Many Trees To Plant

  • Chapter
Forest Regeneration Manual

Part of the book series: Forestry Sciences ((FOSC,volume 36))

Abstract

The best initial spacing at which to plant the southern pines is primarily a function of the product desired and is based on both biological and operational factors. Long-term spacing studies over a wide range of initial densities and tree species demonstrate that for rotations beyond approximately 20 years, initial density has little effect on total net wood yield. However, it has a pronounced effect on product size and distribution, value, cost and on harvesting and cultural treatments. Planting seedlings on 2.4 × 2.4 to 3.0 × 3.0 m or equivalent spacing provides good flexibility for plantation management under most landowner objectives and current market conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arnold, L. E. 1981. Gross yields of rough wood products from a 31-year-old loblolly and shortleaf pine spacing study. Dep. of Forest Resources. Univ. of Illinois. Rep. 81–1.4 p.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bowling, D. 1987. Twenty-year slash pine spacing study: what to optimize. Pages 300–304 In Proc. of the 4th Biennial Southern Silvicultural Research Conference. Nov. 4–6, Atlanta, Ga.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Buford, M. A. 1990. Performance of several yield models for predicting stand dynamics of a 30-year-old Loblolly pine spacing study. Forest Ecol. Manage, (in review).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Burrows, J. O., W. D. Greene, R. L. Lanford, and R. A. Tufts. 1986. Auburn harvesting analyzer. School of Forestry, Auburn Univ., Auburn, Ala.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Feduccia, D. P. 1980. Effect of site, initial spacing, and thinning intensity on growth of planted loblolly pine. U.S.D.A. Forest Serv., South. Forest Exp. Sta., Alexandria, La. Progress rep.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Godman, R. M, and J. H. Cooley. 1970. Effect of initial spacing on jack pine growth and yield. Michigan Acad. 2(4):107–111.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hafley, W. L., and W. D. Smith. 1990. Unpublished data, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jones, E. P. 1987. Slash pine plantation spacing study — age 30. Pages 45–49 In Proc. of the 4th Biennial Southern Silvicultural Research Conference. Nov. 4–6, Atlanta, Ga.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Larsen, P. R. 1962. A biological approach to wood quality. Tappi 45:6,443–448.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lloyd, F. T., and E. P. Jones. 1983. Density effects on height growth and its implications for site index prediction and growth projections. Pages 329–333 In Proc. the 2nd Biennial Southern Silvicultural Research Conference. Nov. 4–5, Atlanta, Ga.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Megraw, R. A. 1985. Wood Quality Factors in Loblolly Pine. Tappi Press, Atlanta, Ga. 88 p.

    Google Scholar 

  12. 0utcalt, K. W. 1986. Stand density affects growth of Choctawhatchee sand pine. South. J. Appl. Forestry 10:128–131.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Smalley, G. W. 1985. Growth of 20-year-old Virginia pine planted at three spacings in Tennessee. South. J. Appl. Forestry 9:32–37.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Smith, D. M. 1986. The Practice of Silviculture. 8th ed. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York. 527 p.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Society of American Foresters. 1961. Forestry Handbook. The Ronald Press Co., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sprinz, P., T. R. Clason, and D. R. Bower. 1979. Spacing and thinning effects on the growth and development of a loblolly pine plantation. Pages 1–42 In Forestry Research Report 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Straka, T. J., and W. F. Watson. 1987. Costs of forestry practices. Forest Farmer Manual 26:16–22.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Watson, W. F., G. H. Taylor, G. H. Weaver, and R.K. Matthes. 1985. Impact of feller bunchers and plantation spacing on thinning. South. J. Appl. Forestry 9:117–120.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Smith, W.D., Strub, M.R. (1991). Initial Spacing: How Many Trees To Plant. In: Duryea, M.L., Dougherty, P.M. (eds) Forest Regeneration Manual. Forestry Sciences, vol 36. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3800-0_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3800-0_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-0960-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-3800-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics