Skip to main content

Application of indicator dilution principles to regional assessment of coronary flow reserve from digital angiography

  • Chapter
Quantitative Coronary Arteriography

Part of the book series: Developments in Cardiovascular Medicine ((DICM,volume 117))

Summary

Although cineangiography is widely utilized to assess the severity of coronary artery disease, conventional arteriography exhibits intra- and interobserver variability and provides no information regarding flow characteristics. We have investigated application of indicator-dilution principles to computer analysis of digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as a means to calculate coronary flow reserve (CFR). Using a background-corrected epicardial coronary region of interest, CFR is directly proportional to the ratio of the quantity of contrast administered under hyperemic and basal conditions, and inversely proportional to the area under the contrast time curve. Utilizing this indicator-dilution algorithm, normal canine coronaries exhibit a CFR ratio exceeding 4:1. In the presence of artificially induced stenoses, we compared the indicator-dilution method to surgically implanted electromagnetic flow (EMF) probes and found a good correlation between DSA and EMF, CFR, r = 0.86.

Initial studies utilized a single frame per cardiac cycle which provided inadequate temporal resolution for slow heart rates. The method was subsequently modified to utilize 30 frames per second ECG-gated DSA and hand injection of contrast. A separate validation study showed close correlation in the animal model between CFR measured by DSA and EMF probe, r = 0.86. We subsequently investigated this method in 21 patients (35 vessels). Normal CFR in seven patients without stenoses was 4.8:1 ± 0.65. Patients with unstable angina had much lower flow reserve averaging 1.7 ± 0.3. Angioplasty generally improved CFR. We have recently applied the indicator-dilution method to calculation of absolute coronary blood flow (CBF), in an animal model. In this application, we used paired injections of contrast, one in the left ventricle (30 to 40 ml) and a second subselectively in the coronary. By comparing the area under these two epicardial contrast intensity curves, the proportion of cardiac output perfusing the coronary could be calculated. CBF was calculated by measuring total cardiac output using a thermodilution catheter. A close correlation between EMF and DSA was confirmed, r = 0.89.

These data indicate that an indicator-dilution model can be applied to contrast injection in the coronary arteries and CFR or CBF can be calculated accurately in both an animal model and in a patient population. Further investigations will be required to determine the clinical utility of these findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arnett EN, Isner JM, Redwood DR, Kent KM, Baker WP, Ackerstein H, Roberts WD: Coronary artery narrowing in coronary heart disease: comparison of cineangiographic and necropsy findings. Ann Intern Med 91: 350–356, 1979.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gray CR, Hoffman HA, Hammond WS, Miller KL, Oseasohn RO: Correlation of arteriographic and pathologic findings in the coronary arteries in man. Circulation 26: 494–499, 1962.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Grondin CM, Dyrda I, Pasternac A, Campeau L, Bourassa MG, Lesperance J: Discrepancies between cineangiographic and post-mortem findings in patients with coronary artery disease and recent myocardial revascularization. Circulation 49: 703–708, 1974.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Levin DC, Baltaxe HA, Sos TA: Potential sources of error in coronary arteriography. II. In interpretation of the study. Am J Roentgenol 124: 386–393, 1975.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Zir LM, Miller SW, Dinsmore RE, Gilbert JP, Hawthorne JW: Interobserver variability in coronary angiography. Circulation 53: 627–632, 1976.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gould KL, Lipscome K: Effects of coronary stenoses on coronary flow reserve and resistance. Am J Cardiol 34: 48–55, 1974.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. White CW, Wright CB, Doty DB, Hiratza LF, Eastham CL, Harrison DG, Marcus ML: Does visual interpretation of the coronary arteriogram predict the physiologic importance of a coronary stenosis? N Engl J Med 310: 819–824, 1984.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gould KL, Lipscomb K, Hamilton GW: Physiologic basis for assessing critical coronary stenosis, instantaneous flow response and regional distribution during coronary hyperemia as measures of coronary flow reserve. Am J Cardiol 33: 87–94, 1974.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wilson RF, White CW: Intracoronary papaverine: an ideal coronary vasodilator for studies of the coronary circulation in conscious humans. Circulation 73: 444–451, 1986.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Foerster JM, Link DP, Lantz BM, Lee G, Holcroft JW, Mason DT: Measurement of coronary reactive hyperemia during clinical angiography by video dilution technique. Acta Radiol 22: 209–216, 1981.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Nissen SE, Elion JL, Booth DC, Evans J, DeMaria AN: Value and limitations of computer analysis of digital subtraction angiography in the assessment of coronary flow reserve. Circulation 73: 562–571, 1986.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gurley, JC, Nissen SE, Elion JL, Evans J, McMinn M, DeMaria AN: Determination of coronary flow reserve by digital angiography: Validation of a practical method not requiring power injection or ECG gating. JACC 16(1): 190–197.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nissen SE, Grayburn P, Evans J, Elion JL, Gurley JC, DeMaria AN: Calculation of absolute coronary blood flow from digital angiography: Correlation with electromagnetic flow. Circulation 74 (Suppl II): 485, 1986 (Abstract).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nissen, S.E., Gurley, J.C. (1991). Application of indicator dilution principles to regional assessment of coronary flow reserve from digital angiography. In: Reiber, J.H.C., Serruys, P.W. (eds) Quantitative Coronary Arteriography. Developments in Cardiovascular Medicine, vol 117. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3726-3_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3726-3_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5656-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-3726-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics