Skip to main content

Human Understanding

  • Chapter
Epistemology and Cognition

Part of the book series: Studies in Cognitive Systems ((COGS,volume 6))

  • 152 Accesses

Abstract

Contemporary thinkers either hold that meanings cannot be mental states, or that they are patterns of brain functions. But patterns of social, or brain, interactions cannot be that which we understand. Wittgenstein had another answer (not the one attributed to him by writers who ignore his work in psychology): understanding, he said, is seeing an item as embodying a type Q, thus constraining what items will be seen as “the same”. Those who cannot see things under an aspect are meaning-blind.

That idea is expanded in this article. Its ontology consists of types only: entities that recur in space, time, and possible worlds. Types (Socrates, Man, Red, On, etc.) overlap; Socrates = Bald at some index and not in another. The logic used is thus that of contingent identity. Now some possible worlds are mentally represented; the entities that occur in them are meanings. But such entities may also recur in the real world. Thus the entities we experience, the phenomena, which serve as our meanings, may be identical in the real world with real things. A correspondence theory of truth is thus developed: a sentence is true iff its meaning constitutes, in a specified way, a real situation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. In the appendix to Reason, Truth, and History (Cambridge, 1981) and in the appendix to Representation and Reality (MIT, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  2. W. V. O. Quine: 1983, ‘Ontology and Ideology Revisited’, The Journal of Philosophy 80, 499–502: “If the subject is disposed to react to the presence of any and every cat in some manner in which he is not disposed to react to anything but cats, then I shall reckon the term ‘cat’ to his ideology”.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. D. Davidson: 1989, ‘The Myth of the Subjective’, in M. Krausz (ed.), Relativism: Interpretation and Confrontation, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, Indiana, pp. 159–71. Quote is on p. 164.

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. Davidson: 1989, ‘The Myth of the Subjective’, in M. Krausz (ed.), Relativism: Interpretation and Confrontation, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, Indiana, pp. 159–71. Quote is on, p. 165.

    Google Scholar 

  5. D. Davidson: 1989, ‘The Myth of the Subjective’, in M. Krausz (ed.), Relativism: Interpretation and Confrontation, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, Indiana, pp. 159–71. Quote is on, p. 170.

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. Davidson: 1989, ‘The Myth of the Subjective’, in M. Krausz (ed.), Relativism: Interpretation and Confrontation, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, Indiana, pp. 159–71. Quote is on, p. 156.

    Google Scholar 

  7. D. Davidson: 1989, ‘The Myth of the Subjective’, in M. Krausz (ed.), Relativism: Interpretation and Confrontation, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, Indiana, pp. 159–71. Quote is on p. 164.

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. Davidson: 1989, ‘The Myth of the Subjective’, in M. Krausz (ed.), Relativism: Interpretation and Confrontation, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, Indiana, pp. 159–71. Quote is on, p. 164.

    Google Scholar 

  9. I discuss this issue in my 1989: ‘Wittgenstein on Meaning’, Grazer Philosophische Studien 33–34, 415–435.

    Google Scholar 

  10. See my 1976: ‘Substance Logic’ (with E. Walther), Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 43, 55–74 “A Plea for a New Nominalism’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 12, 527–37 and my 1985 ‘Numbers’, Synthese 64, 225–39.

    Google Scholar 

  11. The formalization of that statement involves a variable-binding operator, x(… x…). It is, l(J = l 1 & M = l 2 ).

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. Barwise and J. Perry: 1983, Situations and Attitudes, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  13. See, e.g., ‘Rationality and Believing the Impossible’, Journal of Philosophy 80, 321–38 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  14. See S. Kripke, ‘A Puzzle about Belief, in A. Margalit (ed.): 1979, Meaning and Use, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 239–83.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. I argued that point in my 1987: Truth and Some Relativists’, Grazer Philosophische Studien 29, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zemach, E.M. (1991). Human Understanding. In: Fetzer, J.H. (eds) Epistemology and Cognition. Studies in Cognitive Systems, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3716-4_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3716-4_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5652-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-3716-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics