Abstract
The method of electrolytic reduction is deemed to be well-suited for the selective reduction of Eu(III) to Eu(II) and subsequent precipitation of highly pure EuSO4. To more fully understand fundamental aspects of the electrolytic reduction of Eu(III), cathodic polarization characteristics of Eu(III) on a titanium electrode were examined in aqueous solutions of EuCl3 and EuCl3−HCl. The effects of cathode potential, catholyte agitation speed, EuCl3 concentration, temperature, etc. were investigated. The reduction of Eu(III) started at a cathode potential of about −0.6 V vs SHE. The plateau current for the reduction of Eu(III) was reached at around −1.2 V vs SHE. A further decrease in cathodic potential resulted in a decrease in the reduction current. The plateau current shown by the cathodic polarization curve exhibited a half order dependence on the stirring speed of electrolyte and first order dependence on the EuCl3 concentration. The apparent activation energy was 15.7 kJ-mol−1. These results suggest that the plateau current given by the cathodic polarization curve is diffusionlimiting in the electrolytic reduction of Eu(III).
Batch-type electrolytic reduction of Eu(III) was investigated using a bipolar electrolytic cell, which consisted of a titanium cathode, a platinum anode and an anion exchange membrane. The effects of pH, reduction current, catholyte flow rate, temperature and Eu(III) concentration on the reduction rate of Eu(III) and on current efficiency were investigated. It was found that a current efficiency of over 0.6 could be achieved by keeping the pH of the electrolyte constant at 2, in order to avoid hydrolysis of Eu(III).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
W.M. Latimer; “Oxidation States of the Elements and their Potentials in Aqueous Solutions”, 2nd Ed., Prentice Hall, New York (1952), p. 294.
L.B. Aspery, B.B. Cunningham; “Progress in Inorganic Chemistry”, Vol. 11, Edited by F.A. Cotton, Interscience, New York (1960), p. 267.
C.G. Byown and L.J. Sherrington; Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 1979, Vol. 29, p. 193.
D. Lu, J.S. Horng and C.P. Tung; Journal of Metals, 1988, Vol. 40, p. 32.
H. Majima, Y. Awakura and S. Hirono; Metallurgical Transactions B, 1986, Vol. 17B, p. 41.
H. Majima, Y. Awakura, K. Sato and S. Hirono; Metallurgical Transactions B, 1986, Vol. 17B, p. 69.
Y. Awakura, K. Sato, H. Majima and S. Hirono; Metallurgical Transactions B, 1987, Vol. 18B, p. 19.
Y. Awakura, H. Hiai, H. Majima and S. Hirono; Metallurgical Transactions B, 1989, Vol. 20B, p. 337.
M. Eigen, W. Kruse, G. Maass and L. de Maeyer; Progress in Reaction Kinetics, 1964, Vol. 2, p. 287.
M. Anbar, Z.B. Alfass and H. Bregman-Reisler; Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1967, Vol. 89, p. 1263.
B. Cercek and M. Ebert; Journal of Physical Chemistry, 1968, Vol.72, p.766.
V.G. Levich; “Physicochemical Hydrodynamics”, Prentice Hall, New York (1962), p. 70.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1991 Institution of Mining and Metallurgy
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hirato, T., Majima, H., Awakura, Y. (1991). Electrolytic reduction of Eu(III) in acidic chloride solutions. In: EMC ’91: Non-Ferrous Metallurgy—Present and Future. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3684-6_38
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3684-6_38
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-85166-715-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-3684-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive