Summary
For a new hydrogenation process at DSM a hydrogen feed gas with a purity of at least 98% was required. There were four options in this case: separation of hydrogen by membranes or by Pressure Swing Adsorption (PSA), using hydrogen containing feed gas from either a naphtha cracker or a cryogenic recovery unit.
The naphtha cracker gas contains 90% hydrogen and 10% methane and has a pressure of 20 to 22 bar. By means of PSA it is possible to produce a hydrogen gas with a purity of 99.9% and a recovery of 84 to 89%. For a membrane unit the feed gas can be used at the available pressure or it can be compressed. By means of membranes it is possible to produce a hydrogen gas with a purity of 98 to 99%, with recoveries varying from 64 to 95%.
The product gas from the cryogenic unit contains 92.3% hydrogen and 6.2% nitrogen, the remainder being helium, argon and methane. The pressure is 70 bar. When membranes are used, the hydrogen product gas has a purity of 98.2% and the recovery is 93%. If the recovery of hydrogen has to be carried out by PSA, the feed pressure has to be lowered to 20 – 30 bar. The product gas has a purity of 99.6%, while the recovery is 80%.
Comparison of all options, including compiession of product gas to 100 bar, shows that membrane permeation with cryogenic product gas as feed is the best choice.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Abbreviations
- A membrane area:
-
m2
- Ci concentration of component i:
-
Nm3/m3
- Di diffusivity of component i in membrane:
-
m2/s
- Ji permeate flux of component i through membrane:
-
Nm3/(m2.s)
- Pi permeability of component i through membrane:
-
Nm3.m/(m2.bar.s)
- Pf feed pressure:
-
bar
- Pp permeate pressure:
-
bar
- pi partial pressure of component i:
-
bar
- Qi flow rate of component i through membrane:
-
Nm3/s
- Si solubility coefficient of component i in membrane:
-
Nm3/(m3.bar)
- X distance of permeation in membrane:
-
m
- l thickness of effective separation layer:
-
m
- α ideal separation factor:
-
-
References
- Agrawal, R., Auvil, S.R., DiMartino, S.P., Choe, J.S. and Hopkins, J.A. (1988) ‘Cryogenic hybrid processes for hydrogen purification’, Gas Sep. Purif., vol 2, no 1, pp. 9–15.
- Knoblauch, K., Jüntgen, H. and Peters, W. (1979) ‘Gastrennung mit Kohlenstoff- molekularsieben’, Erdol Kohle, Erdgas, Petrochem., vol 32, no 12, pp. 551–556.
- Meindersma, G.W. (1990) ‘Comparisor of several hydrogen separation processes’, Process Technology Proceedings, 8, Gas Separation Technology, Ed. by Vansant, E.F. and Dewolfs, R., Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam, pp. 623–630.
- Wiessner, F.G. (1988) ‘Basics and industrial applications of pressure swing adsorption (PSA), the modern way to separate gas’, Gas Sep. Purif., vol. 2, no 3, pp. 115–119.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1991 Elsevier Science Publishers Ltd, England
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Meindersma, G.W. (1991). Membrane Permeation and Pressure Swing Adsorption (PSA) for the Production of High Purity Hydrogen. In: Turner, M.K. (eds) Effective Industrial Membrane Processes: Benefits and Opportunities. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3682-2_29
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3682-2_29
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-85166-723-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-3682-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive