Skip to main content

Weakest—Link Failure Prediction for Ceramics

  • Chapter
Designing with Structural Ceramics
  • 277 Accesses

Abstract

Detailed problems associated with measurement and interpretation of the bend strength of ceramics are presented. The relationship between 3- and 4-point bend and biaxial test results is discussed in the light of current theoretical understanding. There remain a number of unresolved aspects and a new, ‘damage mechanics’ approach is mooted for further consideration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Newnham, R.C., Strength tests for brittle materials. Proc. Brit. Ceram. Soc., 1975, 25, 281–93.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hoagland, R.G., Marshall, C.W. and Duckworth, W.H. Reduction of errors in ceramic bend tests. J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 1976, 59, 189–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chau, F.S. and Stanley, P., An assessment of systematic errors in beam tests on brittle materials. J. Mater. Sci., 1985, 20, 1782–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shore, P., State of the art in ‘damage free’ grinding of advanced engineering ceramics. Brit. Ceram. Proc., 1990, 46, 189–200.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dortmans, L. and de With, G., Weakest-link failure prediction for ceramics using finite element post-processing. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., Submitted.

    Google Scholar 

  6. McHargue, C.J., The mechanical properties of ion implanted ceramics — A review. Defect and Diffusion Forum, 1988, 57–58, 359–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bergman, B., How to estimate Weibull parameters. Brit. Ceram. Proc., 1987, 39, 175–85.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Chaboche, J.L., Continuous damage mechanics — A tool to describe phenomena before crack initiation. Nucl. Engng. Pes., 1981, 64, 233–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kachanov, M. and Laures, J.-P., Three-dimensional problems of strongly interacting arbitrarily located penny-shaped cracks. Int. J. Fract., 1989, 41, 289–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fabrikant, V.I., Close interaction of coplanar circular cracks in an elastic medium. Acta. Mech., 1987, 67, 39–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 ECSC, EEC, EAEC, Brussels and Luxembourg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dortmans, L., de With, G. (1991). Weakest—Link Failure Prediction for Ceramics. In: Davidge, R.W., Van de Voorde, M.H. (eds) Designing with Structural Ceramics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3678-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3678-5_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-85166-740-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-3678-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics