Skip to main content

Merleau-Ponty on Politics, History, and Violence

  • Chapter
Elements of Responsible Politics

Part of the book series: Contributions To Phenomenology ((CTPH,volume 7))

  • 53 Accesses

Abstract

Merleau-Ponty's political philosophy readily lends itself to division into two main periods. The first, Marxian, period began in 1944 and ended in mid 1950. The second, post-Marxian or “liberal,” period began in mid 1950 and lasted until his death in 1961.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Kerry H. Whiteside, Merleau-Ponty and the Foundation of an Existential Politics (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1988), 279. Hereafter cited as MPF. My criticisms notwithstanding, Whiteside's work is an exceptionally valuable contribution to Merleau-Pontyan scholarship. His criticism of Merleau-Ponty's later political philosophy is briefly foreshadowed by that of Martin Jay, though there is no evidence that Whiteside depends on Jay. See Jay, Marxism and Totality (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1984), 382-383. Hereafter cited as MT.

    Google Scholar 

  2. MPF, 7. My emphasis.

    Google Scholar 

  3. It can be shown, I believe, that the later period of Merleau-Ponty's political thought is less discontinuous with the earlier period that Whiteside admits. For present purposes, I will not explicitly develop that argument. But the argument I will make will in fact contain elements which could well be educed to make such a case.

    Google Scholar 

  4. This description of violence is my own. In devising it I have tried to capture what Merleau-Ponty means by it. I have also been instructed by Sergio Cotta, Why Violence? tr. by Giovanni Gullace (Gainesville: University of Florida Press, 1985) though I have not adopted his conclusion.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Humanism and Terror, tr. by John O'Neill (Boston: Beacon Press, 1969) 88-89 and 102. Hereafter cited as HT. HT is the principal work in which Merleau-Ponty's early political thought is developed. Other important early essays of his bearing on politics, especially “Concerning Marxism” and “Marxism and Philosophy” are collected in his Sense and Non-Sense, tr. by Hubert L. Dreyfus and Patricia A. Dreyfus (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1964). Hereafter cited in the body of the text as SNS.

    Google Scholar 

  6. See MT, 370.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Merleau-Ponty's use of Saussure's structuralism is sufficiently peculiar that his later view of history can be called “Saussurean” only in a heterodox sense. For instructive remarks on how Merleau-Ponty appropriated Saus-sure, see James M. Edie, “Foreword,“ in Merleau-Ponty, Consciousness and the Acquisition of Language, tr. by Hugh J. Silverman (Evanston: Northwestern University Press), 1973, xi-xxxii; and Edie, “The Meaning and Development of Merleau-Ponty's Concept of Structure” in Merleau-Ponty: Perception, Structure, Language, ed. by John Sallis (Atlantic Highlands: Humanities Press, 1981), 39-57.

    Google Scholar 

  8. MT, 366.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Adventures of the Dialectic, tr. by Joseph Bien (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1973), 26. Hereafter cited in the body of the text as AD.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Signs, tr. by Richard C. McCleary (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1964), 20. Hereafter cited in the body of the text as S.

    Google Scholar 

  11. See also MT, 372-375.

    Google Scholar 

  12. I document this claim in my The Politics of Hope (London and New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1986), 23-39. See also MT, 361-384.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Merleau-Ponty's root requirement is a special sort of procedural requirement. It is the “ur-procedural” requirement that all specific requirements, substantive and procedural, must satisfy if they are to be binding.

    Google Scholar 

  14. For a fuller discussion of the important distinction between holding a political position hypothetically and holding it categorically, see my “Ideology, Utopia, and Responsible Politics” in this volume.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dauenhauer, B.P. (1991). Merleau-Ponty on Politics, History, and Violence. In: Elements of Responsible Politics. Contributions To Phenomenology, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3564-1_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3564-1_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5579-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-3564-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics