Abstract
The present paper is one installment in a lengthy task, the replacement of atomistic interpretations of Wittgenstein’s Tractatus by a wholistic interpretation on which the world-in-logical-space is not constructed out of objects but objects are abstracted from out of that space. Here, general arguments against atomism are directed toward a specific target, the four aspects of the atomistic reading of Tractatus given in the Hintikkas’ Investigating Wittgenstein (Hintikka & Hintikka 1986). The aspects in question are called the semantical, metaphysical, epistemological and formal.
What follows a précis of the Hintikkas’ rendering of Wittgenstein’s perspective is a characterization of the wholistic interpretation, comparing Wittgenstein’s world and the transcendental conditions it sets upon possible notation to a blank page and the conditions it sets upon what is about to be written there. There will not be occasion to bring arguments against each plank in the atomist’s platform or in support of each facet of wholism. But there is an extended treatment of the first two aspects — the semantical and metaphysical — which takes off from Wittgenstein’s determination that, in his hands, “logic must take care of itself”.
The second half of the paper contains a negative assessment of the support the atomistic reading can glean from the texts of Tractatus and Notebooks. From a detailed look into a range of relevant textual and translational issues, we find little there to encourage that interpretation and much to discourage it.
The paper closes on a preliminary consideration of one segment of the formal aspect of the Hintikkas’ atomism, the idea that the analysis of Tractatus is the analysis of Russell or is, at worst, a near relative. Examination shows that Wittgenstein would have little reason to model his analysis on that of Russell. The fundamentally wholistic vision expressed in Tractatus requires a distinctively non-Russellian, decompositional version of analysis.
Words are like a film on deep water
LUDWIG WITTGENSTEIN Notebooks 1914–1916
A highly condensed version of the ideas here presented will appear in the article HintikkcCs Tractatus in Proceedings of the XlVth International Wittgenstein Symposium, Wittgenstein Centenary Celebration, 1991.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anscombe, G. E. M.: 1959, An Introduction to Wittgenstein’s Tractatus, 2nd ed., Harper & Row, New York.
Black, M.: 1964, A Companion to Wittgenstein’s Tractatus, Cornell University Press, New York.
Dummett, M.: 1978, Preface to Truth and Other Enigmas, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Dummett, M.: 1981, The Interpretation of Frege’s Philosophy, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Frege, G.: 1977, Translations from the Philosophical Writings, P. Geach and M. Black (trans.), Cornell University Press, New York.
Frege, G.: 1979, Posthumous Writings, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, England.
Gödel, K.: 1983, ‘Russell’s Mathematical Logic’, in P. Benacerraf and H. Putnam (eds.), Philosophy of Mathematics. Selected Readings, 2nd edn., Cambridge University Press, pp. 447–85.
Hintikka, Merrill B. and Jaakko Hintikka: 1986, Investigating Wittgenstein, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, England.
Kraus, Karl: 1987, Über die Sprache, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt.
McGuinness, B. (ed.): 1979, Wittgenstein and the Vienna Circle. Conversations Recorded by Friedrich Waismann, J. Schulte and B. McGuinness (trans.), Basil Blackwell, Oxford, England.
McGuinness, B. (ed.): 1984, Wittgenstein und der Weiner Kreis. Gespräche, aufgezeichnet von Friedrich Waismann, Ludwig Wittgenstein, Werkausgabe, Band 3, Suhrkamp.
Quine, W V. O.: 1971, Set Theory and its Logic, rev. edn., Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Russell, B.: 1956, Logic and Knowledge. Essays 1901–1950, R. C. Marsh (ed.), London.
Russell, B.: 1961, Introduction Ludwig Wittgenstein Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Russell, B.: 1985, The Philosophy of Logical Atomism, Open Court.
Russell, B. and A. N. Whitehead: 1967, Principia Mathematica to *56, Cambridge University Press.
Wittgenstein, L.: 1953, Philosophical Investigations, G. E. M. Anscombe (trans.), Macmillan, London and New York.
Wittgenstein, L.: 1961, Notebooks 1914–1916, G. H. von Wright and G. E. M. Anscombe (ed.), Harper and Row, London and New York.
Wittgenstein, L.: 1961, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, D. F. Pears and B. F. McGuinness (trans.), Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Wittgenstein, L.: 1982, Last Writings, G. H. von Wright and H. Nyman (eds.), University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.
Wittgenstein, L.: 1984, ‘Aufzeichnungen über Logik, 1913’, in Wittgenstein: Werkausgabe Band I, Suhrkamp.
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1991 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McCarty, D.C. (1991). The Philosophy of Logical Wholism. In: Hintikka, J. (eds) Wittgenstein in Florida. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3552-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3552-8_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5573-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-3552-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive