Abstract
The many and obvious contrasts between Connectionism and (something like) “most other work in Cognitive Science” often give rise to rather grandiose talk of scientific upheaval. Thus it is common to hear the proposal that Connectionism represents (or is the beginning of, or at least points in the general direction of) a whole new approach and perhaps even a whole new paradigm in the study of cognition, an approach which directly contests and may even be displacing (something like) the dominant symbolic view. This is an exciting prospect, especially for those philosophers and others who prefer to view such topics as artificial intelligence and cognitive psychology in terms of the grand sweep of intellectual history. Unfortunately, despite the endless tabloid observations, nobody yet seems altogether sure just what Connectionism is, in any sense going beyond the standard fare of dull details and techno-truisms about the nature of typical Connectionist networks. Indeed, in discussion to date there is very little agreement even over how the phenomenon itself is best described: some regard Connectionism as nothing less than a whole new paradigm, while others-using progressively more vague terminology-have described it as a radically new architecture, theory, framework, model, approach, and simply as a new view.
Communication across the revolutionary divide is inevitably partial.
Kuhn (1962) p.149.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bechtel, W.: 1985, ‘Contemporary Connectionism: Are the New Parallel Distributed Processing Models Cognitive or Associationist?’ Behaviorism 13, 53–61.
Bechtel, W.: 1986, ‘What Happens to Accounts of Mind-Brain Relations If We Forego an Architecture of Rules and Representations?’ Philosophy of Science Association 1, 159–171.
Brandom, R.: 1987, ‘Singular Terms and Sentential Sign Designs.’ Philosophical Topics 15, 125–167.
Cummins, R. and Schwarz G.: 1987, ‘Radical Connectionism,’ Southern Journal of Philosophy 26, Supplement, 43–61.
Cussins, A.: 1988?, ‘The Connectionist Construction of Concepts.’ Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
Cussins, A.: 1990, ‘Connectionist Construction of Concepts’, in M A. Boden (ed), The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence (Oxford Readings in Philosophy), (pp. 368–440), Osford University Press, Oxford.
Dennett, D.C.: 1986, ‘The Logical Geography of Computational Approaches: A View from the East Pole,’ in M. Brand and R. M. Harnish, The Representation of Knowledge and Belief, University of Arizona Press, Tucson.
Elman, J. L.: 1989, ‘Representation and Structure in Connectionist Models,’ Technical Report 8903, Center for Research in Language, University of California, San Diego.
Fodor, J. A. and McLaughlin, B. P.: (this volume), ‘Connectionism and the Problem of Systematicity: Why Smolensky’s Solution Doesn’t Work.’
Fodor, J.A. and Pylyshyn, Z. W.: 1988, ‘Connectionism and Cognitive Architecture: A Critical Analysis,’ Cognition 28, 3–71.
Fodor, J. A.: 1975, The Language of Thought, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Haugeland, J.: 1978, ‘The Nature and Plausibility of Cognitivism,’ Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1, 215–226.
Haugeland, J.: 1985, Artificial Intelligence: TheVery Idea, Bradford/MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Hinton, G. E.: 1988, ‘Representing Part-Whole Hierarchies in Connectionist Networks,’ Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 48–54, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Horgan, T. and Tienson, J.: 1987, ‘Settling Into a New Paradigm,’ Southern Journal of Philosophy 26, Supplement, 97–113.
Horgan, T. and Tienson, J.: 1989, ‘Representations Without Rules,’ Philosophical Topics 15.
Kuhn, T.S.: 1962, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
McLaughlin, B.: 1987, ‘Tye on Connectionism,’ Southern Journal of Philosophy 26, Supplement, 185–193.
Neisser, 1967, Cognitive Psychology, Appleton-Century-Croft, New York.
Newell, A. and Simon, H.: 1976, ‘Computer Science as an Empirical Inquiry,’ Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery 19, 113–126.
Pollack, J.: 1988, ‘Recursive Auto-Associative Memory: Devising Compositional Distributed Representations,’ Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Pollack, J.: (forthcoming), ‘Recursive Distributed Representations,’ Artificial Intelligence.
Pylyshyn, Z. W.: 1984, Computation and Cognition: Toward a Foundation for Cognitive Science, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Smolensky, P.: 1987, ‘On Variable Binding and the Representation of Symbolic Structures in Connectionist Systems,’ CU-CS-355-87.
Smolensky, P.: 1988, ‘The Proper Treatment of Connectionism,’ Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11(1), 1–23.
St. John, M. F. and McClelland, J. L.: 1988, ‘Applying Contextual Constraints in Sentence Comprehension,’ Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, (August 1988), pp. 26–32, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Tye, M.: 1987, ‘Representation in Pictorialism and Connectionism,’ Southern Journal of Philosophy 26, Supplement, 163–184.
van Gelder, T.: 1989a, ‘Compositionality and the Explanation of Cognitive Processes,’ Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Ann Arbor Michigan.
van Gelder, T.: 1989b, ‘Distributed Representation,’ Ph.D Thesis, University of Pittsburgh.
van Gelder, T.: (1990), ‘Compositionality: A Connectionist Variation on a Classical Theme,’ Cognitive Science 14, 355–384.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1991 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Van Gelder, T. (1991). Classical Questions, Radical Answers: Connectionism and the Structure of Mental Representations. In: Horgan, T., Tienson, J. (eds) Connectionism and the Philosophy of Mind. Studies in Cognitive Systems, vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3524-5_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3524-5_16
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5559-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-3524-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive