Skip to main content

Constitutional Theory in the Light of the New Institutionalism

  • Chapter
Law, Institution and Legal Politics

Part of the book series: Law and Philosophy Library ((LAPS,volume 14))

  • 170 Accesses

Abstract

The new institutionalism is not a descendent of the classical legal doctrine of the institutions; nor is it a revised version of Maurice Hauriou’s or Carl Schmitt’s theories. It has evolved independently from those theories and it expresses a largely different conception of social norms, of the law and of the institutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. D.N. MacCormick O. Weinberger An Institutional Theory of Law: New Approaches to Legal Positivism, Dordrecht et al. 1986; German version: Grundlagen des Institutionaliustischen Rechtspositivismus, Berlin 1985; O. Weinberger, Recht, Institution und Rechtspolitik. Grundprobleme der Rechtstheorie und Sozialphilosophie, Stuttgart 1987; the same, Norm und Institution. Eine Einführung in die Theorie des Rechts, Wien 1988

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. Dworkin, Taking Rights Seriously, Harvard 19782

    Google Scholar 

  3. See O. Weinberger, Norm und Institution. Eine Einführung in die Theorie des Rechts, Wien 1988, p. 91 ff.; the same, Rechtslogik, Berlin 19892, p. 64, p.91

    Google Scholar 

  4. See A. Procházka, Normative Theorie und Rechtserzeugung, in: V. Kubeš O. Weinberger (eds.), Die Brünner rechtstheoretische Schule (Normative Theorie), Wien 1980, pp. 304–323

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kelsen’s Pure Theory of Law (second edition) provides arguably the most striking expression of the purely normative conception of legal dogmatics. Kelsen describes the sentence expressing the ought rule as conditio per quam,- or the true reason for the validity of the normative conclusion, as one might say — while he regards the sentence stating the facts merely as conditio sine qua non of the conclusion. (pp. 191 f.) In view of the fact that both premisses are necessary for attaining a conclusion such a distinction is logically untenable

    Google Scholar 

  6. MacCormick and O. Weinberger, op. cit., pp. 49–76 (German version, pp. 76–107)

    Google Scholar 

  7. See O. Weinberger, Institutionentheorie und Institutionalistischer Rechtspositivismus, in: the same and W. Krawietz (eds.), Helmuth Schelsky als Soziologe und politischer Denker, Stuttgart 1985, p. 150 ff

    Google Scholar 

  8. As in H. Kelsen, Hauptprobleme der Staatsrechtslehre, entwickelt aus der Lehre vom Rechtssatze, Tübingen 1911, p. 202. — Kelsen never abandoned that stance

    Google Scholar 

  9. This is the view taken by Kelsen in the late development of his theory. See H. Kelsen, All gemeine Theorie der Normen, ed. by K. Ringhofer and R. Walter, Wien 1979; O. Weinberger, Normentheorie als Grundlage der Jurisprudenz und Ethik. Eine Auseinandersetzung mit Hans Kelsens Theorie der Normen, Berlin 1981

    Google Scholar 

  10. See H.L.A. Hart, The Concept of Law, Oxford 19726, Chap. V and p. 245

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Weber, Wissenschaft und Gesellschaft, Tübingen 19725, p. 28

    Google Scholar 

  12. For the concept of the scope for action see O. Weinberger, Freedom, Range for Action, and the Ontology of Norms, in: Synthese, vol. 65 (1985), pp. 307–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. See B. Barnes, The Nature of Power, Oxford 1988

    Google Scholar 

  14. See for example P. Graf Kielmannsegg (ed.), Legitimitätsprobleme politischer Systeme, Ctoladen 1976

    Google Scholar 

  15. See O. Weinberger, Angst vor dem menschlichen Wahn, in: A. Grabncr-Haider O. Weinberger K. Weinke (eds.), Fanatismus und Massenwahn, Graz/Wien 1987, pp. 4–34

    Google Scholar 

  16. See my paper “Abstimmungslogik und Demokratie” [in: B. Sutter et al. (eds.), Reformen des Rechts, Graz 1979, pp. 605–623] where I have attempted to show that collective decisionmaking processes are possible only on the basis of normative rules. In a modern state the constitution has the task of providing a normative basis for the definition of the functions fulfilled by the organs of the state as well as the competences and the decision-making processes

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Weinberger, O. (1991). Constitutional Theory in the Light of the New Institutionalism. In: Law, Institution and Legal Politics. Law and Philosophy Library, vol 14. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3458-3_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3458-3_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5530-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-3458-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics