Abstract
The paper will argue for the necessity of maintaining the distinction between movement rules and rules of construal (taken for granted in the standard version of the Government Binding Theory, e.g., in (1981), but denied in (1987)). It will identify a distinguishing property of movement rules not taken into account so far: the capability of creating scope.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Chomsky, N. (1981) Lectures on Government and Binding, Foris, Dordrecht.
Chomsky, N. (1986) Barriers, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Cinque, G. (1982) “Constructions with Left Peripheral Phrases, ‘Connectedness’, Move Alpha and ECP”, unpublished, University of Venice.
Groos, A. and H. van Riemsdijk (1981) “Matching Effects in Free Relatives: A Parameter of Core Grammar”, in A. Belletti, L. Brandi, L. Rizzi, eds., Theory of Markedness in Generative Grammar, Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa.
Haik, I. (1984) “Indirect Binding”, Linguistic Inquiry 15, 185–223.
Kayne, R. (1980) “Extensions of Binding and Case Marking”, Linguistic Inquiry 11, 75–96.
É. Kiss, K. (1985-1986) “Parasitic Chains”, The Linguistic Review 5, 41–74.
É. Kiss, K. (1987) Configurationality in Hungarian, Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, Reidel, Dordrecht.
É. Kiss, K. (1988) “Eliminating the Configurationality Parameter”, unpublished, Linguistics Institute of the Academy of Sciences, Budapest.
Koster, J. (1987) Domains and Dynasties, Foris, Dordrecht.
Marácz, L. (1987) “Connectedness and Correspondence Effects in Hungarian”, GLOW Newsletter 18, 43–45.
Marácz, L. and S.de Meij (1986) “On Question Sentences in Hungarian”, in W. Abraham and S. de Meij, eds., Topic, Focus, and Configurationality, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
May, R. (1977) The Grammar of Quantification, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
May, R. (1985) Logical Form: its Structure and Derivation, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Reinhart, T. (1976) The Syntactic Domain of Anaphora, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT,, Cambridge, Mass.
Riemsdijk, H. van (1983) “Corresepondence Effects and the Empty Category Principle”, in Y. Otsu et al., eds., Studies in Generative Grammar and Language Acquisition, Editorial Committee, Tokyo.
Riemsdijk, H. van and E. Williams (1981) “NP-structure”, The Linguistic Review 1, 171–217.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1991 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kiss, K.É. (1991). An Argument for Movement. In: Haider, H., Netter, K. (eds) Representation and Derivation in the Theory of Grammar. Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, vol 22. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3446-0_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3446-0_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5524-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-3446-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive