Skip to main content

Duopoly, Inventories and Futures Markets

  • Chapter
Commodity, Futures and Financial Markets

Part of the book series: Advanced Studies in Theoretical and Applied Econometrics ((ASTA,volume 21))

Abstract

Most of the literature dedicated to futures or forward markets is built on the assumption that goods traded on these markets are produced by perfectly competitive firms, i.e. firms that act as price-takers. The results then focus on optimal rules for hedging or speculating.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allaz, B (1987), Strategie Forward Transactions Under Imperfect Competition — The Duopoly Case, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Princeton University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allaz, B (1988), “Oligopoly, Uncertainty and Strategic Forward Transactions”, working paper, Centre HEC-ISA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allaz, B and J-L Vila (1989), “Cournot Competition, Forward Markets and Efficiency”, mimeo, Centre HEC-ISA and Stern School of Business, New York University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R W (1984), “The Industrial Organization of Futures Markets: A Survey” in R W Anderson (ed.), The Industrial Organization of Futures Markets, D.C. Heath, Lexington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R W (1985), “Market Power and Futures Trading for Durable Goods”, working paper, City University of New York, Graduate Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R W and T Brianza (1989), “Cartel Behavior and Futures Trading”, working paper, City University of New York, Graduate Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R W and M Sundaresan (1984), “Futures Markets and Monopoly” in R W Anderson (ed.), The Industrial Organization of Futures Markets, D.C. Heath, Lexington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brianza, T, L Phlips and J-F Richard (1987),:Futures Markets, Inventories and Monopoly”, Core Discussion Paper 8725.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulow, J I, J D Geanakoplos and P D Klemperer (1985), “Multimarket Oligopoly: Strategic Substitutes and Complements”, Journal of Political Economy, 93, 488–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A (1986), “Comparative Statics for Oligopoly”, International Economic Review, 27, 107–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eldor, R and I Zilcha (1986), “Oligopoly, Uncertain Demand and Forward Markets”, working paper, Department of Economics, Tel Aviv University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenstone, W D (1981), “The Coffee Cartel: Manipulation in the Public Interest”, Journal of Futures Markets, 1, 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newbery, D M G (1984), “The Manipulation of Futures Markets by a Dominant Producer” in R W Anderson (ed.), The Industrial Organization of Futures Markets, D.C. Heath, Lexington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phlips, L and R M Harstad (1990), “Interaction Between Resource Extraction and Futures Markets: A Game-Theoretic Analysis” in R Selten (ed.), Game Theory in the Behavioural Sciences, Springer Verlag, Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotemberg, J J and G Saloner (1985), “Strategic Inventories and the Excess Volatility of Production”, working paper, Sloan School of Management and Department of Economics, M.I.T.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saloner, G (1984), “The Role of Obsolescence and Inventory Costs in Providing Commitment”, working paper, Department of Economics, M.I.T.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Allaz, B. (1991). Duopoly, Inventories and Futures Markets. In: Phlips, L. (eds) Commodity, Futures and Financial Markets. Advanced Studies in Theoretical and Applied Econometrics, vol 21. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3354-8_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3354-8_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5482-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-3354-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics